Literature DB >> 26913227

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rafael De la Garza-Ramos1, Mario Benvenutti-Regato2, Enrique Caro-Osorio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) are two minimally invasive techniques used to relieve pain and restore stability in metastatic spinal disease. However, most of these procedures are performed in the thoracolumbar spine, and there is limited data on outcomes after VP/KP for cervical metastases. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VP and KP for treating pain in patients with cervical spine metastases.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Medline databases. Only studies that reported five or more patients treated with VP/KP in the cervical spine were included. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were established based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Data was pooled to perform a meta-analysis for pain relief and complication rates.
RESULTS: Six studies (all level 4 studies) met the inclusion criteria, representing 120 patients undergoing VP/KP at 135 vertebrae; the most common addressed level was C2 in 83 cases. The average volume of injected cement was 2.5 ± 0.5 milliliters at each vertebra. There were 22 asymptomatic cement leaks (16%; 95% CI, 9.8% - 22.2%) most commonly occurring in the paraspinal soft tissue. There were 5 complications (4%; 95% CI, 0.5% - 7.5%): 3 cases of mild odynophagia, 1 case of occipital neuralgia secondary to leak, and 1 case of stroke secondary to cement embolism. Pain relief was achieved in 89% of cases (range: 80 - 100%). The calculated average pain score decreased significantly from 7.6 ± 0.9 before surgery to 1.9 ± 0.8 at last evaluation (p=0.006).
CONCLUSION: Although the calculated complication rate after VP/KP in the cervical spine is low (4%) and the reported pain relief rate is approximately 89%, there is lack of high-quality evidence supporting this. Future randomized controlled trials are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical metastases; kyphoplasty; spinal metastases; systematic review; vertebroplasty

Year:  2016        PMID: 26913227      PMCID: PMC4752017          DOI: 10.14444/3007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  26 in total

1.  Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate : a case report.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Lesions of the atlas and axis.

Authors:  H H Sherk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The management of spinal epidural metastases.

Authors:  J Brihaye; P Ectors; M Lemort; P Van Houtte
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  1988

Review 5.  An update on the nonoperative treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  N S Schachar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanics of vertebral bone augmentation.

Authors:  Celene Hadley; Omer Abdulrehman Awan; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 7.  Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two randomised controlled vertebroplasty trials of 2009.

Authors:  Bronek Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Tumor extravasation following a cement augmentation procedure for vertebral compression fracture in metastatic spinal disease.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Cruz; Arjun Sahgal; Cari Whyne; Michael G Fehlings; Roger Smith
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-06-06

9.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty relieves pain in metastatic cervical fractures.

Authors:  S Masala; G C Anselmetti; M Muto; M Mammucari; T Volpi; G Simonetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up.

Authors:  A Cotten; F Dewatre; B Cortet; R Assaker; D Leblond; B Duquesnoy; P Chastanet; J Clarisse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Surgical treatment for metastases of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Farzam Vazifehdan; Vasilios G Karantzoulis; Vasilios G Igoumenou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review.

Authors:  Frédéric Clarençon; Robert Fahed; Evelyne Cormier; Idriss Haffaf; Jean-Philippe Spano; Eimad Shotar; Kévin Premat; Raphael Bonaccorsi; Vincent Degos; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  An Experimental Intervention Study Assessing the Impact of a Thin Silicone Gel Surface Overlay on Interface Pressure.

Authors:  Seth Kwadjo Angmorterh; Andrew England; Sonia Aboagye; Eric Kwasi Ofori; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-11-24

4.  Vessel-Plasty Using Bone-Filling Mesh Container for Treatment of Malignant Severe Compression Fractures in Cervical Vertebrae.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Qinghua Tian; Tao Wang; Yingying Lu; Wenbin Li; Chungen Wu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Management of Painful Metastatic and Primary Spinal Tumors.

Authors:  Omid Hariri; Ariel Takayanagi; Dan E Miulli; Javed Siddiqi; Frank Vrionis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-03-24

6.  Combined Percutaneous Kyphoplasty/Pediculoplasty by Posterolateral Transpedicular Approach for Painful Cervical Spine Metastases: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yonghui Xia; Huan Zhai; Xinlei Wang; Yudong Wang; Bo Feng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 7.  When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Ilya Laufer; Arjun Sahgal; Yoshiya J Yamada; Meic H Schmidt; Dean Chou; John H Shin; Naresh Kumar; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Balloon kyphoplasty and additional anterior odontoid screw fixation for treatment of unstable osteolytic lesions of the vertebral body C2: a case series.

Authors:  Anna Voelker; Nicolas H von der Hoeh; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.