Kentaro Oki1, Niladri K Mahato1, Masato Nakazawa1, Shinichi Amano2, Christopher R France3, David W Russ4, Brian C Clark5. 1. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, and. 2. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, Clinical and Translational Research Unit, Ohio University, Athens. 3. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens. 4. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, School of Rehabilitation & Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens. 5. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, and clarkb2@ohio.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Decreased cortical excitability has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying task failure during sustained muscular contractions, and cortical excitability may decrease with old age. We tested the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation, which has been reported to raise cortical excitability, would prolong the time to task failure during a sustained muscular contraction in older adults. METHODS:Thirteen older adults (68.3±2.0 years; eight women and five men) performedisometric, elbow flexions to failure while receiving sham or anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Order of stimulation was randomized, and the subjects and investigators were blinded to condition. Time to task failure was measured alongside selected psychological indices of perceived exertion and affect. RESULTS:Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation prolonged mean time to task failure by approximately 15% (16.9±2.2 vs 14.7±1.8 minutes) and slowed the rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion (0.29±0.03 vs 0.31±0.03) relative to the sham condition. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a sustained, submaximal contraction in older adults by potentially increasing cortical excitability and/or influencing the perception of exertion. These results raise the question of whether interventions that acutely increase cortical excitability could enhance physical function and/or exercise-induced adaptations in older adults.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Decreased cortical excitability has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying task failure during sustained muscular contractions, and cortical excitability may decrease with old age. We tested the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation, which has been reported to raise cortical excitability, would prolong the time to task failure during a sustained muscular contraction in older adults. METHODS: Thirteen older adults (68.3±2.0 years; eight women and five men) performed isometric, elbow flexions to failure while receiving sham or anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Order of stimulation was randomized, and the subjects and investigators were blinded to condition. Time to task failure was measured alongside selected psychological indices of perceived exertion and affect. RESULTS: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation prolonged mean time to task failure by approximately 15% (16.9±2.2 vs 14.7±1.8 minutes) and slowed the rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion (0.29±0.03 vs 0.31±0.03) relative to the sham condition. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a sustained, submaximal contraction in older adults by potentially increasing cortical excitability and/or influencing the perception of exertion. These results raise the question of whether interventions that acutely increase cortical excitability could enhance physical function and/or exercise-induced adaptations in older adults.
Authors: Kathleen F Tennant; Steven E Takacs; Jen-Tzer Gau; Brian C Clark; David W Russ Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Bradley R Foerster; Thiago D Nascimento; Misty DeBoer; MaryCatherine A Bender; Indie C Rice; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; Daniel J Clauw; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Richard E Harris; Alexandre F DaSilva Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: M A Nitsche; K Fricke; U Henschke; A Schlitterlau; D Liebetanz; N Lang; S Henning; F Tergau; W Paulus Journal: J Physiol Date: 2003-08-29 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Ronak Patel; James Ashcroft; Ashish Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Adam J Woods; Harsimrat Singh; Ara Darzi; Daniel Richard Leff Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 4.677