Literature DB >> 2691246

Measurements of bone mass and bone density.

H W Wahner1.   

Abstract

X-ray-based procedures are available to measure bone mineral density in vitro at almost any skeletal site. These bone density measurements are not useful in the diagnosis of the cause of bone loss but at present are the only tests available for assessing bone mass prior to the occurrence of irreversible changes such as fractures or vertebral compression, which are easily recognizable on x-rays. When fractures are present, the severity of the bone loss and the risk for future fractures can be assessed. Repeated measurements permit estimation of the rate of bone loss, which gives useful information for monitoring treatment effect or course of the disease. Measurement of total body calcium is of less clinical importance because of the predominantly trabecular bone loss that generally occurs in metabolic bone disease. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the spine are of about equal clinical value in the first approach to the patient with metabolic bone disease, although DEXA allows greater variety in sampling sites. For repeated measurements, DEXA provides better precision at significantly lower radiation burden. For bone mineral measurements, the lumbar spine appears to be the most sensitive skeletal site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2691246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8529            Impact factor:   4.741


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bone mass in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L D Hordon; V Wright; M A Smith
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; M J Estilo; K Engelke; J Rosin; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; A T Hecker; D S Rooks; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Pairwise strength relationships of cortical and cancellous bone in human femur: an autopsy study.

Authors:  A Alho; K Strømsøe; A Høiseth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Osteopenia in 37 members of seven families: analysis based on a model of dominant inheritance.

Authors:  L D Spotila; J Caminis; M Devoto; K Shimoya; L Sereda; J Ott; M P Whyte; A Tenenhouse; D J Prockop
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Is a single anterolateral screw-plate fixation sufficient for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction? A biomechanical in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Ulrich Schreiber; Tibor Bence; Thomas Grupp; Erwin Steinhauser; Thomas Mückley; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rudolf Beisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The epidemiology of fragility fractures: is there a role for bone quality?

Authors:  C Cooper
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density.

Authors:  M Sagsveen; J E Farmer; A Prentice; A Breeze
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

9.  (Low) Energy Availability and Its Association with Injury Occurrence in Competitive Dance: Cross-Sectional Analysis in Female Dancers.

Authors:  Dasa Prus; Dragan Mijatovic; Vedran Hadzic; Daria Ostojic; Sime Versic; Natasa Zenic; Tatjana Jezdimirovic; Patrik Drid; Petra Zaletel
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 2.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.