Matthew S Bramble1, Ellen H Goldstein2, Allen Lipson1, Tuck Ngun1, Ascia Eskin1, Jason E Gosschalk1, Lara Roach1, Neerja Vashist1, Hayk Barseghyan1, Eric Lee1, Valerie A Arboleda1, Daniel Vaiman3, Zafer Yuksel4, Marc Fellous3, Eric Vilain5. 1. Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, 695 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 2. Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, 695 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Room 24-130 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 3. Department of Development, Reproduction, and Cancer, Institut Cochin, U1016 Inserm, University Sorbonne Paris, CNRS UMR8104, Paris, France. 4. Department of Medical Genetics, Women and Children Hospital, Halkkent Mh. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Boulevard No. 23, Mersin 33240, Turkey. 5. Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, 695 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA evilain@ucla.edu.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Can whole exome sequencing (WES) and in vitro validation studies be used to find the causative genetic etiology in a patient with primary ovarian failure and infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: A novel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) mutation was found by WES and shown, via in vitro flow cytometry studies, to affect membrane trafficking. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: WES may diagnose up to 25-35% of patients with suspected disorders of sex development (DSD). FSHR mutations are an extremely rare cause of 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis with primary amenorrhea due to hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A WES study was followed by flow cytometry studies of mutant protein function. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study subjects were two Turkish sisters with hypergonadotropic primary amenorrhea, their parents and two unaffected sisters. The affected siblings and both parents were sequenced (trio-WES). Transient transfection of HEK 293T cells was performed with a vector containing wild-type FSHR as well as the novel FSHR variant that was discovered by WES. Cellular localization of FSHR protein as well as FSH-stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) production was evaluated using flow cytometry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Both affected sisters were homozygous for a previously unreported missense mutation (c.1222G>T, p.Asp408Tyr) in the second transmembrane domain of FSHR. Modeling predicted disrupted secondary structure. Flow cytometry demonstrated an average of 48% reduction in cell-surface signal detection (P < 0.01). The mean fluorescent signal for cAMP (second messenger of FSHR), stimulated by FSH, was reduced by 50% in the mutant-transfected cells (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is an in vitro validation. All novel purported genetic variants can be clinically reported only as 'variants of uncertain significance' until more patients with a similar phenotype are discovered with the same variant. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We report the first WES-discovered FSHR mutation, validated by quantitative flow cytometry. WES is a valuable tool for diagnosis of rare genetic diseases, and flow cytometry allows for quantitative characterization of purported variants. WES-assisted diagnosis allows for treatments aimed at the underlying molecular etiology of disease. Future studies should focus on pharmacological and assisted reproductive treatments aimed at the disrupted FSHR, so that patients with FSH resistance can be treated by personalized medicine. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: E.V. is partially funded by the DSD Translational Research Network (NICHD 1R01HD068138). M.S.B. is funded by the Neuroendocrinology, Sex Differences and Reproduction training grant (NICHD 5T32HD007228). The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
STUDY QUESTION: Can whole exome sequencing (WES) and in vitro validation studies be used to find the causative genetic etiology in a patient with primary ovarian failure and infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: A novel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) mutation was found by WES and shown, via in vitro flow cytometry studies, to affect membrane trafficking. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: WES may diagnose up to 25-35% of patients with suspected disorders of sex development (DSD). FSHR mutations are an extremely rare cause of 46, XX gonadal dysgenesis with primary amenorrhea due to hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A WES study was followed by flow cytometry studies of mutant protein function. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study subjects were two Turkish sisters with hypergonadotropic primary amenorrhea, their parents and two unaffected sisters. The affected siblings and both parents were sequenced (trio-WES). Transient transfection of HEK 293T cells was performed with a vector containing wild-type FSHR as well as the novel FSHR variant that was discovered by WES. Cellular localization of FSHR protein as well as FSH-stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) production was evaluated using flow cytometry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Both affected sisters were homozygous for a previously unreported missense mutation (c.1222G>T, p.Asp408Tyr) in the second transmembrane domain of FSHR. Modeling predicted disrupted secondary structure. Flow cytometry demonstrated an average of 48% reduction in cell-surface signal detection (P < 0.01). The mean fluorescent signal for cAMP (second messenger of FSHR), stimulated by FSH, was reduced by 50% in the mutant-transfected cells (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is an in vitro validation. All novel purported genetic variants can be clinically reported only as 'variants of uncertain significance' until more patients with a similar phenotype are discovered with the same variant. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We report the first WES-discovered FSHR mutation, validated by quantitative flow cytometry. WES is a valuable tool for diagnosis of rare genetic diseases, and flow cytometry allows for quantitative characterization of purported variants. WES-assisted diagnosis allows for treatments aimed at the underlying molecular etiology of disease. Future studies should focus on pharmacological and assisted reproductive treatments aimed at the disrupted FSHR, so that patients with FSH resistance can be treated by personalized medicine. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: E.V. is partially funded by the DSD Translational Research Network (NICHD 1R01HD068138). M.S.B. is funded by the Neuroendocrinology, Sex Differences and Reproduction training grant (NICHD 5T32HD007228). The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
Authors: Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Fatih Gurbuz; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Elizabeth P Jeffries; L Damla Kotan; Urvashi Surti; Deborah M Ketterer; Jelena Matic; Jacqueline Chipkin; Huaiyang Jiang; Michael A Trakselis; A Kemal Topaloglu; Aleksandar Rajkovic Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Sarah B Pierce; Ksenija Gersak; Rachel Michaelson-Cohen; Tom Walsh; Ming K Lee; Daniel Malach; Rachel E Klevit; Mary-Claire King; Ephrat Levy-Lahad Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: V A Arboleda; H Lee; F J Sánchez; E C Délot; D E Sandberg; W W Grody; S F Nelson; E Vilain Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: A De Leener; L Montanelli; J Van Durme; Heedong Chae; G Smits; G Vassart; S Costagliola Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-11-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: P Touraine; I Beau; A Gougeon; G Meduri; A Desroches; C Pichard; M Detoeuf; B Paniel; M Prieur; J R Zorn; E Milgrom; F Kuttenn; M Misrahi Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 1999-11
Authors: Kemal O Yariz; Tom Walsh; Asli Uzak; Michail Spiliopoulos; Duygu Duman; Gogsen Onalan; Mary-Claire King; Mustafa Tekin Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: S Kallio; K Aittomäki; T Piltonen; R Veijola; A Liakka; T E Vaskivuo; L Dunkel; J S Tapanainen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Linda A Allen; John C Achermann; Pirjo Pakarinen; Thomas J Kotlar; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; J Larry Jameson; Tim D Cheetham; Stephen G Ball Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: M Ghadami; S A Salama; N Khatoon; R Chilvers; M Nagamani; P J Chedrese; A Al-Hendy Journal: Mol Hum Reprod Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Emmanuèle C Délot; Jeanette C Papp; David E Sandberg; Eric Vilain Journal: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Ho Long Le; Vu Ngoc Anh Ho; Tam Thi Ngan Le; Van Thi Thu Tran; Mai Pham Que Ma; Anh Hoang Le; Linh Khanh Nguyen; Tuong Manh Ho; Lan Ngoc Vuong Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Arlene J George; Bin Dong; Hannah Lail; Morgan Gomez; Yarely C Hoffiz; Christopher B Ware; Ning Fang; Anne Z Murphy; Erik Hrabovszky; Desiree Wanders; Angela M Mabb Journal: iScience Date: 2022-05-10
Authors: Sarah Eskenazi; Anne Bachelot; Justine Hugon-Rodin; Genevieve Plu-Bureau; Anne Gompel; Sophie Catteau-Jonard; Denise Molina-Gomes; Didier Dewailly; Catherine Dodé; Sophie Christin-Maitre; Philippe Touraine Journal: J Endocr Soc Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Paul Laissue; Besma Lakhal; Magalie Vatin; Frank Batista; Gaëtan Burgio; Eric Mercier; Esther Dos Santos; Christophe Buffat; Diana Carolina Sierra-Diaz; Gilles Renault; Xavier Montagutelli; Jane Salmon; Philippe Monget; Reiner A Veitia; Céline Méhats; Marc Fellous; Jean-Christophe Gris; Julie Cocquet; Daniel Vaiman Journal: Open Biol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 6.411
Authors: Asma Sassi; Julie Désir; Véronique Janssens; Martina Marangoni; Dorien Daneels; Alexander Gheldof; Maryse Bonduelle; Sonia Van Dooren; Sabine Costagliola; Anne Delbaere Journal: F S Rep Date: 2020-08-22