Literature DB >> 34095689

Next Generation Sequencing Should Be Proposed to Every Woman With "Idiopathic" Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.

Sarah Eskenazi1,2, Anne Bachelot2,3, Justine Hugon-Rodin4,5,6, Genevieve Plu-Bureau4,5,6, Anne Gompel4,5, Sophie Catteau-Jonard7, Denise Molina-Gomes8, Didier Dewailly7, Catherine Dodé9, Sophie Christin-Maitre1,2,10, Philippe Touraine2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects 1% of women under 40 years of age. POI is idiopathic in more than 70% of cases. Though many candidate genes have been identified in recent years, the prevalence and pathogenicity of abnormalities are still difficult to establish.
OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of gene variations in a large prospective multicentric POI cohort. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the correlation between phenotype and genotype.
METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine well-phenotyped POI patients were screened for variants of 18 known POI genes (BMP15, DMC1, EIF2S2, FIGLA, FOXL2, FSHR, GDF9, GPR3, HFM1, LHX8, MSH5, NOBOX, NR5A1, PGRMC1, STAG3, XPNPEP2, BHLB, and FSHB) by next generation sequencing (NGS). Abnormalities were classified as "variant" or "variant of unknown signification" (VUS) according to available functional tests or algorithms (SIFT, Polyphen-2, MutationTaster).
RESULTS: One hundred and two patients (38%) were identified as having at least 1 genetic abnormality. Sixty-seven patients (25%) presented at least 1 variant. Forty-eight patients presented at least 1 VUS (18%). Thirteen patients (5%) had combined abnormalities. NOBOX variants were the most common gene variants involved in POI (9%). Interestingly, we saw no significant differences in the previous family history of POI, ethnic origin, age at onset of POI, primary amenorrhea, or secondary menstrual disturbances between the different genotypes.
CONCLUSION: In our study, a high percentage of patients presented gene variants detected by NGS analysis (38%). Every POI patient should undergo NGS analysis to improve medical cares of the patients.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primary ovarian insufficiency; genetic results; next generation sequencing; phenotype

Year:  2021        PMID: 34095689      PMCID: PMC8169040          DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Primary (premature) ovarian insufficiency (POI) is defined as a loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40, and is characterized by menstrual disturbances (amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea) with elevated gonadotropins (follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] ≥ 25 IU/L) and low serum estradiol levels [1].The incidence of POI is around 1 per 100 women [2, 3]overall, and 1 per 1000 women under the age of 30 years [4]. POI leads to infertility and an increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease [5, 6]. Different mechanisms are known to be involved in the pathogenesis of POI: decreased primordial follicular pool at birth, accelerated follicular atresia, or a dysfunction of follicular growth [7]. Several causes of POI have been identified, including autoimmunity or iatrogenic causes like chemotherapy or ovarian surgery [8]. Some authors have also suggested environmental causes [9, 10]. Genetic disorders involved include not only Turner syndrome (4-5% of cases of POI) and FMR1 (Fragile X Mental Retardation type 1) gene premutation (3% to 15% of cases of POI) [11], but also monogenic disorders (syndromic or nonsyndromic) [12, 13]. Around 70% of cases remain unexplained [11], though some of these cases of idiopathic POI may be linked to genetic abnormalities. In recent years, new genetic screening techniques have identified genetic alterations that may be linked to POI. Many familial studies have identified mutations involved in POI [14-17], and a few cohort studies have described variants of candidate genes or copy number variants [18-23]. Interestingly, a few studies have reported the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze a panel of candidate genes in patients with POI [24-26]. The prevalence of known genetic alterations is estimated at 20% to 25% [7]. The primary goal of our study was to describe the prevalence of genetic abnormalities of 18 candidate genes by NGS in a large cohort of 269 POI patients. The secondary goal was to evaluate the correlation between those abnormalities and the patients’ phenotype.

Materials and Methods

Patients

From January 2015 to January 2017, all patients newly diagnosed with POI in 5 different Reproductive Medicine Centers in France (La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Port-Royal Hospital in Paris, Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye Hospital, and Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille) were included in this study. POI was diagnosed based on amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea associated with FSH levels above 25 IU/L and low serum estradiol levels, before the age of 40. Every patient underwent karyotyping of at least 20 cells and a FMR1 molecular analysis. We excluded patients found to have Turner syndrome based on the karyotype or any other karyotype abnormality, as well as patients with a FMR1 premutation. Patients who previously underwent a gonadotoxic treatment (chemotherapy or pelvic radiation) or extensive ovarian surgery were also excluded from the study. All patients signed an informed consent form. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Clinical Data

Ethnic origin, family history of POI (at least 1 first-degree female relative with POI according to the patient), pubertal development, menstrual history (primary amenorrhea or secondary menstrual disturbance), and prior spontaneous pregnancies were recorded during the medical consultations at diagnosis. Clinical symptoms suggesting syndromic POI were evaluated and any personal history of autoimmune disorders was noted. Furthermore, tests were done for 21-hydroxylase antibodies, ovarian antibodies, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, thyroglobulin antibodies, glutamate decarboxylase antibodies, antibodies common in celiac disease and lupus antibodies.

DNA Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted either from the patient’s blood cells or from a derived lymphoblastoid. The 18 genes studied were selected because of their potential implication in POI according to previous studies (Table 1). We tested for mutations in the coding exons and abutting splice sites of BMP15 (NM_005448.2), DMC1 (NM-007068.3), EIF2S2 (NM_003908.2), FIGLA (NM_001004311.3), FOXL2 (NM-023067.3), FSHR (NM_000145.3), GDF9 (NM_005260.5), GPR3 (NM_005281.3), HFM1 (NM_001017975.4), LHX8 (NM_00100933.1), MSH5 (NM-172165.3), NOBOX (NM_001080413.3), NR5A1 (NM_004959.4), PGRMC1 (NM_006667.4), STAG3 (NM_001282717.1), BHLHB9 (NM_001142528), FSHB (NM_001018080), and XPNPEP2 (NM_003399.5) using the Ion Torrent semiconductor sequencing technique. The primers were designed using the Ampliseq Designer software. The libraries were prepared from 50 ng of genomic DNA using the Ion Plus fragment library kit. Adapter ligation, nick repair, and amplification were performed according to the Ion Torrent protocol (Life Technologies). The Ion One Touch template kit was used for the emulsion polymerase chain reaction and enrichment steps. Sequencing of the amplicon libraries was done on the Ion Torrent PGM system with 316 chips, and the Ion Xpress barcode adapters kit was used for the barcoding. Version 2 of the Ion sequencing kit was used for all sequencing reactions, according to the recommended protocol. After sequencing, reads were mapped to the human genome 19 assembly with the Torrent mapping alignment program. Single-nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions (indels) were identified using Torrent Variant Caller (Life Technologies) and Nextgene software [27]. All the mutations detected were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of new polymerase chain reaction products.
Table 1.

A panel of 18 candidate genes

GeneslocationFunction(s)Reference of human POI description and functional study
BHLHB9 (NM_001142528) Xq22.1[28]
BMP15 (NM_005448.2) Xp11.2Follicular activation, development and maturation, cell division[44]
DMC1 (NM-007068.3) 22q13.1Meiosis [45]
EIF2S2 (NM_003908.2) EIF2B2-14q24.3; EIF2B4-2p23.3; EIF2B5-3q27.1Cell death, damage, autophagy[29]
FIGLA (NM_001004311.3) 2p13.3Oogenesis[46]
FOXL2 (NM-023067.3) 3q23Gonadogenesis–oogenesis[47]
FSHR (NM_000145.3) 2p21-p16Follicular activation, development and maturation, hormonal support[48]
GDF9 (NM_005260.5) 5q31.1Follicular activation, development and maturation, cell division[49]
GPR3 (NM_005281.3) 1p36.1-p35Meiosis [30, 34]
HFM1 (NM_001017975.4) 1p22.2DNA division and repair[50]
LHX8 (NM_00100933.1) 1p31.1Oogenesis [24]
MSH5 (NM-172165.3) 6p21.3Meiosis[45]
NOBOX (NM_001080413.3) 7q35Gonadogenesis–oogenesis, follicular activation, development and maturation[51]
NR5A1 (NM_004959.4) 9q33Gonadogenesis–oogenesis[52]
PGRMC1 (NM_006667.4) Xq24Hormonal support[32]
STAG3 (NM_001282717.1) 7q22.1Cell division[16]
FSHB (NC_000011.10) 11p14.1Follicular activation, development and maturation, hormonal support[31, 33, 53]
XPNPEP2 (NM_003399.5) Xq25[54]
A panel of 18 candidate genes

Nomenclature and In Silico Analyses of the Mutations

The effects of the missense variants were considered based on the results of functional tests described previously (when available). In the absence of a functional study, the effects of the missense variants were predicted using 3 different algorithms: Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) (sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_enst_submit.html), PolyPhen-2 (genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). The SIFT and PolyPhen-2 algorithms give scores ranging from 0 to 1. A mutation is predicted as “deleterious” by SIFT if its score is below 0.05; otherwise it is predicted as “tolerated”. A mutation is predicted as “possibly damaging” by PolyPhen-2 if its score is greater than 0.15, and as “probably damaging” if it is greater than 0.85; otherwise it is predicted as “benign”. The Mutation Taster algorithm indicates the probability of an alteration being a polymorphism or a disease-causing alteration. The scores range from 0 to 1, with a score of 1 indicating a high security of prediction. We considered an alteration as pathogenic or a polymorphism based on the results of functional tests described previously. When no such tests had been done previously, we considered a missense variant as pathogenic when 2 of the 3 algorithms (SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationTaster) gave identical results. Missense variants can also affect the splicing of the primary transcripts. These effects of each missense variant were predicted using the MaxEntScan scoresplice (genes.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html), NNSplice (omictools.com/nnsplice-tool), and Human Splicing Finder (rd-connect.eu/tools-resources/human-splicing-finder) algorithms.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were done using SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The Student test and χ 2 test were used to assess the differences in the characteristics of the women between 2 groups according to genotype. The data are presented as a percentage (for qualitative variables) or mean and SD for quantitative variables. P < .05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Description of the Population

We included 269 consecutive patients diagnosed with POI. As shown in Table 2, 126 patients (52%) were of Caucasian origin, 57 (23%) came from sub-Saharan Africa, 50 (20%) were from North Africa, and 13 (5%) came from Asia (missing data N = 23). Forty-three patients (16%) had a family history of POI (missing data N = 5). Primary amenorrhea (PA) was observed in 34 patients (13%) and 229 patients (87%) (missing data N = 6) had a secondary menstrual disturbance (SMD) (amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea). Among the patients with PA, the prevalence of those with or without spontaneous pubertal development was 25% (N = 8) and 19% (N = 6) respectively. Eighteen patients (56%) had incomplete pubertal development (missing data N = 2). An SMD occurred before the age of 20 years in 30 patients (15%), between the age of 20 and 29 years in 47 patients (23%) and between the age of 30 and 39 years in 127 patients (62%). Ninety-six patients (37%) had been pregnant before the diagnosis of POI (missing data N = 25). Fifty-seven patients (23.5%) showed signs of autoimmunity (59% with thyroid antibodies).
Table 2.

Clinical data of the cohort (N = 269 women)

N (%)
Ethnic origin
 Caucasian126/246 (52)
 North Africa50/246 (20)
 Sub-Saharan Africa57/246 (23)
 Asia13/246 (5)
Familial history of POI 43/264(16)
Primary amenorrhea34/263 (13)
 No pubertal development6/32 (19)
 Incomplete pubertal development18/32 (56)
 Complete pubertal development8/32 (25)
Age at secondary menstrual disturbance (years)
 <20 30/204 (15)
 20-29 47/204 (23)
 30-39 127/204(62)
Pregnancy before POI96/259 (37)

Abbreviation: POI, primary ovarian insufficiency.

Clinical data of the cohort (N = 269 women) Abbreviation: POI, primary ovarian insufficiency.

NGS Results

The NGS results are presented in Table 3. One hundred and two patients (38%) presented at least 1 abnormality, of 1 to 5 genes each. Forty-eight patients (18%) presented a VUS. Sixty-seven (25%) had at least 1 variant. Thirteen patients (5%) had at least 1 variant and 1 VUS.
Table 3.

Variants found in the cohort

GeneDNA mutationProtein alterationrs numberPolyphen-2 (score)Sift (score)Mutation taster (p-value)Functional testNo. of patientsPA/SMD
NOBOX c.131G>Tp.Arg44Leurs115206969B (0)NSP (1)No effect [24, 55]. Protein instability [56]3 0/3
c.349C>Tp.Arg117Trprs7800847B (0.35)D (0,02)DC (0)↘ transcriptional activity [24, 35, 55]71/6
c.454G>Ap.Gly152Argrs201806397B (0)T (0,79)P (1)↘ transcriptional activity [56]30/3
c.1354G>Ap.Asp452Asnrs112190116B (0)T (1)P (1)No effect [24, 55] ? transcriptional activity [56]41/3
c.271G>Tp.Gly91Trprs77587352D (0,98)NSDC (0)↘ transcriptional activity [24, 35, 55]5 (+/–) 1 (+/+)2/3 1/0
c.1064G>Cp.Arg355Prors201947677D (0.99)D (0)DC (1)p.Arg355His disrupts DNA binding [51]10/1
BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148Prors114823607D (0,983)D (0,97)P (0.89)Disrupted mature protein secretion [57]8 (+/–) 1 (+/+)0/7 0/1a
HFM1 c.11C>Ap.Ser4ars376463557NSNSNS11 /0
c.1477A>Cp.Lys493Glnrs113908392D (0,95)D (0)DC (0.99)31/2
c.2308G>Ap.Asp770Asnrs143399622D (0,93)T (0,08)DC (1)10/1
NR5A1 c.43G>Ap.Val15Metrs104894124D (0,99)D (0)DC (1)↘DNA binding and transcriptional activity [58]10/1
c.386C>Tp.Pro129Leurs200749741B (0,12)D (0)DC (0)↘ transcriptional activity [52]11 /0
c.772C>Tp.Gln258aNOVELNSNSNSTruncated and/or unstable protein10/1
c.1093C>Tp.Arg365TrpNOVELD (0,94)D (0)DC (1)20/2
STAG3 c.659T>Gp.Leu220ArgNOVELD (0,99)D (0)DC (1)11/0
c.938A>Tp.Tyr313PheNOVELD (0,93)T (0.15)DC (1)11 /0
c.1999C>Tp.Arg667Cysrs141693812B (0,37)D (0,01)DC (1)11/0
c.2473C>Gp.Leu825Valrs764688962D (0,84)T (0,4)DC (1)10/1
c.2612G>Ap.Arg871HisNOVELD (0,98)T (0,07)DC (1)10/1
GDF9 c.1275C>Ap.Ser425Argrs116926261D (0,53)T (0,5)NDPathogenic [59]10/1
c.1360C>Tp.Arg454Cysrs61754582D (0,99)D (0,01)ND30/3
MSH5 C.138-9insGAGp.Glu46duprs781096458NSNSNSPotential splicing modification (HSF –8.7%) 10/1
c.416-1G>Ap.?NOVEL10/1
c.952-2A>Gp.?rs14345383410/1
FOXL2 c.384G>Tp.Trp128CysNOVELD (0,98)D (0)DC (1)10/1
XPNEP2 c.754C>Gp.Arg252Glyrs189381278D (0.99)D (1)DC (0,98)10/1
c.1154A>Gp.Lys385Argrs145287846D (0,99)T (0,05)DC (0,98)10/1
FIGLA c.274G>Ap.Val92MetNOVELD (0,99)D (0)DC (1)10/1
DMC1 c.449G>Ap.Gly150Asprs58396845D (0,92)D (0)DC (1)11/0
c.598A>Gp.Met200Valrs2227914B (0)D (0)P (1)Unstable protein [38]191/17a
FSHR c.334A>Cp.Asn112Hisrs201909194D (0,90)T (0,42)P (0,85)10/1
c.1330G>Ap.Ala444Thrrs202162496B (0,07)D (0)DC (1)10/1
LHX8 c.974C>Tp.Ala325Valrs34889650D (0,82)T (0,15)DC (1)10/1

Abbreviations, B, benign; D, damaging; HSF, heat shock transcription factor; T, tolerated; NS, not scored; P, polymorphism; DC, disease causing; +/–, heterozygous; –/–, homozygous; PA, primary amenorrhea; SMD, secondary menstrual disturbance.

Missing data N = 1.

Variants found in the cohort Abbreviations, B, benign; D, damaging; HSF, heat shock transcription factor; T, tolerated; NS, not scored; P, polymorphism; DC, disease causing; +/–, heterozygous; –/–, homozygous; PA, primary amenorrhea; SMD, secondary menstrual disturbance. Missing data N = 1. Among the 18 genes tested, variants were identified for only 13 genes (Table 3) and 1 to 6 different variants were found for each. NOBOX variants were the most common autosomal gene variant (N = 24; 9% of the patients). Twenty patients shared DMC1 variants (7%). Nine patients presented BMP15 (3%) variants, 6 for HFM1 (2%), 5 for NR5A1 (2%), 5 for STAG3 (2%), 2 for XPNPEP2 (0.7%), 4 for GDF9 (1.5%), 3 for MSH5 (1%), 2 for FSHR (0.7%), and 1 for FOXL2 and FIGLA. Fourteen patients (5.2%) had 2 to 4 variants, of which 2 had homozygous variants (BMP15 and NOBOX) (Table 4).
Table 4.

Patients with combined variants. N = 14

Patients with combined variantsGenesDNA mutationProtein alterationPA or SMDFamilial POI
1 BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148ProSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
2 STAG3 c.938A>Tp.Tyr313PhePANo
c.1999C>Tp.Arg667CysNo
3 BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148ProSMDNo
NOBOX c.349C>Tp.Arg117TrpNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
XPNP2 c.754C>Gp.Arg252GlyNo
4 NR5A1 c.386C>Tp.Pro129LeuPANo
HFM1 c.11C>Ap.Ser4aNo
5 NOBOX c.349C>Tp.Arg117TrpSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
6 FSHR c.334A>Cp.Asn112HisSMDNo
HFM1 c.1477A>Cp.Lys493GlnNo
7 HFM1 c.1477A>Cp.Lys493GlnSMDNo
LHX8 c.974C>Tp.Ala325ValNo
8 NOBOX c.131G>Tp.Arg44LeuSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
FIGLA c.274G>Ap.Val92MetNo
9 NOBOX c.349C>Tp.Arg117TrpSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
10 NOBOX c.131G>Tp.Arg44LeuSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
11 BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148ProSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
12 NOBOX c.131G>Tp.Arg44LeuSMDNo
DMC1 c.598A>Gp.Met200ValNo
13 BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148ProSMDNo
BMP15 c.443T>Cp.Leu148ProNo
14 NOBOX c.271G>Tp.Gly91TrpPANo
NOBOX c.271G>Tp.Gly91TrpNo

Abbreviations: SMD, secondary menstrual disturbance; PA, primary amenorrhea; POI, primary ovarian insufficiency.

Patients with combined variants. N = 14 Abbreviations: SMD, secondary menstrual disturbance; PA, primary amenorrhea; POI, primary ovarian insufficiency.

Phenotype According to Genotype

In the cases of PA, 32% of the patients presented with variants and most of those concerned the NOBOX gene (45%). In the patients with an SMD, 24% had a variant. Among the entire POI cohort, for every variant identified, the clinical presentation of the POI most often involved an SMD, except for the STAG3 variants that were associated with PA in 60% of the cases (Table 3). Fifty-six percent of the patients from sub-Saharan Africa had a genetic variant (50% for DMC1 and 42% for NOBOX) and 58% of the patients with NOBOX variants originated from sub-Saharan Africa. Among the patients with a family history of POI, 21% presented with variants and most of them involved DMC1 (40%), followed by NOBOX and NR5A1 (20% each). The phenotype/genotype analysis, as shown in Table 5, found no statistical difference between patients with or without variants regarding ethnic origin, familial history of POI, PA, age at the onset of an SMD, and previous history of natural pregnancy. As NOBOX variants were the variants most commonly observed, the patients with only NOBOX variants (heterozygous N = 17, homozygous N = 1) were compared with those without the variant (Table 5). There was no statistically significant difference regarding phenotype between patients with NOBOX variants and patients without variant. Furthermore, phenotype was not different in patient presenting 1 variant compared to patients with combined variants (data not shown). The sole patient with a variant of the FOXL2 gene presented with blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome.
Table 5.

Clinical characteristics of POI patients with or without variant found in NGS sequencing

No variant N (%)All variants N (%) P a NOBOX Variantsb N (%) P c
Total20267 18
Ethnic origin
 Caucasian99/183 (54)27/63 (43)9/17 (53)
 North Africa48/183 (26)2/63 (3)NS1/17 (6)NS
 Sub-Saharan Africa25/183 (14)32/63 (51)7/17 (41)
 Asian11/183 (6)2/63 (3)0
Familial POI33 /197 (17)10/67 (15)NS1 /18 (6)NS
Primary amenorrhea23/201 (11)11/65 (17)NS5/18 (28).11
Age at secondary menstrual disturbance (years old)
 <20 24/155 (15)6/49 (12)1/13 (8)
 20-29 29/155 (19)18/49 (37)NS5/13 (38)NS
 30-39102/155 (66)25/49 (51)7/13 (54)
Spontaneous pregnancy before POI71/194 (37)25/65 (38)NS5 /18 (28) NS

Abbreviations: NGS, next generation sequencing; NS, not significant; POI, primary ovarian insufficiency.

P all variants versus no variant.

Excluding patients with combined variant in other genes.

P NOBOX variant versus no variant.

Clinical characteristics of POI patients with or without variant found in NGS sequencing Abbreviations: NGS, next generation sequencing; NS, not significant; POI, primary ovarian insufficiency. P all variants versus no variant. Excluding patients with combined variant in other genes. P NOBOX variant versus no variant. In our cohort, 38% of patients with at least 1 variant had a spontaneous pregnancy before the diagnosis of POI. Among the 24 patients with a NOBOX variant, 8 had been pregnant. All were heterozygous for the NOBOX variant, but 3 had additional variants of other genes such as DMC1 for patient 1, DMC1 and FIGLA for patient 2, and BMP15, XPNPEP2 and DMC1 for patient 3. Among the 9 patients with BMP15 variants, 5 had been pregnant. All were heterozygous for the BMP15 variant but 2 had additional variants of other genes such as DMC1 for 1 of them. The other patient has been described previously as having a NOBOX variant.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to report NGS results and the correlation between genotype and phenotype in a POI cohort, after excluding other identified POI etiologies, such as iatrogenic POI, Turner syndrome and patients with FMR1 premutation. Only a few studies have tested POI patients using NGS technology to date. Fonseca et al. reported an NGS analysis combined with Sanger sequencing that found 4 variants of 3 genes in a small cohort of 12 POI patients [26]. Bouilly et al. screened a cohort of 100 POI patients for 19 loci. Nineteen percent of the patients were identified with at least 1 variant [24]. In a cohort including 69 patients, Patiño et al. found 48% of patients with variants of 49 genes among the 420 candidate POI genes tested using NGS combined with Sanger sequencing [19]. None of these studies included a statistical genotype/phenotype analysis. We used NGS to determine that 38% of our patients had at least 1 variant that may be involved in the onset of POI, though it is difficult to establish causality between genetic abnormalities found by NGS and POI. Interestingly, none of our POI patients presented variants of 5 genes that have previously been implicated in the pathophysiology of POI (EIF2S2, GPR3, PGRMC1, BHLHB9, FSHB) [28-34]. This suggests that these genetic variants are not a major cause of POI. Upon analysis of our patients’ clinical data with respect to the presence of variants, we did not find any statistically significant difference in the phenotype according to the genotype. With regard to the menstrual cycle, Bouilly et al. reported PA in 20% of mutated patients [24]. In our study, 17% of patients with variants presented with PA. On the other hand, among all POI patients with variants, SMD occurred mainly after the age of 30 (49%). This result is quite unexpected, as deleterious variants could be linked to earlier ovarian deficiency, though this does match the results of Patiño et al., who reported that 62% of cases of secondary amenorrhea occurred after the age of 30 in mutated patients [19]. There does seem to be a relationship with the ethnic origin, as a higher prevalence of POI has been described in the African American population than in Japanese women [3]. In our study, 52% of patients with a variant came from sub-Saharan Africa and 58% of those patients presented a NOBOX variant, though this prevalence may be underestimated because most of our patients were of Caucasian origin. Our NOBOX variant findings are similar to those of the study of Bouilly et al., in which 58% of patients with NOBOX variants came from sub-Saharan Africa [35]. We did not find any NOBOX mutations among Asian patients, as reported previously in 2 cohorts including only Chinese patients [36, 37]. Sixteen percent of our cohort mentioned at least 1 case of POI in the family. According to previous studies, 4% to 31% of cases of POI are familial forms [8]. It is noteworthy that familial cases of POI among our patients did not present more variants than nonfamilial cases, even when there were several variants. However, these data should be viewed with caution as we determined the family history based on questionnaires. Hormonal testing of family members was not available. In our cohort, 37% of patients had been pregnant before the diagnosis of POI. Previous studies have described pregnancy before diagnosis in around 20% of patients [18]. Interestingly, the occurrence of a pregnancy before diagnosis was similar among patients with or without variants. Furthermore, patients with NOBOX and BMP15 mutations (genes known to be involved in folliculogenesis) had been spontaneously pregnant before the diagnosis of POI and some of those were found to have combined variants of different genes. Therefore, other mechanisms may account for the secondary amenorrhea after fertility. Previous studies have suspected and even underscored the polygenic pathogenesis of POI [19, 24]. In our cohort, 5% of patients had more than 1 variant. This is in line with Patiño et al. who used whole exome sequencing to find 5% of patients with 2 mutations [19]. In their study, all genetic disorders were considered together, whereas, in our study, we were able to distinguish between variants and variants of unknown signification. Bouilly et al. found that most patients presenting with PA had 2 genetic defects (3 of 5 patients). In the same study, the mean age at onset of POI was lower in patients with 2 combined variants than in patients with only 1 (17 versus 27) [24]. In contrast, in our study, the age at onset of PA and the age at onset of a secondary menstrual disturbance did not differ between patients with combined variants or with only 1 single variant. Therefore, no gene “dose effect” was not found in our study. There are several possible hypotheses explaining the absence of phenotype/genotype correlations. The first is that all the genes we analyzed have different pathogenicities, which may have influenced our results. Indeed, it is challenging to determine the pathogenicity of each individual genetic abnormality. For example, the DMC1-p.Met200Val variant is common among the African population and has been considered as a polymorphism by other groups, though biochemical analyses have shown that the variant has reduced stability, and is only moderately effective at catalyzing in vitro chromosomal recombination reactions [38]. Moreover, it has been shown that different types of variants of a single gene may result in variable phenotypes [39]. A second hypothesis is the influence of nongenetic factors in the development of POI. Few studies have focused on the possible environmental causes of POI and most of those were animal studies. A recent review of 19 studies (animal and human data) described phthalates, bisphenol A, pesticides, and tobacco as the substances most often reported to have a negative impact on ovarian function, with increased follicular depletion leading to earlier menopause [9]. In their work, Béranger et al. underscored the impact of exposure to 2-bromopropane, perfluorooctanoate and cadmium on ovarian reserve [10]. The study of Gallichio et al. also supports a toxic origin, as it reported a higher prevalence of POI among Caucasian hairdressers using hair dyes without gloves [40]. Environmental causes could modulate the expression of certain genes involved in POI. Our study is interesting for several reasons. To our knowledge this is the largest POI cohort tested with NGS. Our study focused on “idiopathic” POI as we excluded known causes of POI. Patients who presented autoantibodies were not excluded of the analysis. Indeed, positive autoantibodies were mostly represented by anti-thyroid autoantibodies, which are positive in 15% of euthyroid women [41]. Moreover, the autoimmune nature of POI is not always clear since a positive antibody does not mean that there are organic consequences and genetic disorders may be involved in these patients. We performed a thorough genetic analysis to classify the variants as deleterious variants or VUS. We are the first to report that there is no correlation between the patient’s phenotype and genetic results. Our study emphasizes that NGS should be proposed to every POI patient, regardless of their clinical presentation. Finding a mutation in a candidate gene may help to accept the diagnosis of POI, as depression is common in these patients [42]. Furthermore, accepting the diagnosis may improve the patient’s compliance with hormonal replacement therapy, as women with POI often stop their treatment [6]. Finally, identifying a mutation may be particularly relevant for female relatives, to whom fertility preservation could then be proposed. Nevertheless, we should point out the multiple weaknesses of our study. Indeed, although more than 70 genes have been identified as candidate genes in the literature [43], we only tested 18. However, those genes were chosen as the genes most commonly identified previously in women with POI. Several human cases had been reported in the literature for each gene. As for the clinical data, we should remember that determining the age of onset of POI can be challenging because, in some patients, amenorrhea occurs when stopping oral contraceptives to become pregnant. Furthermore, it would have been very useful to evaluate familial cases in greater detail. Studying the segregation of variants among our families with a history of POI could illustrate their involvement in the occurrence of POI. However, DNA samples could not be obtained from the patients’ relatives in most cases. In conclusion, genetic screening would improve the care of patients diagnosed with “idiopathic” POI. Furthermore, performing NGS on POI patients would help geneticists to better understand the pathogenicity of the various genes implicated. One major remaining challenge will be to predict the age of onset of POI in women according to their genetic defect.
  59 in total

1.  Exome sequencing reveals SYCE1 mutation associated with autosomal recessive primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Liat de Vries; Doron M Behar; Pola Smirin-Yosef; Irina Lagovsky; Shay Tzur; Lina Basel-Vanagaite
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Mutations in HFM1 in recessive primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Wenxiang Zhang; Hong Jiang; Bai-Lin Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Impaired protein stability and nuclear localization of NOBOX variants associated with premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Ilaria Ferrari; Justine Bouilly; Isabelle Beau; Fabiana Guizzardi; Alberto Ferlin; Marzia Pollazzon; Mariacarolina Salerno; Nadine Binart; Luca Persani; Raffaella Rossetti
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Physical mapping of nine Xq translocation breakpoints and identification of XPNPEP2 as a premature ovarian failure candidate gene.

Authors:  R L Prueitt; J L Ross; A R Zinn
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2000

5.  Next generation sequencing in women affected by nonsyndromic premature ovarian failure displays new potential causative genes and mutations.

Authors:  Dora Janeth Fonseca; Liliana Catherine Patiño; Yohjana Carolina Suárez; Asid de Jesús Rodríguez; Heidi Eliana Mateus; Karen Marcela Jiménez; Oscar Ortega-Recalde; Ivonne Díaz-Yamal; Paul Laissue
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling analysis reveals deoxyribonucleic acid copy number variations associated with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Azzedine Aboura; Claire Dupas; Gérard Tachdjian; Marie-France Portnoï; Nathalie Bourcigaux; Didier Dewailly; René Frydman; Bart Fauser; Nathalie Ronci-Chaix; Bruno Donadille; Philippe Bouchard; Sophie Christin-Maitre
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  An Application of NGS for Molecular Investigations in Perrault Syndrome: Study of 14 Families and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Justine Lerat; Laurence Jonard; Natalie Loundon; Sophie Christin-Maitre; Didier Lacombe; Cyril Goizet; Cécile Rouzier; Lionel Van Maldergem; Souad Gherbi; Eréa-Nöel Garabedian; Jean-Paul Bonnefont; Philippe Touraine; Isabelle Mosnier; Arnold Munnich; Françoise Denoyelle; Sandrine Marlin
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  L Webber; M Davies; R Anderson; J Bartlett; D Braat; B Cartwright; R Cifkova; S de Muinck Keizer-Schrama; E Hogervorst; F Janse; L Liao; V Vlaisavljevic; C Zillikens; N Vermeulen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Mutations in NR5A1 associated with ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Diana Lourenço; Raja Brauner; Lin Lin; Arantzazu De Perdigo; Georges Weryha; Mihaela Muresan; Radia Boudjenah; Gil Guerra-Junior; Andréa T Maciel-Guerra; John C Achermann; Ken McElreavey; Anu Bashamboo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Environmental pollutants, a possible etiology for premature ovarian insufficiency: a narrative review of animal and human data.

Authors:  Pauline Vabre; Nicolas Gatimel; Jessika Moreau; Véronique Gayrard; Nicole Picard-Hagen; Jean Parinaud; Roger D Leandri
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prognostic prediction and gene regulation network of EIF2S2 in hepatocellular carcinoma based on data mining.

Authors:  Piyou Ji; Haitao Wang; Yu Cheng; Shaohua Liang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

2.  Causal and Candidate Gene Variants in a Large Cohort of Women With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.

Authors:  Bushra Gorsi; Edgar Hernandez; Marvin Barry Moore; Mika Moriwaki; Clement Y Chow; Emily Coelho; Elaine Taylor; Claire Lu; Amanda Walker; Philippe Touraine; Lawrence M Nelson; Amber R Cooper; Elaine R Mardis; Aleksander Rajkovic; Mark Yandell; Corrine K Welt
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Biallelic mutations in PSMC3IP are associated with secondary amenorrhea: expanding the spectrum of premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Fabio Sirchia; Elisa Giorgio; Laura Cucinella; Enza Maria Valente; Rossella E Nappi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  ZSWIM7 Is Associated With Human Female Meiosis and Familial Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.

Authors:  Sinéad M McGlacken-Byrne; Polona Le Quesne Stabej; Ignacio Del Valle; Louise Ocaka; Andrey Gagunashvili; Berta Crespo; Nadjeda Moreno; Chela James; Chiara Bacchelli; Mehul T Dattani; Hywel J Williams; Dan Kelberman; John C Achermann; Gerard S Conway
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.134

5.  Whole-exome sequencing reveals new potential genes and variants in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Ayberk Turkyilmaz; Ceren Alavanda; Esra Arslan Ates; Bilgen Bilge Geckinli; Hamza Polat; Mehmet Gokcu; Taner Karakaya; Alper Han Cebi; Mehmet Ali Soylemez; Ahmet İlter Guney; Pinar Ata; Ahmet Arman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure.

Authors:  Ludmila Volozonoka; Anna Miskova; Liene Kornejeva; Inga Kempa; Veronika Bargatina; Linda Gailite
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Management of a Girl With Delayed Puberty and Elevated Gonadotropins.

Authors:  Sinéad M McGlacken-Byrne; John C Achermann; Gerard S Conway
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Covid-19 and adolescent acute kidney injury: Renal recovery with combined enalapril and estrogen therapy.

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Samuel H Wood; Anthony P H Walsh
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.314

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.