| Literature DB >> 26910279 |
Jyoti Roy1,2, Karson S Putt1, Domenico Coppola3, Marino E Leon3, Farah K Khalil3, Barbara A Centeno3, Noel Clark4, Valerie E Stark5, David L Morse5, Philip S Low1,2.
Abstract
The expression of cholecystokinin 2 receptor (CCK2R, CCKBR or gastrin receptor) has been reported on a diverse range of cancers such as colorectal, liver, lung, pancreatic, ovarian, stomach, thyroid and numerous neuroendocrine/carcinoid tumors. Some cancers of the colorectum, lung, pancreas and thyroid have been shown to overexpress CCK2R in relation to normal matched tissues of the same organ. This reported overexpression has led to the development of a number of CCK2R-ligand targeted imaging and therapeutic agents. However, no comprehensive study comparing the expression of CCK2R in multiple cancers to multiple normal tissues has been performed. Herein, we report the immunohistochemical analysis of cancer samples from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and thyroid cancer against multiple normal tissue samples from esophagus, liver, lung, pancreas, stomach, spleen and thyroid. These results show that CCK2R expression is present in nearly all cancer and normal samples tested and that none of the cancer samples had expression that was statistically greater than that of all of the normal samples.Entities:
Keywords: CCK2R; CCKBR; cholecystokinin 2 receptor; gastrin receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26910279 PMCID: PMC4924738 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Percentages of patient cancer samples testing positive for CCK2R expression by cancer subtype
| Tumor Type | IHC | IHC | From Literature (reference) Ligand Binding | PCR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astrocytomas | 65%(4) | ||||
| Colorectal | 33%(15)/39%(15) | 56%(11) | 11%(12)/38%(9)/44%(7)/69%(5)/100%(8) | ||
| Esophageal | 16%(14) | ||||
| Liver (cholangiocarcinoma) | 90%(17) | ||||
| Liver (fibrolamellar carcinoma) | 90%(17) | ||||
| Liver (hepatocellular carcinoma) | 98% | 91%(17) | 80%(5) | ||
| Lung (non-small cell) | 96% | 8%(5) | 6%(6)/75%(5) | ||
| Ovarian | 100%(4) | ||||
| Pancreatic | 100% | 57%(5)/100%(10) | |||
| Stomach | 56%(37) | 25%(5) | 75% (5)/100%(13) | ||
| Thyroid (non-medullary carcinoma) | 100% | ||||
| Bronchial carcinoids | 62%(18) | ||||
| Carcinoids of the bowels | 30%(18)/67%(19)/88%(5) | 100%(5) | |||
| Carcinoids of the stomach | 100%(22) | 95%(19) | |||
| GIST | 100% | 61%(2) | 100%(5) | 57 %(2)/100%(5) | |
| Lung (non-small cell neuroendocrine tumors) | 100% | 50%(5) | |||
| Lung (small cell) | 78%(5) | 57%(4)/89%(51/100%(6) | |||
| Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors | 95%(16) | 100%(5)/100%(19)/100%(18) | 100%(5) | ||
| Paraganglioma | 33%(19) | ||||
| Thyroid (medullary carcinoma) | 100% | 60%(21) | 92%(20) | 58%(21)/92%(4) |
Literature reports of the expression of CCK2R as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), binding of radiolabeled ligands (ligand binding) or presence of mRNA (PCR/northern blot) are summarized. The percentages of samples positive for CCK2R in the literature are shown in the final three columns. The percentages of samples positive for CCK2R in our IHC studies are shown in the first column.
Figure 1Example IHC images of cancer specimens using the CCK2R specific antibody 6C10G11
Figure 2Proportion of patient cancer samples in each pathology total score category
IHC was performed on tissue sections from various cancers using an antibody raised against CCK2R. The staining intensity and the proportion of tissue staining positive were each graded on a scale of 0 to 3. The pathology total score was derived by multiplying the staining intensity score and the coverage score.
Figure 3IHC staining of CCK2R in cancer and normal tissue specimens
IHC was performed on tissue sections using an antibody raised against CCK2R. The staining intensity and the proportion of tissue staining positive were each graded on a scale of 0 to 3. The pathology total score was derived by multiplying the staining intensity score and the coverage score. The average value for the staining score (A), coverage score (B) and the total score (C) is plotted (error bars represent SEM).
Figure 4Example IHC images of normal tissue specimens using the CCK2R specific antibody 6C10G11
Figure 5Proportion of patient normal tissue specimens in each pathology total score category
IHC was performed on tissue sections from various normal organs using an antibody raised against CCK2R. The staining intensity and the proportion of tissue staining positive were each graded on a scale of 0 to 3. The pathology total score was derived by multiplying the staining intensity score and the coverage score.
Figure 6Differences in CCK2R expression in cancers vs. normal tissue
IHC was performed on tissue sections using an antibody raised against CCK2R. The staining intensity and the proportion of tissue staining positive (coverage score) were each graded on a scale of 0 to 3. The pathology total score was derived by multiplying the staining intensity score and the coverage score. The CCK2R expression of each cancer was compared to each normal tissue. Differences were considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. If the cancer was significantly higher than the normal tissue, the box was colored green and denoted as overexpressed. A significantly lower value in the cancer was colored red and denoted as underexpressed while a grey color represents no statistically significant difference between the cancer and normal tissue. Comparisons between the staining score (A), coverage score (B) and the pathology total score (C) are shown. The p-value is also shown in each corresponding box. Boxes with darker borders represent cancer and normal tissue of the same organ origin.