Rachael B Zuckerman1, Steven H Sheingold1, E John Orav1, Joel Ruhter1, Arnold M Epstein1. 1. From the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC (R.B.Z., S.H.S., E.J.O., J.R., A.M.E.); and the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (E.J.O.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which is included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), applies financial penalties to hospitals that have higher-than-expected readmission rates for targeted conditions. Some policy analysts worry that reductions in readmissions are being achieved by keeping returning patients in observation units instead of formally readmitting them to the hospital. We examined the changes in readmission rates and stays in observation units over time for targeted and nontargeted conditions and assessed whether hospitals that had greater increases in observation-service use had greater reductions in readmissions. METHODS: We compared monthly, hospital-level rates of readmission and observation-service use within 30 days after hospital discharge among Medicare elderly beneficiaries from October 2007 through May 2015. We used an interrupted time-series model to determine when trends changed and whether changes differed between targeted and nontargeted conditions. We assessed the correlation between changes in readmission rates and use of observation services after adoption of the ACA in March 2010. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 3387 hospitals. From 2007 to 2015, readmission rates for targeted conditions declined from 21.5% to 17.8%, and rates for nontargeted conditions declined from 15.3% to 13.1%. Shortly after passage of the ACA, the readmission rate declined quickly, especially for targeted conditions, and then continued to fall at a slower rate after October 2012 for both targeted and nontargeted conditions. Stays in observation units for targeted conditions increased from 2.6% in 2007 to 4.7% in 2015, and rates for nontargeted conditions increased from 2.5% to 4.2%. Within hospitals, there was no significant association between changes in observation-unit stays and readmissions after implementation of the ACA. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission trends are consistent with hospitals' responding to incentives to reduce readmissions, including the financial penalties for readmissions under the ACA. We did not find evidence that changes in observation-unit stays accounted for the decrease in readmissions.
BACKGROUND: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which is included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), applies financial penalties to hospitals that have higher-than-expected readmission rates for targeted conditions. Some policy analysts worry that reductions in readmissions are being achieved by keeping returning patients in observation units instead of formally readmitting them to the hospital. We examined the changes in readmission rates and stays in observation units over time for targeted and nontargeted conditions and assessed whether hospitals that had greater increases in observation-service use had greater reductions in readmissions. METHODS: We compared monthly, hospital-level rates of readmission and observation-service use within 30 days after hospital discharge among Medicare elderly beneficiaries from October 2007 through May 2015. We used an interrupted time-series model to determine when trends changed and whether changes differed between targeted and nontargeted conditions. We assessed the correlation between changes in readmission rates and use of observation services after adoption of the ACA in March 2010. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 3387 hospitals. From 2007 to 2015, readmission rates for targeted conditions declined from 21.5% to 17.8%, and rates for nontargeted conditions declined from 15.3% to 13.1%. Shortly after passage of the ACA, the readmission rate declined quickly, especially for targeted conditions, and then continued to fall at a slower rate after October 2012 for both targeted and nontargeted conditions. Stays in observation units for targeted conditions increased from 2.6% in 2007 to 4.7% in 2015, and rates for nontargeted conditions increased from 2.5% to 4.2%. Within hospitals, there was no significant association between changes in observation-unit stays and readmissions after implementation of the ACA. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission trends are consistent with hospitals' responding to incentives to reduce readmissions, including the financial penalties for readmissions under the ACA. We did not find evidence that changes in observation-unit stays accounted for the decrease in readmissions.
Authors: Mona K Pedersen; Gunnar L Nielsen; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Søren Lundbye-Christensen Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marc D Samsky; Andrew P Ambrosy; Erik Youngson; Li Liang; Padma Kaul; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Finlay A McAlister Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Lauren H Nicholas; Amber Willink; John Mulcahy; Karen Davis; Judith D Kasper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shail Rawal; Janice L Kwan; Fahad Razak; Allan S Detsky; Yishan Guo; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Andreas Laupacis; S V Subramanian; Amol A Verma Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Tudor Borza; Mary K Oerline; Ted A Skolarus; Edward C Norton; Justin B Dimick; Bruce L Jacobs; Lindsey A Herrel; Chad Ellimoottil; John M Hollingsworth; Andrew M Ryan; David C Miller; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert E Burke; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Mark V Williams; Edmondo J Robinson; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; Joshua P Metlay; Grant S Fletcher; Andrew D Auerbach; Jacques D Donzé Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: James Buxbaum; Michael Quezada; Bradford Chong; Nikhil Gupta; Chung Yao Yu; Christianne Lane; Ben Da; Kenneth Leung; Ira Shulman; Stephen Pandol; Bechien Wu Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Jason H Wasfy; Kevin F Kennedy; Frederick A Masoudi; Timothy G Ferris; Suzanne V Arnold; Vinay Kini; Pamela Peterson; Jeptha P Curtis; Amit P Amin; Steven M Bradley; William J French; John Messenger; P Michael Ho; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-09