| Literature DB >> 26909604 |
Gal Markel1,2,3, Massimo Imazio4, Nira Koren-Morag5, Gilli Galore-Haskel1, Jacob Schachter1, Michal Besser1,3, Davide Cumetti6, Silvia Maestroni6, Arie Altman7, Yehuda Shoenfeld8, Antonio Brucato6, Yehuda Adler2,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The immune response plays a significant role in pericarditis, but the mechanisms of disease are poorly defined. Further, efficient monitoring and predictive clinical tools are unavailable. Carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is an immune-inhibitory protein, while MHC class I chain related protein A (MICA) and B (MICB) have an immune-stimulating function. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: MICA; MICB; biomarkers; pericarditis; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26909604 PMCID: PMC4951257 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Basic clinical data
| Parameter | Males | Females | All | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy | 27 | 20 | − | 47 | |
| 48 | 50.4 | 0.73 | 49 | ||
| AP | 29 | 20 | − | 49 | |
| 46.1 | 48.2 | 0.65 | 47 | ||
| RP | 29 | 19 | − | 48 | |
| 46.2 | 48.2 | 0.88 | 47 | ||
| 5.5 | 4.8 | 0.42 | 5.2 | ||
| 5.5 | 3 | 0.13 | 4.5 |
Table describes demographic data of healthy donors, AP and RP patients, selected clinical parameters and concentration of each of the biomarkers.
Figure 1Distribution analysis of inflammatory biomarkers
Distribution analysis of each of the indicated biomarkers according to serum concentrations (y-axis) in each group of subjects: healthy donors (Healthy), acute pericarditis patients (AP), recurrent pericarditis patients (RP), systemic lupus erythematosis patients (SLE), metastatic melanoma (Mel) with or without pericardial involvement (+/− eff). Boxes and Whiskers present all data, horizontal line reflects the median value. Statistical significance was tested with Kruskal-Wallis test: ***denotes P < 0.0001, **denotes P < 0.01 and *denotes P < 0.05.
Figure 2Distribution analysis of biomarkers in healthy donors
(A) Distribution analysis of each of the indicated biomarkers according to serum concentrations (X-axis). Y-axis denotes the number of patients (frequency); (B) Correlation of each biomarker with age among the healthy donors. Correlation was tested with Spearman's test, the R and P values are indicated in each plot.
Figure 3Comparison of biomarker levels between healthy donors and patients
(A) Serum levels of CEACAM1, MICA and MICB among four subject populations: healthy donors (Healthy), acute pericarditis patients (AP), recurrent pericarditis patients (RP), systemic lupus erythematosis patients (SLE) and metastatic melanoma (MM) with or without pericardial involvement (+/− eff). Each dot represents a patient. Statistical significance was tested with Kruskal-Wallis test: ***denotes P < 0.0001, **denotes P < 0.01 and *denotes P < 0.05; (B–D) ROC curves of each biomarker (indicate in the top of the Figure) for each group of patients (indicated in the left). Area Under the Curve (AUC) is indicated in each plot.
Correlations between serum biomarkers and clinical parameters
| A | Age-MICA | Age-MICB | Age-CCM1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| −0.151 | |||
| −0.153 | −0.124 | −0.108 | |
| −0.059 | −0.301 | 0.203 | |
| −0.005 | −0.256 | 0.107 | |
| 0.102 | 0.104 | ||
| 1 | |||
| 1 | 0.091 | ||
| 0.091 | 1 | ||
| −0.059 | 0.1 | ||
| 0.029 | −0.032 | ||
| −0.167 | 0.203 | 0.012 |
Each of the three biomarkers was correlated with age (A) or with the other biomarkers (B) in healthy, AP and RP patients. In addition, each biomarker was correlated with recurrences, age and duration of follow up (time) in RP patients only (C). Correlation was calculated by Spearman's test. The values in the table represent Spearman's R. *denotes p < 0.05, **denotes p < 0.01 and ***denotes p < 0.001.
Correlations between serum biomarkers and RP etiology
| Etiology | N | Median MICA | Median MICB | Median CEACAM1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pg/ml) | (pg/ml) | (ng/ml) | ||
| 3 | 0 | 171 | ||
| 65 | 0 | 151 | ||
| 118 | 317 | 130 | ||
| 179 | 1223 | 133 | ||
| 0.188 | ||||
Patients were categorized into four main etiological groups, as indicated in the table. The median values of the biomarkers for each etiological group are presented. Statistical significance was tested with Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 4Distribution of RP patients exhibiting high values of biomarkers according to etiological groups
Figure shows the percentage of RP patients exhibiting biomarker values in the highest tertile. Patients are categorized in each of the indicated etiological groups.
Association between treatment and serum biomarkers
| N | MICA (pg/ml) | MICB (pg/ml) | CEACAM1 (ng/ml) | Recurrences (median) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 110 | 0 | 124 | 7.0 | |
| 13 | 3 | 138 | 158 | 3.0 | |
| 20 | 3 | 0 | 188 | 3.5 | |
| 4 | 53 | 140 | 156 | 8.0 | |
| 6 | 19 | 92 | 151 | 4.5 | |
| 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
Patients were categorized according to treatment combinations as indicated in the table. Biomarker and recurrence values presented are the median value of the group. Statistical significance was tested with Kruskal-Wallis test.