Literature DB >> 15832772

Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA assays in pericardial fluid for the recognition of neoplastic pericarditis.

M Szturmowicz1, W Tomkowski, A Fijalkowska, W Kupis, A Cieślik, U Demkow, R Langfort, A Wiechecka, T Orlowski, A Torbicki.   

Abstract

A positive cytology result in pericardial fluid is the gold standard for recognition of malignant pericardial effusion. Unfortunately, in 30-50% of patients with malignant pericardial effusion cytological examination of the pericardial fluid is negative. Tumor marker assessment in pericardial fluid may help to recognize malignant pericardial effusion. The aim of our study was to estimate the value of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA measurement in pericardial fluid for the recognition of malignant pericardial effusion. To our knowledge this is the first study on CYFRA 21-1 assessment in pericardial effusion. The examined group consisted of 50 patients with malignant pericardial effusion and 34 patients with non-malignant pericardial effusion. Median CEA concentrations in malignant pericardial effusion and non-malignant pericardial effusion were 80 ng/mL (0-317) and 0.5 ng/mL (0-18.4), respectively (p<0.001). Median CYFRA 21-1 concentrations in malignant pericardial effusion and non-malignant pericardial effusion were 260 ng/mL (5.3-10080) and 22.4 ng/mL (1.87-317.6), respectively (p<0.001). The optimal cutoff value for CYFRA 21-1 in pericardial effusion was 100 ng/mL. CYFRA 21-1 >100 ng/mL or CEA >5 ng/mL were found in 14/15 patients with malignant pericardial effusion and negative pericardial fluid cytology. We therefore strongly recommend the use of CYFRA 21-1 and/or CEA in addition to pericardial fluid cytology for the recognition of malignant pericardial effusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15832772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  6 in total

1.  [Tumor markers in the assessment of malignant and benign pericardial effusion].

Authors:  K Karatolios; B Maisch; S Pankuweit
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Neoplastic pericardial disease: Old and current strategies for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Chiara Lestuzzi
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-26

3.  Diagnostic value of biochemical biomarkers in malignant and non-malignant pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karatolios; Sabine Pankuweit; Bernhard Maisch
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  The value of serum tumour markers in the prediction of aetiology and follow up of patients with pericardial effusion.

Authors:  U Bildirici; U Celikyurt; E Acar; O Bulut; T Sahin; G Kozdag; D Ural
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.167

5.  Increases in serum CYFRA21-1 concentration during successful treatment with crizotinib.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kanaji; Akira Tadokoro; Naoki Watanabe; Takuya Inoue; Tomoya Ishii; Hiroaki Dobashi; Shuji Bandoh
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-03

6.  CEACAM1 and MICA as novel serum biomarkers in patients with acute and recurrent pericarditis.

Authors:  Gal Markel; Massimo Imazio; Nira Koren-Morag; Gilli Galore-Haskel; Jacob Schachter; Michal Besser; Davide Cumetti; Silvia Maestroni; Arie Altman; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Antonio Brucato; Yehuda Adler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.