Literature DB >> 26909375

Quantum yield and lifetime data analysis for the UV curable quantum dot nanocomposites.

Qi Cheng1, Cui Liu1, Wenjun Wei1, Heng Xu1, Qingliang You1, Linling Zou1, Xueqing Liu1, Jiyan Liu1, Yuan-Cheng Cao1, Guang Zheng2.   

Abstract

The quantum yield (QY) and lifetime are the important parameters for the photoluminescent materials. The data here report the changes of the QY and lifetime for the quantum dot (QD) nanocomposite after the UV curing of the urethane acrylate prepolymer. The data were collected based on the water soluble CdTe QDs and urethane acrylate prepolymer. Colloidal QDs were in various concentration from 0.5×10(-3) molL(-1) to 10×10(-3) molL(-1), and 1% (wt%) 1173 was the photoinitiator. The QY before the curing was 56.3%, 57.8% and 58.6% for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively. The QY after the curing was changed to 8.9%, 9.6% and 13.4% for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively. Lifetime data showed that the lifetime was changed from 23.71 ns, 24.55 ns, 23.52 ns to 1.29 ns, 2.74 ns, 2.45 ns for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26909375      PMCID: PMC4735468          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data QY and lifetime are the important parameters for the photoluminescent devices to improve the efficiency [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The data are useful for the insights of the inactions between the nanoparticles and polymer matrix [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The data are valuable for the material synthesis and devices design.

Data

Two figures and one table were provided to show the semiconductor CdTe QDs quantum yield and lifetime data before and after the polymerization of the urethane acrylate.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Fluorescent nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs) are used in various applications such as solar cell and optical-electronic devices [12], [13]. The quantum yield (QY) and lifetime are the important parameters for the material synthesis and device design. The data here report the changes of the quantum yield (QY) and lifetime after the UV curing of the urethane acrylate prepolymer. The experiments were designed based on the water soluble CdTe QDs and hydrophilic prepolymer urethane acrylate; and the urethane acrylate can be polymerized under the UV irradiation.

CdTe QDs synthesis

The QDs were synthesized from the modified method according to the reference [1]. Briefly, 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) was added into the CdCl2 solution in 50 mL of double distilled water in a round-bottomed flask and the pH was adjusted close to 10 in N2 bubbling. Then, the fresh-made NaHTe solution was applied to mix with the CdCl2 solution to reflux. Precipitation and centrifugation was applied to purify the QDs in water.

QD ink preparation

Colloidal QDs was mixed with urethane acrylate in various concentration from 0.5×10−3 molL−1 to 10×10−3 molL−1, and 1173 as the photoinitiator was at the concentration of 1% (wt%). The mixtures were sonicated 30 min before keeping still to remove the air bubbles. Then the QD ink was spread onto the glass slides for the UV irradiation.

UV curing

UV irradiation was carried out in the UV cabin with the 400 W light. The irradiation time was 5 s. Then the film was peeled off from the glass slide.

Data collections

For the QD inks, solution sample holder was applied to measure the QY and lifetime; for the film samples after the UV curing, solid sample holder was applied. For comparisons, samples before and after the UV curable were measured individually for the UY and lifetimes. Before the curing, the three type QDs all increased when the QDs concentration was increased from 0.5×10−3 molL−1 to 2×10−3 molL−1, then decreased when the QDs concentration increased. The QY before the curing was 56.3%, 57.8% and 58.6% for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively (Fig. 1A). The QY after the curing was changed to 8.9%, 9.6% and 13.4% for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1

The QDs loadings effect on the QY of the nanocomposites.

Lifetime data in Table 1 showed that the lifetime was changed from 23.71 ns, 24.55 ns, 23.52 ns to 1.29 ns, 2.74 ns, 2.45 ns for the QDs 510 nm, 540 nm and 620 nm, respectively.
Table 1

The lifetime data.

λem (nm)Before curing (ns)After curing (ns)
51023.711.29
54024.552.74
62023.522.45
Subject areaPhysics, Chemistry
More specific subject areaPhotoluminescent nanocomposite materials
Type of dataTable, text file, figure
How data was acquiredCombined Fluorescence lifetime and steady state Spectrometer, FLSP920
Data formatRaw, Analyzed
Experimental factorsQD colloidal was mixed with urethane acrylate prepolymer in various ratios.
Experimental featuresUV irradiation was employed for 5 s. Samples were directly applied to the Spectrometer for the requisition of data
Data source locationWuhan, China PR
Data accessibilityData is supplied with in this article
  4 in total

1.  Preparation of thermally stable well-dispersed water-soluble CdTe quantum dots in montmorillonite clay host media.

Authors:  Yuan-Cheng Cao
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 8.128

2.  Influence of SiO2 matrix on electronic and optical properties of Si nanocrystals.

Authors:  K Seino; F Bechstedt; P Kroll
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  Enhanced optical property of Au coated polystyrene beads for multi-color quantum dots encoding.

Authors:  Yuan-Cheng Cao; Zhan Wang; Hai-Qiao Wang; Jian-Hao Wang; Xiao-Feng Hua; Xin Jin; Liang Yang; Zhen-Li Huang; Man-Xi Liu; Yuan-Di Zhao
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-03

4.  SF6 plasma etching of silicon nanocrystals.

Authors:  R W Liptak; B Devetter; J H Thomas; U Kortshagen; S A Campbell
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.874

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.