| Literature DB >> 26909337 |
Ebrahim Nasiri1, Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr2, Mohammad Azadbakht2, Jafar Akbari3, Reza Enayati-Fard4, Sohail Azizi5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Burn injury is one of the most health-threatening problems in the world. Malva sylvestris (M. sylvestris) flowers have a high mucilage content and are used as a remedy for cut wound and dermal infected wounds in Iranian folklore Medicine. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of M. sylvestris cream on the second degree burn injury in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Burns; Malva sylvestris; Rats; Silver sulfadiazine; Wound healing
Year: 2015 PMID: 26909337 PMCID: PMC4587603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Scales for the burn wound healing according to histopathological components in M. sylvestris and control groups of second-degree burn
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 1- Extent of granulation tissue (7 parameters) [(-3) -18] | (-3-0) = not healing |
| 2- re-epithelization | 0 = not healing |
| 3-new dermis (5 parameters) | 0 = not healing |
| 4-Sum of three components | [(-3) - 0] = not healing |
Mean weights (gram) of the rats after burn injury in different groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 184±16 | 182±15 | 190±14 | 203±15 | 215±19 | 224±20 |
| N/S | 183±15 | 180±16 | 184±14 | 206±10 | 212±13 | 216±16 |
| SSD | 185±12 | 182±11 | 185±12 | 195±12 | 207±15 | 216±13 |
| MS5% | 186±19 | 185±16 | 195±24 | 201±25 | 215±18 | 224±18 |
| MS1% | 184±17 | 183±17 | 187±19 | 201±16 | 214±11 | 229±9 |
| p value | 0.991 | 0.956 | 0.678 | 0.766 | 0.801 | 0.739 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris
p value of differences between groups.
Mean wound area (cm2) of the animals groups treated with various topical ointments in post burn injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 12.5±3 | 13.3±3 | 11.4±3.7 | 10.8±3 | 7.5±2.9 | 5±1.7 | 1.4±0.8 | 0.4±0.5 |
| N/S | 11.8±2.4 | 12.6±2.1 | 10.6±2.7 | 9±3.1 | 6.7±2 | 4.4±2 | 1±0.8 | 0.2±0.3 |
| SSD 1% | 13.3±2.5 | 13.3±2.5 | 13±1.6 | 12.6±2 | 10.5±1.6 | 5.5±1.5 | 3.1±1.3 | 1.8±0.7 |
| MS 5% | 12.9±3.2 | 13.5±3 | 10±3 | 9.7±2.6 | 4.7±2 | 0.8±0.7 | 0.41±0.44 | 0 |
| MS 10% | 11.6±2.4 | 12±1.9 | 8.7±1.8 | 8.4±2 | 4.5±2 | 0.4±0.5 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0.575 | 0.675 | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: Malva sylvestris.
Figure 1Comparison of histopathology view among M. sylvestris (MS) treatment and control groups on 8th and 21st days after burn injury.( A, A1 = SSD1% group, B, B1= NS, C, C1 = BC, D, D1 = MS 5%, and E, E1= MS 10% group). [basic cream (BC), normal saline (NS), standard silver sulfadiazine treated (SSD 1%), M. sylvestris 5 % (MS5%), and M. sylvestris 10 % (MS 10%) creams], Macrophage infiltration, neovascularization activity and fibroblastic proliferation were better in M. sylvestris, compared with control groups on the 8th day. Moreover, degree of scar formation, collagenization organization, and new dermis formation in M. sylvestris were better in herbal treatment groups in comparison with control groups on 21st day
Extent of granulation tissue examined in different groups on 8th day after burn injury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrophage histocytic infiltration | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Neovascularization | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Fibroblastic proliferation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Matrix mucopolisacharid deposition | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Degree of inflammation | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Extent of bacterial colonization | -1 | -2 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
| Degree of granulation tissue formation | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sum | 10 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 14 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris
Comparison of the percentage of wound contraction among M. sylvestris (MS) and control groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | -7±6.5 | 14.6±16 | 18.4±9.8. | 45.9±9.6 | 63±9.3 | 90.2±3.5 | 97.6±33 | 98.8±1.8 |
| NS | -7±4.2 | 13.4±7.4 | 28±11 | 41.9±6.5 | 65.1±8.5 | 92.6±4.1 | 98.8±1.9 | 99.2±2(32D) |
| SSD 1% | .5±3 | .9±11.6 | 4.5±5.2 | 25.6±8.6 | 61.6±6.7 | 78.8±6.6 | 88±3.4 | 93.2±2 |
| MS 5% | -4±4.3 | 18.6±16.3.5 | 20.6±12 | 58.9±16.2 | 93.2±6.1 | 96.5±.3.4 | 98.3±2.9 | 100 |
| MS 10% | -4%±7.9 | 28±4.6 | 31.4±6.8 | 64.4±10.3 | 97.3±2.9 | 99±1.6 | 100 | 100 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris.
Figure 2Burn wound healing pattern in control groups [normal saline (NS), base cream (BC), and silver sulfadiazine 1% (SSD1%)] and herbal treated groups [M. sylvestris cream 5% and 10% (MS 5%,MS 10%)] in rats. The rate of healing in burn wounds created on rats were measured and photographed at regular intervals in both control groups and herbal treated rats during a 25-day period. Wound healing condition in (MS 10%) and MS 5% from ten rats were completed on 25 days
Figure 3Comparison of the percentage of wound contraction between M. sylvestris and control groups. M.sylvestris (MS) 5% and10% creams treated groupd showed faster time than control groups for wound contraction (BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris
Comparison of the re-epithelialization components between Mavla sylvestris (MS) and control groups on 8th day post-burn injury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| N/S | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SSD 1% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MS 5% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| MS 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris.
Comparison of the new dermis formation between M. sylvestris (MS) and control groups on 21st day post-burn injury time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| N/S | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| SSD 1% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MS 5% | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| MS10% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
BC: Base cream, N/S: Normal saline, SSD: Silver sulfadiazine, MS: M. sylvestris.
The sum of the score of three histopathological components for burn wound healing in M. sylvestris (MS) treatment and control groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 2 | 10 | 4 | 16 |
| NS | 1 | 9 | 5 | 15 |
| SSD 1% | 6 | 11 | 5 | 22 |
| MS 5% | 15 | 12 | 8 | 35 |
| MS 10% | 15 | 14 | 10 | 39 |