| Literature DB >> 24285978 |
Faraidoon Haghdoost1, Mohammad Mehdi Baradaran Mahdavi, Alireza Zandifar, Mohammad Hossein Sanei, Behzad Zolfaghari, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard.
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Pistacia atlantica resin extract on the rat skin burn wound healing. Methods. Thirty-two Wistar rats were divided into four groups and treated by vehicle, 5%, 10%, and 20% concentration of Pistacia atlantica resin extract for 14 days (G1, G2, G3, and G4, resp.). The efficacy of treatment was assessed based on reduction of burn wound size and histological and molecular characteristics. Results. α -Pinene (46.57%) was the main content of essential oil of resin. There were no statistically significant differences between groups according to wound size analysis. The mean histological wound healing scores were not statistically different. Capillary counts of G2 and G3 were significantly higher than those of the G1 (P = 0.042 and 0.032, resp.). NO concentration in wound fluids on the 5th day of study was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.468). But bFGF concentration in G2 and G3 and PDGF concentration in G3 were significantly higher in comparison to G1 (P = 0.043, 0.017, and 0.019, resp.). Conclusion. Our results revealed that Pistacia atlantica resin extract has a concentration-dependent effect on the healing of burn wounds after 14 days of treatment by increasing the concentration of bFGF and PDGF and also through improving the angiogenesis.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24285978 PMCID: PMC3826334 DOI: 10.1155/2013/893425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Macroscopic morphology of skin burn wound created by 10-second application of 1.5 ∗ 1.5 aluminum plaque which was heated to 100 degree centigrade. (a) Macroscopic morphology of the wounds after 14-day treatment by Pistacia atlantica resin extract (b).
Criteria to evaluate histological scores of wound healing for H&E staining.
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1–3 | None to minimal cell accumulation. No granulation tissue or epithelial travel. |
|
| |
| 4–6 | Thin, immature granulation tissue that is dominated by inflammatory cells but has few fibroblasts, capillaries, or collagen deposition. Minimal epithelial migration. |
|
| |
| 7–9 | Moderately thick granulation tissue can range from being dominated by inflammatory cells to more fibroblasts and collagen deposition. Extensive neovascularization. Epithelium can range from minimal to moderate migration. |
|
| |
| 9–12 | Thick, vascular granulation tissue dominated by fibroblasts and extensive collagen deposition. |
Composition of pistacia atlantica resin oil.
| No. | Compound | RI* | %** |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tetramethylcyclopentene | 839 | 0.23 |
| 2 |
| 942 | 46.58 |
| 3 | Camphene | 964 | 2.03 |
| 4 | Verbenene | 967 | 1.73 |
| 5 | Sabinene | 982 | 4.49 |
| 6 |
| 988 | 9.08 |
| 7 | Myrcene | 995 | 0.19 |
| 8 |
| 1009 | 0.49 |
| 9 |
| 1031 | 1.58 |
| 10 |
| 1017 | 0.28 |
| 11 | Methane | 1026 | 0.20 |
| 12 | Para cymene | 1025 | 1.49 |
| 13 | Limonene | 1029 | 3.40 |
| 14 | Cineole | 1031 | 0.38 |
| 15 |
| 1042 | 1.08 |
| 16 |
| 1060 | 0.53 |
| 17 |
| 1070 | 0.38 |
| 18 | Linalool | 1097 | 1.33 |
| 19 |
| 1128 | 1.28 |
| 20 |
| 1143 | 4.05 |
| 21 |
| 1145 | 1.14 |
| 22 |
| 1151 | 6.41 |
| 23 | Pinocarvone | 1164 | 0.30 |
| 24 | Terpineol-4 | 1179 | 1.01 |
| 25 |
| 1191 | 0.78 |
| 26 | Myrtenol | 1196 | 1.73 |
| 27 |
| 1219 | 0.57 |
| 28 | Chrysanthemyl acetate | 1261 | 0.23 |
| 29 | Bornyl acetate | 1284 | 0.38 |
| 30 |
| 1348 | 0.32 |
*Retention indices on HP-5MS capillary column.
**Calculated from TIC data.
Wound size (cm2) analysis of the studied group in first and 14th days of the study.
| First day | 14th day | Wound contraction | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD ( | mean ± SD ( | mean ± SD ( | |
| Control group | 2.36 ± 0.18 (8) | 1.37 ± 0.41 (8) | 41.98 ± 15.93 (8) |
| Group treated by 5% EC | 2.48 ± 0.22 (8) | 1.05 ± 0.48 (8) | 58.17 ± 15.08 (8) |
| Group treated by 10% EC | 2.30 ± 0.31 (8) | 1.00 ± 0.43 (7) | 46.52 ± 16.03 (7) |
| Group treated by 20% EC | 2.47 ± 0.24 (8) | 1.38 ± 0.15 (8) | 43.50 ± 10.23 (8) |
|
†
| 0.389 | 0.133 | 0.091 |
EC: extract concentration. Data are given as percentages, †by comparison of all groups (ANOVA test). n: number of animals.
Wound healing score and capillary count analysis of studied groups after H&E staining.
| Groups | Wound healing score | Capillary count |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 3.28 ± 0.28 | 09.28 ± 1.01 | |
| Group treated by 5% EC | 4.20 ± 0.58 | 15.12 ± 1.74 | 0.042* |
| Group treated by 10% EC | 6.40 ± 1.77 | 15.37 ± 1.23 | 0.032* |
| Group treated by 20% EC | 3.40 ± 0.42 | 13.12 ± 1.55 | 0.274 |
|
††
| 0.066 | 0.026** |
EC: extract concentration. Data are given as mean ± standard error, †comparison of G1 with other groups for capillary count analysis, *significantly different from the control group, **statistically significant difference, ††by comparison of all groups (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 2Histopathology of burn wounds at day 14 stained with H&E (200x). (a) Control group. (b) Group treated by 5% extract concentration. (c) Group treated by 10% extract concentration. (d) Group treated by 20% extract concentration. Stars show capillaries. Small arrows show fibroblasts. Long arrows show granulation.
Evaluation and analysis of bFGF, PDGF and NO concentrations in the wounds fluid in 5th day of the study.
| Groups | bFGF |
| PDGF |
| NO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD ( | mean ± SD ( | mean ± SD ( | |||
| Control group | 50.60 ± 0.43 (7) | 18.64 ± 1.70 (6) | 3.20 ± 0.97 (8) | ||
| Group treated by 5% EC | 52.60 ± 1.71 (8) | 0.043* | 24.58 ± 7.05 (8) | 0.255 | 2.92 ± 0.95 (7) |
| Group treated by 10% EC | 52.90 ± 1.79 (8) | 0.017* | 28.89 ± 4.78 (7) | 0.019* | 5.18 ± 0.61 (8) |
| Group treated by 20% EC | 51.17 ± 1.00 (8) | 0.589 | 24.70 ± 6.96 (8) | 0.240 | 3.68 ± 0.69 (8) |
|
††
| 0.007** | 0.034** | 0.232 |
EC: extract concentration. Data is given as mean ± SD, †comparison of G1 with other groups, concentration (pg/mL), concentration (µmol/mL), *significantly different from the control group, **statistically significant difference, ††by comparison of all groups (ANOVA test). n: number of animals.