Literature DB >> 26907842

Effect of Different Interset Rest Intervals on Performance of Single and Multijoint Exercises With Near-Maximal Loads.

Gilmar W Senna1, Jeffrey M Willardson, Estevão Scudese, Roberto Simão, Cristiano Queiroz, Raoni Avelar, Estélio H Martin Dantas.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of different interset rest intervals on performance of single- and multijoint exercises with near-maximal loads. Fifteen trained men (26.40 ± 4.94 years, 79.00 ± 7.10 kg, 176.6 ± 6.06 cm, 11.80 ± 2.47% body fat, and bench press relative strength: 1.26 ± 0.19 kg·kg of body mass) performed eight sessions (2 exercises × 4 interset rest intervals); each consisting of 5 sets with a 3RM load. The exercises tested were the machine chest fly (MCF) for the single-joint exercise and the barbell bench press (BP) for the multi-joint exercise with 1, 2, 3, and 5 minutes of rest between sets. The results indicated that for the MCF, significantly higher total number of repetitions were completed for the 2- (12.60 ± 2.35 reps; p = 0.027), 3- (13.66 ± 1.84 reps; p = 0.001), and 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.001) vs. the 1-minute (10.33 ± 2.60 reps) protocol. For the BP, a significantly higher total number of repetitions were completed for 3- (11.66 ± 2.79 reps; p = 0.002) and 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.001) vs. the 1-minute protocol (7.60 ± 3.52 reps). In addition, subjects completed significantly higher total number of repetitions for the 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.016) vs. 2-minute (9.53 ± 3.11 reps) protocol. Both exercises presented similar and progressive reductions in repetition performance for all rest protocols along the 5 sets, starting as soon as the second set for the shorter 1-minute rest protocol. In conclusion, to maintain the best consistency in repetition performance, rest intervals of 2 minutes between sets are sufficient for the MCF and 3-5 minutes for the BP. Thus, it appears that longer acute recovery time is needed for a multijoint (core) exercise such as the BP vs. a single-joint (assistance) exercise such as the MCF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26907842     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals.

Authors:  Gilmar Weber Senna; Bernardo Minelli Rodrigues; Daniel Sandy; Estevão Scudese; Antonino Bianco; Estélio Henrique Martin Dantas
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  Higher Muscle Damage Triggered by Shorter Inter-Set Rest Periods in Volume-Equated Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Gilmar Weber Senna; Estélio Henrique Martin Dantas; Estevão Scudese; Paula Paraguassú Brandão; Vitor A Lira; Matheus Baffi; Luiz Claudio Pereira Ribeiro; Roberto Simão; Ewan Thomas; Antonino Bianco
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Action capability constrains visuo-motor complexity during planning and performance in on-sight climbing.

Authors:  Marlene H van Knobelsdorff; Nikki G van Bergen; John van der Kamp; Ludovic Seifert; Dominic Orth
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.221

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.