William B Weeks1, Brent Leininger2, James M Whedon3, Jon D Lurie4, Tor D Tosteson5, Rand Swenson6, Alistair J O'Malley7, Christine M Goertz8. 1. Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH; Director, Health Services and Clinical Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA. Electronic address: wbw@dartmouth.edu. 2. Assistant Professor, Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Instructor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH; Director, Health Services Research, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA. 4. Associate Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH. 5. Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, NH. 6. Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH. 7. Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Biomedical Data Science, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH. 8. Vice Chancellor, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) was associated with lower healthcare costs among multiply-comorbid Medicare beneficiaries with an episode of chronic low back pain (cLBP). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective study of 2006 to 2012 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements for 72326 multiply-comorbid patients aged 66 and older with cLBP episodes and 1 of 4 treatment exposures: chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) alone, CMT followed or preceded by conventional medical care, or conventional medical care alone. We used propensity score weighting to address selection bias. RESULTS: After propensity score weighting, total and per-episode day Part A, Part B, and Part D Medicare reimbursements during the cLBP treatment episode were lowest for patients who used CMT alone; these patients had higher rates of healthcare use for low back pain but lower rates of back surgery in the year following the treatment episode. Expenditures were greatest for patients receiving medical care alone; order was irrelevant when both CMT and medical treatment were provided. Patients who used only CMT had the lowest annual growth rates in almost all Medicare expenditure categories. While patients who used only CMT had the lowest Part A and Part B expenditures per episode day, we found no indication of lower psychiatric or pain medication expenditures associated with CMT. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that older multiply-comorbid patients who used only CMT during their cLBP episodes had lower overall costs of care, shorter episodes, and lower cost of care per episode day than patients in the other treatment groups. Further, costs of care for the episode and per episode day were lower for patients who used a combination of CMT and conventional medical care than for patients who did not use any CMT. These findings support initial CMT use in the treatment of, and possibly broader chiropractic management of, older multiply-comorbid cLBP patients.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) was associated with lower healthcare costs among multiply-comorbid Medicare beneficiaries with an episode of chronic low back pain (cLBP). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective study of 2006 to 2012 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements for 72326 multiply-comorbid patients aged 66 and older with cLBP episodes and 1 of 4 treatment exposures: chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) alone, CMT followed or preceded by conventional medical care, or conventional medical care alone. We used propensity score weighting to address selection bias. RESULTS: After propensity score weighting, total and per-episode day Part A, Part B, and Part D Medicare reimbursements during the cLBP treatment episode were lowest for patients who used CMT alone; these patients had higher rates of healthcare use for low back pain but lower rates of back surgery in the year following the treatment episode. Expenditures were greatest for patients receiving medical care alone; order was irrelevant when both CMT and medical treatment were provided. Patients who used only CMT had the lowest annual growth rates in almost all Medicare expenditure categories. While patients who used only CMT had the lowest Part A and Part B expenditures per episode day, we found no indication of lower psychiatric or pain medication expenditures associated with CMT. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that older multiply-comorbid patients who used only CMT during their cLBP episodes had lower overall costs of care, shorter episodes, and lower cost of care per episode day than patients in the other treatment groups. Further, costs of care for the episode and per episode day were lower for patients who used a combination of CMT and conventional medical care than for patients who did not use any CMT. These findings support initial CMT use in the treatment of, and possibly broader chiropractic management of, older multiply-comorbid cLBPpatients.
Authors: Richard L Liliedahl; Michael D Finch; David V Axene; Christine M Goertz Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Paula A M Weigel; Jason M Hockenberry; Suzanne E Bentler; Brian Kaskie; Fredric D Wolinsky Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Marloes M J G Gerrits; Nicole Vogelzangs; Patricia van Oppen; Harm W J van Marwijk; Henriette van der Horst; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Pain Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Willem Jj Assendelft; Michiel R de Boer; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-02-16
Authors: Roger Chou; Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Donald Casey; J Thomas Cross; Paul Shekelle; Douglas K Owens Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: James M Whedon; Anupama Kizhakkeveettil; Andrew Toler; Todd A MacKenzie; Jon D Lurie; Serena Bezdjian; Scott Haldeman; Eric Hurwitz; Ian Coulter Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: James M Whedon; Anupama Kizhakkeveettil; Andrew Wj Toler; Serena Bezdjian; Daniel Rossi; Sarah Uptmor; Todd A MacKenzie; Jon D Lurie; Eric L Hurwitz; Ian Coulter; Scott Haldeman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468