BACKGROUND: A profound thrombocytopenia limits hepatic xenotransplantation in the pig-to-primate model. Porcine livers also have shown the ability to phagocytose human platelets in the absence of immune-mediated injury. Recently, inactivation of the porcine ASGR1 gene has been shown to decrease this phenomenon. Inactivating GGTA1 and CMAH genes has reduced the antibody-mediated barrier to xenotransplantation; herein, we describe the effect that these modifications have on xenogeneic consumption of human platelets in the absence of immune-mediated graft injury. METHODS: Wild type (WT), ASGR1, GGTA1, and GGTA1CMAH knockout pigs were compared for their xenogeneic hepatic consumption of human platelets. An in vitro assay was established to measure the association of human platelets with liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) by immunohistochemistry. Perfusion models were used to measure human platelet uptake in livers from WT, ASGR1, GGTA1, and GGTA1 CMAH pigs. RESULTS: GGTA1, CMAH LSECs exhibited reduced levels of human platelet binding in vitro when compared with GGTA1 and WT LSECs. In a continuous perfusion model, GGTA1 CMAH livers consumed fewer human platelets than GGTA1 and WT livers. GGTA1 CMAH livers also consumed fewer human platelets than ASGR1 livers in a single-pass model. CONCLUSIONS: Silencing the porcine carbohydrate genes necessary to avoid antibody-mediated rejection in a pig-to-human model also reduces the xenogeneic consumption of human platelets by the porcine liver. The combination of these genetic modifications may be an effective strategy to limit the thrombocytopenia associated with pig-to-human hepatic xenotransplantation.
BACKGROUND: A profound thrombocytopenia limits hepatic xenotransplantation in the pig-to-primate model. Porcine livers also have shown the ability to phagocytose human platelets in the absence of immune-mediated injury. Recently, inactivation of the porcine ASGR1 gene has been shown to decrease this phenomenon. Inactivating GGTA1 and CMAH genes has reduced the antibody-mediated barrier to xenotransplantation; herein, we describe the effect that these modifications have on xenogeneic consumption of human platelets in the absence of immune-mediated graft injury. METHODS: Wild type (WT), ASGR1, GGTA1, and GGTA1CMAH knockout pigs were compared for their xenogeneic hepatic consumption of human platelets. An in vitro assay was established to measure the association of human platelets with liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) by immunohistochemistry. Perfusion models were used to measure human platelet uptake in livers from WT, ASGR1, GGTA1, and GGTA1CMAHpigs. RESULTS:GGTA1, CMAH LSECs exhibited reduced levels of human platelet binding in vitro when compared with GGTA1 and WT LSECs. In a continuous perfusion model, GGTA1CMAH livers consumed fewer human platelets than GGTA1 and WT livers. GGTA1CMAH livers also consumed fewer human platelets than ASGR1 livers in a single-pass model. CONCLUSIONS: Silencing the porcine carbohydrate genes necessary to avoid antibody-mediated rejection in a pig-to-human model also reduces the xenogeneic consumption of human platelets by the porcine liver. The combination of these genetic modifications may be an effective strategy to limit the thrombocytopenia associated with pig-to-human hepatic xenotransplantation.
Authors: James R Butler; Joseph M Ladowski; Gregory R Martens; Matthew Tector; A Joseph Tector Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Jan Schulte Am Esch; Simon C Robson; Wolfram T Knoefel; Stefan B Hosch; Xavier Rogiers Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Christopher Burlak; Leela L Paris; Ray K Chihara; Richard A Sidner; Luz M Reyes; Susan M Downey; A Joseph Tector Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Jose Estrada; Jeffrey Sommer; Bruce Collins; Bashir Mir; Amy Martin; Abby York; Robert M Petters; Jorge A Piedrahita Journal: Cloning Stem Cells Date: 2007
Authors: Prabhjit K Grewal; Satoshi Uchiyama; David Ditto; Nissi Varki; Dzung T Le; Victor Nizet; Jamey D Marth Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-05-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Tho Pham; Christopher J Gregg; Felix Karp; Renee Chow; Vered Padler-Karavani; Hongzhi Cao; Xi Chen; Joseph L Witztum; Nissi M Varki; Ajit Varki Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: B Ekser; C Long; G J Echeverri; H Hara; M Ezzelarab; C C Lin; M E de Vera; R Wagner; E Klein; R F Wolf; D Ayares; D K C Cooper; B Gridelli Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: David K C Cooper; Martin Wijkstrom; Sundaram Hariharan; Joshua L Chan; Avneesh Singh; Keith Horvath; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Arielle Cimeno; Rolf N Barth; John C LaMattina; Richard N Pierson Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David K C Cooper; Ke-Feng Dou; Kai-Shan Tao; Zhao-Xu Yang; A Joseph Tector; Burcin Ekser Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Arielle Cimeno; Wessam Hassanein; Beth M French; Jessica M Powell; Lars Burdorf; Olga Goloubeva; Xiangfei Cheng; Dawn M Parsell; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; Kasinath Kuravi; Todd Vaught; Mehmet C Uluer; Emily Redding; Natalie O'Neill; Christopher Laird; Alena Hershfeld; Ivan Tatarov; Kathryn Thomas; David Ayares; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Richard N Pierson; Rolf N Barth; John C LaMattina Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.907