Literature DB >> 26906011

CORR Insights(®): Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Todd J Albert1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26906011      PMCID: PMC4814421          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4753-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Paul A Anderson; K Daniel Riew; John G Heller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; Vincent C Traynelis; Regis W Haid; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-07-18

3.  Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.

Authors:  Alexander Vaccaro; William Beutler; Walter Peppelman; Joseph M Marzluff; Jason Highsmith; Andrew Mugglin; George DeMuth; Manasa Gudipally; Kelly J Baker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Jeff Zigler; Jack Zigler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Pierce D Nunley; Richard D Guyer; David Musante; Cameron N Carmody; Charles R Gordon; Carl Lauryssen; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Margaret O Boltes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-06-24

6.  Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Fred H Geisler; Kye M Gilder; Christopher Reah; Kelli M Howell; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rick B Delamarter; Jack Zigler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  J Beaurain; P Bernard; T Dufour; J M Fuentes; I Hovorka; J Huppert; J P Steib; J M Vital; L Aubourg; T Vila
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Rick Delamarter; Dan Murrey; Jeffrey Spivak; Michael Janssen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Kristen Radcliff; John Hipp; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; David G Anderson; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.