Literature DB >> 24694684

Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery.

Jeffrey A Rihn1, Kristen Radcliff, John Hipp, Alexander R Vaccaro, Alan S Hilibrand, David G Anderson, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which, if any, radiographic parameters are predictive of clinical outcome after cervical disk replacement (CDR) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is unclear whether radiographic parameters are predictive of outcome after CDR.
METHODS: An analysis of the radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes of the CDR cohort of the Discover artificial cervical disk IDE trial was performed. Clinical outcome measures included Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog pain scale (neck, arm, and shoulder), and SF-36 physical component summary score scores, collected preoperatively and at regularly scheduled postoperative time periods. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were included. The change in outcomes from baseline was determined at each follow-up interval. The following minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds were applied: -7.5 for NDI, -25 for visual analog pain scale, and +4.1 for physical component summary score. Fifty-six radiographic variables were analyzed to identify factors that may be associated with a poor clinical outcome, defined as failure to achieve the MCID in NDI.
RESULTS: A total of 243 patients underwent CDR at 304 levels (182 one level, 61 two level). One hundred seventy-one patients (89 female, 82 male; mean age, 44.2 y; range, 28-67 y) had at least 1-year follow-up. A preoperative disk height of <3.5 mm was associated with a 3.4 times greater risk of not achieving a MCID in NDI (P=0.018). Increasing the functional spinal unit angle by >3 degrees was associated with a 3.5 times greater risk of not achieving a MCID in NDI (P=0.016). There were 21/171 patients (25 levels) who did not achieve the NDI MCID threshold. All of these patients had at least1, and 16/21 of these patients had more than 1 abnormal radiographic finding. Seventy percent of treatment levels had severe or bridging heterotopic ossification at 3-years follow-up, the incidence of which increased linearly with time.
CONCLUSIONS: Several radiographic variables are predictive of clinical outcomes, including decreased preoperative disk space height and excessive postoperative segmental lordosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24694684     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826a0c84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  7 in total

1.  Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Michael S Hisey; Jack E Zigler; Robert Jackson; Pierce D Nunley; Hyun W Bae; Kee D Kim; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  CORR Insights(®): Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Todd J Albert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Accuracy of various fluoroscopic landmarks for determination of midline implant placement within the cervical disc space.

Authors:  Peter B Derman; Erik Waldorff; Nianli Zhang; Ram Haddas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Sean Siburn; Hamadi Murphy; Barrett Woods; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

5.  Long-Term Clinical Experience with Selectively Constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-Level Cervical Disc Disease: Results from Seven-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alexander Vaccaro; William Beutler; Walter Peppelman; Joseph Marzluff; Andrew Mugglin; Prem S Ramakrishnan; Jacqueline Myer; Kelly J Baker
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

6.  Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Hua Chen; Beiyu Wang; Ying Hong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Reginald J Davis; Michael S Hisey; Pierce D Nunley; Gregory A Hoffman; Robert J Jackson; Hyun W Bae; Todd Albert; Dom Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-11-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.