Literature DB >> 26905537

Global Vision Impairment and Blindness Due to Uncorrected Refractive Error, 1990-2010.

Kovin S Naidoo1, Janet Leasher, Rupert R Bourne, Seth R Flaxman, Jost B Jonas, Jill Keeffe, Hans Limburg, Konrad Pesudovs, Holly Price, Richard A White, Tien Y Wong, Hugh R Taylor, Serge Resnikoff.   

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to estimate worldwide the number of people with moderate and severe visual impairment (MSVI; presenting visual acuity <6/18, ≥3/60) or blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60) due to uncorrected refractive error (URE), to estimate trends in prevalence from 1990 to 2010, and to analyze regional differences. The review focuses on uncorrected refractive error which is now the most common cause of avoidable visual impairment globally. : The systematic review of 14,908 relevant manuscripts from 1990 to 2010 using Medline, Embase, and WHOLIS yielded 243 high-quality, population-based cross-sectional studies which informed a meta-analysis of trends by region. The results showed that in 2010, 6.8 million (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7-8.8 million) people were blind (7.9% increase from 1990) and 101.2 million (95% CI: 87.88-125.5 million) vision impaired due to URE (15% increase since 1990), while the global population increased by 30% (1990-2010). The all-age age-standardized prevalence of URE blindness decreased 33% from 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1-0.2%) in 1990 to 0.1% (95% CI: 0.1-0.1%) in 2010, whereas the prevalence of URE MSVI decreased 25% from 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6-2.4%) in 1990 to 1.5% (95% CI: 1.3-1.9%) in 2010. In 2010, URE contributed 20.9% (95% CI: 15.2-25.9%) of all blindness and 52.9% (95% CI: 47.2-57.3%) of all MSVI worldwide. The contribution of URE to all MSVI ranged from 44.2 to 48.1% in all regions except in South Asia which was at 65.4% (95% CI: 62-72%). : We conclude that in 2010, uncorrected refractive error continues as the leading cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide, affecting a total of 108 million people or 1 in 90 persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905537     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  63 in total

1.  The effects of implantable collamer lens implantation on higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Belma Kayhan; Efekan Coskunseven; Onurcan Sahin; Ioannis Pallikaris
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive errors in an urban area of Mexico.

Authors:  Isabel Signes-Soler; David P Piñero; Milagro Inés Murillo; Silvia Tablada
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Prevalence of and risk factors for refractive error: a cross-sectional study in Han and Mongolian adults aged 40-80 years in Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  M Wang; J Ma; L Pan; T Chen; H L Wang; Y H Wang; W R Wang; X D Pan; Y G Qian; X Zhang; Y Zhong; G L Shan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Ocular Determinants of Refractive Error and Its Age- and Sex-Related Variations in the Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Grace M Richter; Mingwu Wang; Xuejuan Jiang; Shuang Wu; Dandan Wang; Mina Torres; Farzana Choudhury; Rohit Varma
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Prevalence and Associated Factors of Uncorrected Refractive Error in Older Adults in a Population-Based Study in France.

Authors:  Virginie Naël; Gwendoline Moreau; Solène Monfermé; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Angelo Arleo; Jean-François Korobelnik; Cécile Delcourt; Catherine Helmer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics.

Authors:  Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Judith E Goldstein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Refractive errors among children, adolescents and adults attending eye clinics in Mexico.

Authors:  Francisco Gomez-Salazar; Abraham Campos-Romero; Humberto Gomez-Campaña; Cinthia Cruz-Zamudio; Mariano Chaidez-Felix; Nidia Leon-Sicairos; Jorge Velazquez-Roman; Hector Flores-Villaseñor; Secundino Muro-Amador; Alma Marlene Guadron-Llanos; Javier J Martinez-Garcia; Joel Murillo-Llanes; Jaime Sanchez-Cuen; Alejando Llausas-Vargas; Gerardo Alapizco-Castro; Ana Irineo-Cabrales; Enrique Graue-Hernandez; Tito Ramirez-Luquin; Adrian Canizalez-Roman
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.

Authors:  V Swetha E Jeganathan; Nita Valikodath; Leslie M Niziol; Sean Hansen; Hannah Apostolou; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Refractive error in underserved adults: causes and potential solutions.

Authors:  V Swetha E Jeganathan; Alan L Robin; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Types and Presentation of Refractive Error among Individuals Aged 0-30 Years: Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study, Yemen.

Authors:  Tawfik Saleh Mohammed Dhaiban; Femina Purakaloth Ummer; Hanan Khudadad; Shajitha Thekke Veettil
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.