Michele L Ybarra1, Margaret Rosario2, Elizabeth Saewyc3, Carol Goodenow4. 1. Center for Innovative Public Health Research, San Clemente, California. Electronic address: Michele@InnovativePublicHealth.org. 2. Department of Psychology, The City University of New York-City College and Graduate Center, New York, New York. 3. School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Independent Consultant, Northborough, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Data suggest that lesbian and bisexual adolescents engage in risky sexual behaviors at higher rates than heterosexual girls. Whether these findings also apply to girls of other sexual identities is less well understood. Potential differences in risky sexual behaviors reported by lesbian versus bisexual adolescents are also underreported in the literature. METHODS: Data were collected online in 2010-2011 among 2,823 girls, aged 13-18 years, in the United States. Multinomial logistic regression was used to quantify comparisons of sexual behaviors between (1) lesbian; (2) bisexual; and (3) questioning, unsure, or other (QUO) identity; and (0) heterosexual girls. Logistic regression compared lesbian and bisexual adolescents. RESULTS: Lesbian and bisexual adolescents reported significantly more lifetime and past-year sexual partners than heterosexual girls. Bisexual girls were also more likely to report penile-anal and penile-vaginal sex, whereas lesbians were more likely to report earlier sexual debut for almost all types of sex, as compared to heterosexual girls. Lesbians also were more likely to report infrequent condom use and less likely to have conversations with partners about the use of barriers (e.g., dental dams) before first sex. Relative to lesbians, bisexual girls reported older age at first sex for almost all sexual behaviors and higher lifetime prevalence of recent male partners, penile-vaginal, and penile-anal sex. Few differences were noted between QUO and heterosexual girls. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority adolescents are not identical in terms of sexual risk. Providers need to be sensitive to these differences and their implications for health and counseling of patients.
PURPOSE: Data suggest that lesbian and bisexual adolescents engage in risky sexual behaviors at higher rates than heterosexual girls. Whether these findings also apply to girls of other sexual identities is less well understood. Potential differences in risky sexual behaviors reported by lesbian versus bisexual adolescents are also underreported in the literature. METHODS: Data were collected online in 2010-2011 among 2,823 girls, aged 13-18 years, in the United States. Multinomial logistic regression was used to quantify comparisons of sexual behaviors between (1) lesbian; (2) bisexual; and (3) questioning, unsure, or other (QUO) identity; and (0) heterosexual girls. Logistic regression compared lesbian and bisexual adolescents. RESULTS: Lesbian and bisexual adolescents reported significantly more lifetime and past-year sexual partners than heterosexual girls. Bisexual girls were also more likely to report penile-anal and penile-vaginal sex, whereas lesbians were more likely to report earlier sexual debut for almost all types of sex, as compared to heterosexual girls. Lesbians also were more likely to report infrequent condom use and less likely to have conversations with partners about the use of barriers (e.g., dental dams) before first sex. Relative to lesbians, bisexual girls reported older age at first sex for almost all sexual behaviors and higher lifetime prevalence of recent male partners, penile-vaginal, and penile-anal sex. Few differences were noted between QUO and heterosexual girls. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority adolescents are not identical in terms of sexual risk. Providers need to be sensitive to these differences and their implications for health and counseling of patients.
Authors: Margaret Rosario; Heather L Corliss; Bethany G Everett; Sari L Reisner; S Bryn Austin; Francisco O Buchting; Michelle Birkett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mark S Friedman; Michael P Marshal; Thomas E Guadamuz; Chongyi Wei; Carolyn F Wong; Elizabeth Saewyc; Ron Stall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alyssa L Norris; Larry K Brown; Ralph J DiClemente; Robert F Valois; Daniel Romer; Peter A Vanable; Michael P Carey Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2018-12-02 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Bethany G Everett; Blair Turner; Tonda L Hughes; Cindy B Veldhuis; Margaret Paschen-Wolff; Gregory Phillips Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Kasey B Jackman; Lilian Ferrer; Kenrick D Cato; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Allison M Baker; Jaquelyn L Jahn; Andy S L Tan; Sabra L Katz-Wise; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Rachel A Bishop; Madina Agénor Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2020-09-11
Authors: Emma Carpenter; Bethany G Everett; Madelyne Z Greene; Sadia Haider; C Emily Hendrick; Jenny A Higgins Journal: Soc Work Health Care Date: 2020-03