Michael J Hughes1, Jingli Chong2, Ewen Harrison2, Stephen Wigmore2. 1. Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. Electronic address: michaelh@doctors.net.uk. 2. Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols have been implemented effectively after liver resection and provide benefits in terms of general morbidity rates. In order to optimise peri-operative care protocols and minimise morbidity, further investigation is required to identify factors associated with poor outcome after liver resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver resection and enhanced recovery care between January 2006 and September 2012 was conducted. Data were collected on patient outcome and demographics, operative and pathological details. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of adverse outcome. RESULTS: 603 patients underwent liver resection during the study period. Morbidity and mortality rates were 34.3% and 1.5% respectively. The only predictor of major morbidity was extended resection (OR 4.079; 95% CI 2.177-7.642). CONCLUSIONS: Extended resection is associated with major morbidity. When determining optimum peri-operative care, ERAS protocols must incorporate care components that can mitigate against morbidity associated with extended resection.
INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols have been implemented effectively after liver resection and provide benefits in terms of general morbidity rates. In order to optimise peri-operative care protocols and minimise morbidity, further investigation is required to identify factors associated with poor outcome after liver resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver resection and enhanced recovery care between January 2006 and September 2012 was conducted. Data were collected on patient outcome and demographics, operative and pathological details. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of adverse outcome. RESULTS: 603 patients underwent liver resection during the study period. Morbidity and mortality rates were 34.3% and 1.5% respectively. The only predictor of major morbidity was extended resection (OR 4.079; 95% CI 2.177-7.642). CONCLUSIONS: Extended resection is associated with major morbidity. When determining optimum peri-operative care, ERAS protocols must incorporate care components that can mitigate against morbidity associated with extended resection.
Authors: Matteo Cescon; Gaetano Vetrone; Gian Luca Grazi; Giovanni Ramacciato; Giorgio Ercolani; Matteo Ravaioli; Massimo Del Gaudio; Antonio Daniele Pinna Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C Jones; L Kelliher; M Dickinson; A Riga; T Worthington; M J Scott; T Vandrevala; C H Fry; N Karanjia; N Quiney Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Vincent W T Lam; Jerome M Laurence; Emma Johnston; Michael J Hollands; Henry C C Pleass; Arthur J Richardson Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Giuseppe Zimmitti; Robert E Roses; Andreas Andreou; Junichi Shindoh; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michael J Hughes; Rosie J Hackney; Peter J Lamb; Stephen J Wigmore; D A Christopher Deans; Richard J E Skipworth Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kim M C van Mierlo; Toine M Lodewick; Dipok K Dhar; Victor van Woerden; Ralph Kurstjens; Frank G Schaap; Ronald M van Dam; Soumil Vyas; Massimo Malagó; Cornelis H C Dejong; Steven W M Olde Damink Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 3.647