Literature DB >> 26902089

The water penetration of different ventilation tubes.

Rupert G Ricks1, Rachel Easto2, Venkat M Reddy2.   

Abstract

The insertion of middle ear ventilation tubes remains one of the most common procedures for ENT surgeons. A common concern amongst patients undergoing such procedures is the effect on their ability to partake in swimming and other water sports. Currently there is little evidence comparing the penetration ability of different water solutions encountered by swimmers. This study compares the water penetration of four different water solutions for Shah, mini-Shah, T tube and titanium bobbin ventilation tubes. A model was constructed to replicate a grommet inserted through a tympanic membrane using a syringe barrel, latex membrane and one of the ventilation tubes. Four solutions (sea water, chlorinated water, freshwater and soapy water) were then pipetted down the barrel until penetration of the tube occurred. The volume required for penetration was recorded. For all tubes soapy water was the most penetrating, followed by seawater. Titanium bobbins required significantly less of each solution for penetration. Mini-Shah grommets required significantly more of all solutions except soapy water for penetration to occur. Shah grommets were more resistant to chlorinated and sea water than T tubes. Mini-Shah grommets appear to protect against water penetration into the middle ear cleft and their use should be considered in patients who are keen water-sport enthusiasts. Furthermore, swimmers in sea or chlorinated water seem to be at higher risk than freshwater swimmers. Titanium bobbins were relatively easily penetrated by all four solutions and should be avoided in keen swimmers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Middle ear ventilation; Swimming; Tympanostomy tube insertion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26902089     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-3932-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

Review 1.  Are water precautions necessary after tympanostomy tube placement?

Authors:  Gabriel J Tsao; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Tympanostomy tubes and liquids--an in vitro study.

Authors:  N R Pashley; P D Scholl
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-10

3.  Swimming and grommets.

Authors:  N J Marks; R P Mills
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Ventilation tubes after surgery for otitis media with effusion or acute otitis media and swimming. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael Carbonell; Vicente Ruíz-García
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 5.  Water precautions for prevention of infection in children with ventilation tubes (grommets).

Authors:  Daniel Moualed; Liam Masterson; Sanjiv Kumar; Neil Donnelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-27
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Water penetration of grommets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Yousef Ibrahim; Paul Fram; Gavin Hughes; Pete Phillips; David Owens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Tri-dimensional model for ventilation tube permeability.

Authors:  Omer J Ungar; Solomon Dadia; Oron Yahav; Ophir Handzel; Dan M Fliss; Oren Cavel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.