| Literature DB >> 26902086 |
Chan-Sik Kim1, Junghyun Kim1, Yun Mi Lee1, Eunjin Sohn1, Jin Sook Kim1.
Abstract
Naturally occurring coumarin compounds have received substantial attention due to their pharmaceutical effects. Esculetin is a coumarin derivative and a polyphenol compound that is used in a variety of therapeutic and pharmacological strategies. However, its effect on aldose reductase activity remains poorly understood. In this study, the potential beneficialeffects of esculetin on lenticular aldose reductase were investigated in galactose-fed (GAL) rats, an animal model of sugar cataracts. Cataracts were induced in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats via a 50% galactose diet for 2 weeks, and groups of GAL rats were orally treated with esculetin (10 or 50 mg/kg body weight). In vehicle-treated GAL rats, lens opacificationwas observed, and swelling and membrane rupture of the lens fibercells were increased. Additionally, aldose reductase was highly expressed in the lens epithelium and superficialcortical fibersduring cataract development in the GAL rats. Esculetin reduced rat lens aldose reductase (RLAR) activity in vitro, and esculetin treatment significanty inhibited lens opacity, as well as morphological alterations, such as swelling, vacuolation and liquefaction of lens fibers,via the inhibition of aldose reductase in the GAL rats. These results indicate that esculetin is a useful treatment for galactose-induced cataracts.Entities:
Keywords: Aldose reductase; Esculetin; Galactose; Lens fiber; Sugar cataract
Year: 2016 PMID: 26902086 PMCID: PMC4774499 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2015.101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Inhibitory effect of esculetin on RLAR activity in vitro
| Sample | Concentration (μM) | Inhibition (%) | IC50 (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esculetin | 5.6 | 13.89 ± 5.01 | 18.11 ± 0.95 |
| 14.0 | 38.89 ± 6.36 | ||
| 28.1 | 78.70 ± 6.26 | ||
| TMG | 20 | 31.42 ± 5.71 | 28.81 ± 1.52 |
| 30 | 56.42 ± 9.60 | ||
| 40 | 69.69 ± 8.15 |
Inhibitory activity is expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate samples. IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism ® software and plotted.
TMG (3.3-Tetramethyleneglutaric acid) was used as a positive control.
Fig. 2.Opacification of the lens. (A) Representative images of the lenses in each group. (B) Analysis of lens opacities. All opacities were analyzed in each lens of the normal rats (NOR) and vehicle-treated galactose-fed (GAL) rats. The GAL rats were treated with esculetin at doses of 10 mg/kg (Esculetin-10) and 50 mg/kg (Esculetin-50). All data are expressed as the mean ± SE, n=6. *p<0.01 vs. normal rats, #p<0.01 vs. GAL rats.
Fig. 3.Wet weights of the lenses. Normal rats (NOR), vehicle-treated galactose-fed (GAL) rats, and GAL rats treated with esculetin at doses of 10 mg/kg (Esculetin-10) and 50 mg/kg (Esculetin-50) were examined. All data are expressed as the mean ± SE, n=8. *p<0.01 vs. normal rats, #p<0.01 vs. GAL rats.
Fig. 4.Degeneration of the lens fiber. (A) Rhodamine-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin staining. Lens sections from a normal rat (NOR) and vehicle-treated galactose-fed (GAL) rat. The GAL rat samples were treated with esculetin at doses of 10 mg/kg (Esculetin-10) and 50 mg/kg (Esculetin-50). Fiber cell liquefaction (arrow), swelling (asterisk) and membrane rupture (arrowhead) were observed in the galactosemic cataractous lenses. The Scale bar indicates 20 μm. (B) Lens fiber degeneration grading. Lens fiber degeneration was assessed on a scale of a scale of 0–IV.
Fig. 5.Expression of aldose reductase protein. (A) Immunohistochemical staining of aldose reductase. Representative immunostaining of aldose reductase in lenses from a normal rat (NOR) and vehicle-treated galactose-fed (GAL) rat. The GAL rats were treated with esculetin at doses of 10 mg/kg (Esculetin-10) and 50 mg/kg (Esculetin-50). Strong immunoreactivity of aldose reductase was observed in the cytoplasm of lens epithelial cells and lens cortical fibers. The Scale bar indicates 20 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of aldose reductase signal intensity. All data are expressed as the mean ± SE, n=6. ***p<0.001 vs. normal rats. ###p<0.001, ##p<0.05 vs. GAL rats.