| Literature DB >> 28822992 |
Ji Seong Jeong1, Ki Taek Nam2, Buhyun Lee2, Aryo Dimas Pamungkas3, Daeun Song4, Minjeong Kim4, Wook-Joon Yu1, Jinsoo Lee1, Sunha Jee5, Youngja H Park3, Kyung-Min Lim4.
Abstract
Increasing concern is being given to the association between risk of cancer and exposure to low-dose bisphenol A (BPA), especially in young-aged population. In this study, we investigated the effects of repeated oral treatment of low to high dose BPA in juvenile Sprague-Dawley rats. Exposing juvenile rats to BPA (0, 0.5, 5, 50, and 250 mg/kg oral gavage) from post-natal day 9 for 90 days resulted in higher food intakes and increased body weights in biphasic dose-effect relationship. Male mammary glands were atrophied at high dose, which coincided with sexual pre-maturation of females. Notably, proliferative changes with altered cell foci and focal inflammation were observed around bile ducts in the liver of all BPA-dosed groups in males, which achieved statistical significance from 0.5 mg/kg (ANOVA, Dunnett's test, p<0.05). Toxicokinetic analysis revealed that systemic exposure to BPA was greater at early age (e.g., 210-fold in Cmax, and 26-fold in AUC at 50 mg/kg in male on day 1 over day 90) and in females (e.g., 4-fold in Cmax and 1.6-fold in AUC at 50 mg/kg vs. male on day 1), which might have stemmed from either age- or gender-dependent differences in metabolic capacity. These results may serve as evidence for the association between risk of cancer and exposure to low-dose BPA, especially in young children, as well as for varying toxicity of xenobiotics in different age and gender groups.Entities:
Keywords: Bile duct proliferation; Bisphenol A; Juvenile animals; Toxicokinetics
Year: 2017 PMID: 28822992 PMCID: PMC5590799 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Body weight and food consumption of juvenile rats exposed to BPA for 90 days. Body weight of male (A) and female (B) rats orally exposed to BPA at 0, 0.5, 5, 50 and 250 mg/kg/day. Food consumptions of male (C) and female (D) rats. Data are mean ± SD of 10 animals. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, Student t-test for the difference from 0 mg/kg/day.
Histopathological findings and grading of the liver of males
| Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 0.5 | 5 | 50 | 250 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of animals observed | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Altered cell foci | + (0/5) | + (1/5) | + (0/5) | + (1/5) | + (2/5) |
| ++ (0/5) | ++ (1/5) | ++ (2/5) | ++ (2/5) | ++ (1/5) | |
| +++ (0/5) | +++ (0/5) | +++ (0/5) | +++ (1/5) | +++ (2/5) | |
| Bile duct hyperplasia | + (0/5) | + (3/5) | + (1/5) | + (1/5) | + (0/5) |
| ++ (0/5) | ++ (1/5) | ++ (2/5) | ++ (2/5) | ++ (2/5) | |
| +++ (0/5) | +++ (1/5) | +++ (2/5) | +++ (2/5) | +++ (3/5) | |
| Focal inflammation | + (0/5) | + (2/5) | + (2/5) | + (4/5) | + (2/5) |
| ++ (0/5) | ++ (0/5) | ++ (3/5) | ++ (0/5) | ++ (2/5) | |
| +++ (0/5) | +++ (0/5) | +++ (0/5) | +++ (1/5) | +++ (1/5) |
( ): Number of animals, Affected animals/Total examined animals.
Fig. 2.Histopatholgical findings in the liver of BPA-treated juvenile rats. BPA 0.5 mg/kg: Photomicrograph of the eosinophilic altered cell foci (arrow head) with grade + (A), BPA 0.5 mg/kg: Photomicrograph of minimal bile duct hyperplasia (arrow head) with lymphocytic cell infiltration (asterisk) with grade ++ (B). BPA 0.5 mg/kg: Focal inflammatory cell infiltration with grade + (C). BPA 5 mg/kg: Photomicrograph of the eosinophilic altered cell foci (arrow head) with grade ++ (D). (Bar=50 μm).
Fig. 3.Bile duct proliferation in the liver of BPA-treated juvenile rats. Photomicrograph of the immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 to evaluate bile duct proliferation, BPA 0 mg/kg (A), 0.5 mg/kg with arrow heads indicating Ki-67+ cells (B) and 250 mg/kg (C). Ratio of Ki-67+ bile duct cells over total bile duct cells (mean ± SEM of counting in 7–45 sections). **p<0.01 One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc analysis.
Toxicokinetic parameters
| Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0.5 | 5 | 50 | 250 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Day 1 | Day 91 | Day 1 | Day 91 | Day 1 | Day 91 | Day 1 | Day 91 | |
| Male | ||||||||
| Tmax (Tmax1/Tmax2, h) | 0.5 | - | 0.25 | - | 1 | 1/8 | 1/8 | 1 |
| Cmax (Cmax1/Cmax2, nM) | 14.7 | - | 86.6 | - | 8387.8 | 33.3/40.0 | 146,219.7/14,286.8 | 883.2 |
| Area under curve (AUC0-t, nmole | 17.1 | - | 105.8 | - | 12,834.2 | 493.8 | 269,943.3 | 2,369.4 |
| Female | ||||||||
| Tmax (h) | 0.25 | - | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 1/8 | 0.5 |
| Cmax (nmole/L, nM) | 7.5 | - | 130.0 | 10.9 | 34,635.6 | 108.0 | 121,141.4/56,091.0 | 2445.9 |
| Area under curve (AUC0-t, nmole | 1.9 | - | 89.3 | 4.4 | 19,961.1 | 123.0 | 773,664.0 | 3,088.5 |
Parameters were calculated with average concentrations of each time point.