Literature DB >> 26900297

Using typical endoscopic features to diagnose esophageal squamous papilloma.

Ming-Wun Wong1, Ming-Joug Bair1, Shou-Chuan Shih1, Cheng-Hsin Chu1, Horng-Yuan Wang1, Tsang-En Wang1, Chen-Wang Chang1, Ming-Jen Chen1.   

Abstract

AIM: To better understand some of the superficial tiny lesions that are recognized as squamous papilloma of the esophagus (SPE) and receive a different pathological diagnosis.
METHODS: All consecutive patients with esophageal polypoid lesions detected by routine endoscopy at our Endoscopy Centre between October 2009 and June 2014 were retrospectively analysed. We enrolled patients with SPE or other superficial lesions to investigate four key endoscopic appearances (whitish color, exophytic growth, wart-like shape, and surface vessels) and used narrow band imaging (NBI) to distinguish their differences. These series endoscopic images of each patient were retrospectively reviewed by three experienced endoscopists with no prior access to the images. All lesion specimens obtained by forceps biopsy were fixed in formalin and processed for pathological examination. The following data were collected from patient medical records: gender, age, indications for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic characteristics including lesion location, number, color, size, surface morphology, surrounding mucosa, and surface vessels under NBI. Clinicopathological features were also compared.
RESULTS: During the study period, 41 esophageal polypoid lesions from 5698 endoscopic examinations were identified retrospectively. These included 24 patients with pathologically confirmed SPE, 11 patients with squamous hyperplasia, three patients with glycogenic acanthosis, two patients with ectopic sebaceous glands, and one patient with a xanthoma. In the χ (2) test, exophytic growth (P = 0.003), a wart-like shape (P < 0.001), and crossing surface vessels under NBI (P = 0.001) were more frequently observed in SPE than in other lesion types. By contrast, there was no significant difference regarding the appearance of a whitish color between SPE and other lesion types (P = 0.872). The most sensitive characteristic was wart-like projections (81.3%) and the most specific was exophytic growth (87.5%). Promising positive predictive values of 84.2%, 80.8%, and 82.6% were noted for exophytic growth, wart-like projections, and surface vessel crossing on NBI, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The use of three key typical endoscopic appearances--exophytic growth, a wart-like shape, and vessel crossing on the lesion surface under NBI--has a promising positive predictive value of 88.2%. This diagnostic triad is useful for the endoscopic diagnosis of SPE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Endoscopy; Esophagus; Narrow band imaging; Squamous papilloma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26900297      PMCID: PMC4735009          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

1.  Esophageal papillomatosis complicated by squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  F Donnellan; B Walker; R Enns
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 2.  Benign esophageal lesions: endoscopic and pathologic features.

Authors:  Shu-Jung Tsai; Ching-Chung Lin; Chen-Wang Chang; Chien-Yuan Hung; Tze-Yu Shieh; Horng-Yuan Wang; Shou-Chuan Shih; Ming-Jen Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Squamous papilloma of the esophagus: long-term follow up.

Authors:  S Mosca; G Manes; R Monaco; P F Bellomo; V Bottino; A Balzano
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Squamous cell papilloma of the esophagus. Report on 35 endoscopic cases.

Authors:  R Sablich; G Benedetti; S Bignucolo; D Serraino
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Esophageal papillomatosis complicated by squamous cell carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  J Reynoso; R E Davis; W W Daniels; Z T Awad; Z Gatalica; C J Filipi
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.429

6.  Squamous papillomas of the esophagus.

Authors:  G Franzin; R Musola; G Zamboni; A Nicolis; C Manfrini; A Fratton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Esophageal squamous cell papillomas. Failure to detect human papillomavirus DNA by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  F Chang; E Janatuinen; P Pikkarainen; S Syrjänen; K Syrjänen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Squamous cell papilloma of the esophagus. Report of a case after peptic esophagitis and repeated bougienage with review of the literature.

Authors:  S A Parnell; M A Peppercorn; D A Antonioli; M A Cohen; N Joffe
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Prevalence of esophageal squamous papilloma (ESP) and associated cancer in northeastern France.

Authors:  Marie-Caroline d'Huart; Jean Baptiste Chevaux; Aude Marchal Bressenot; Nicolas Froment; Lucine Vuitton; Séverine Valmary Degano; Clotide Latarche; Marc André Bigard; Alain Courrier; Hervé Hudziak; Stéphane Koch; Eric Kull; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-01-16

10.  Clinicopathological characteristics of esophageal squamous papillomas in Japanese patients--with comparison of findings from Western countries.

Authors:  Kuniko Takeshita; Shin-Ichi Murata; Shoji Mitsufuji; Naoki Wakabayashi; Keisho Kataoka; Yasunari Tsuchihashi; Takeshi Okanoue
Journal:  Acta Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

View more
  2 in total

1.  Esophageal Squamous Cell Papilloma: A Report of Three Cases.

Authors:  Muhammer Ergenç; Taygun Gülşen; Fadime Bahadır
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 2.  HPV-Associated Benign Squamous Cell Papillomas in the Upper Aero-Digestive Tract and Their Malignant Potential.

Authors:  Stina Syrjänen; Kari Syrjänen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.