| Literature DB >> 26900174 |
Kalle Olli1, Riina Klais1, Timo Tamminen2.
Abstract
Blooms ofEntities:
Keywords: Aphanizomenon; Baltic Sea; Nodularia; aquatic plant ecology; community assembly; functional diversity; nitrogen fixation; nutrient limitation; phylogenetic diversity
Year: 2015 PMID: 26900174 PMCID: PMC4744973 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ecol ISSN: 0022-0477 Impact factor: 6.256
Figure 1Spatial distribution of phytoplankton summer samples in the data set (upper panel). The grey scale of the symbols reflects the proportion of the diazotrophic biomass in the sample. The symbols are plotted in the order of increasing diazotrophic proportion and in overlapping symbols, high‐proportion samples overlay low‐proportion samples. Frequency distribution of the proportions of total diazotrophs, Aphanizomenon sp and Nodularia spumigena biomass in the samples (lower panel). Note the strongly skewed distributions.
The mean (±SD), median and maximum proportion of total diazotrophic biomass, and the proportions of the two main species, Nodularia spumigena and Aphanizomenon sp. in the 3761 Baltic Sea summer samples
| Total diazotrophs |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 0.17 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.15 |
| Median | 0.10 | 0 | 0.07 |
| Max | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
The linear relationship between resource use efficiency (RUEP and RUEN) and diazotrophic proportion
| Total diazotrophs |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUEP; | 0.31 ± 0.08; | 0.87 ± 0.13; | 0.24 ± 0.09; |
| RUEN; | 0.15 ± 0.08; | 0.36 ± 0.14; | 0.10 ± 0.09; |
The parameter estimates are slopes of the linear regression components of the GAM models (±SE). The GAM model also accounted for the spatial dependence of RUE through a two‐dimensional smooth term of latitude and longitude. RUE was rescaled to standard scores to facilitate comparison between regression slopes.
Figure 2NMDS ordination plots of the non‐diazotrophic phytoplankton community (1994–2004) from the three main sub‐basins of the Baltic Sea. The symbol size reflects the proportion of total diazotrophs in the sample. The iso‐lines show the 2D response surface of the total diazotroph proportion. The arrows, superimposed on the ordination, show the direction and strength of diazotroph proportion (equivalent to the length of the arrow, numerical values and significance levels in Table 3).
The strength of associations between diazotroph proportion and the variation of the ambient phytoplankton community in the main Baltic Sea sub‐basins
| Sub‐basin | Analysis | Total diazotrophs |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOR |
| 0.08 ( | 0.05 ( | 0.05 ( |
|
| 0.01 ( | 0.01 ( | 0.01 ( | |
|
| 0.03 ( | 0.01 ( | 0.03 ( | |
| BP |
| 0.06 ( | 0.07 ( | 0.07 ( |
|
| 0.005 ( | 0.003 ( | 0.004 ( | |
|
| 0.01 ( | 0.005 ( | 0.02 ( | |
| GOF |
| 0.17 ( | 0.05 ( | 0.13 ( |
|
| 0.008 ( | 0.007 ( | 0.006 ( | |
|
| 0.02 ( | 0.007 ( | 0.02 ( |
GOR, Gulf of Riga; BP, Baltic Proper; GOF, Gulf of Finland; n, number of samples in each analysis.
Only samples from 1994 to 2004 are used. All significance levels (in parenthesis) were assessed by randomizing diazotroph proportions between the samples (999 simulations).
Squared correlation coefficient (R 2) between NMDS ordination and the diazotroph proportion as an external variable.
Constrained inertia in CCA ordination, that is the part of community variation, which can be explained by the diazotroph proportion.
Community variation due to diazotrophs partitioned with permutational multivariate analysis of variance.
Significant associations and positive associations with diazotroph proportion and biomass (separated with ‘/’), as detected by local similarity analysis (LSA)
| Significant associations | Positive associations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Proportion | Count | Proportion |
| |
| GOF | |||||
| Total diazotrophs | 58/59 | 0.68/0.60 | 19/42 | 0.33/0.71 | 0.01/0.002 |
|
| 56/57 | 0.66/0.58 | 19/40 | 0.34/0.70 | 0.02/0.004 |
|
| 36/46 | 0.41/0.46 | 15/25 | 0.43/0.54 | 0.5/0.66 |
| GOR | |||||
| Total diazotrophs | 61/68 | 0.70/0.72 | 37/46 | 0.61/0.68 | 0.1/0.005 |
|
| 67/68 | 0.77/0.72 | 42/46 | 0.63/0.68 | 0.05/0.005 |
|
| 53/61 | 0.61/0.64 | 33/40 | 0.62/0.66 | 0.1/0.02 |
| BP | |||||
| Total diazotrophs | 88/103 | 0.55/0.6 | 57/90 | 0.65/0.87 | < 0.01/< 0.001 |
|
| 98/108 | 0.61/0.62 | 55/91 | 0.56/0.84 | 0.3/< 0.001 |
|
| 96/111 | 0.69/0.64 | 68/86 | 0.71/0.77 | < 0.01/< 0.001 |
Sub‐basin codes as in Table 3.
Total number of species analysed in each sub‐basin.
The number of significant associations. Associations were conservatively considered significant when all 1000 re‐analysis with randomized sample order resulted in either positive or negative LS scores.
The proportion significant associations.
The number of positive associations.
The proportion of positive associations out of significant associations.
P‐value of the 1‐sample proportion test on equality of positive and negative associations.
Figure 3Standard deviations of the LS scores, as a function of the mean LS score. Results with total diazotrophs, Nodularia spumigena and Aphanizomenon sp., and all sub‐basins are pooled. Black symbols denote mean LS scores where all 1000 randomizations resulted in either negative or positive values, and are considered statistically significant in Table 4. Grey symbols denote LS scores with mixed signs. Note the high variability as the mean LS score approaches zero, designating species with neutral association with diazotrophs.
Figure 4Relationship between the LS scores of Aphanizomenon sp. and Nodularia spumigena. The data points represent species. Species with strongest positive or negative co‐occurrence patterns (large symbols, labelled) are on the upper‐right and lower‐left parts of the data cloud. Chrysp – Chrysochromulina sp; Pseuthom – Pseudopedinella thomsenii; Dinophyc – Dinophyceae; Gymnsp – Gymnodinium sp; Dolisp – Dolichospermum sp; Protbrev – Protoperidinium brevipes; Pseusp – Pseudopedinella sp; Snowlacu – Snowella lacustris; Telesp – Teleaulax sp; Chrysphy – Chrysophyceae; Hemivire – Hemiselmis virescens; Oocylacu – Oocystis lacustris.
Functional and phylogenetic similarity of taxa revealing positive (SES < 0) or negative (SES > 0) association with diazotroph cyanobacterial proportion and biomass (separated with ‘/’)
| Phylogenetic distance | Functional distance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES |
| SES |
| |
| GOF | ||||
| Total | −0.3/0.9 | 0.4/0.16 | 0.80/−2.1 | 0.2/0.02 |
|
| 1/1.4 | 0.2/0.08 | −0.76/−2.1 | 0.2/0.02 |
|
| 0.2/1.1 | 0.4/0.14 | −1.4/−1.1 | 0.09/0.14 |
| GOR | ||||
| Total | −0.5/0.56 | 0.3/0.3 | 1.2/−0.25 | 0.1/0.4 |
|
| 0.3/0.49 | 0.4/0.3 | 0.14/−0.14 | 0.4/0.5 |
|
| −1.7/−0.2 | 0.04/0.4 | 2.5/1 | 0.003/0.16 |
| BP | ||||
| Total | −0.3/4.3 | 0.4/0 | −0.07/2.4 | 0.5/0.008 |
|
| 1.7/4.3 | 0.04/0 | 1.3/2.85 | 0.1/0.002 |
|
| −0.2/2.8 | 0.4/0.002 | 1.3/1.57 | 0.1/0.056 |
Sub‐basin codes as in Table 3.
Total number of species analyzed in each sub‐basin. The statistical significance of the phylogenetic or functional effect size (expressed as P‐value) indicates the proportion of times when the observed MPD was lower (SES < 0) or higher (SES > 0) than the randomized MPD (9999 simulations).