| Literature DB >> 36212010 |
Yifan Su1,2, Lin Gan1,2, Yun Li1,2, Ziwu Fan1,2, Chen Xie1,2, Yang Liu1,2, Yipeng Liao1,2, Rui Ding1,2, Guoqin Liu1,2, Jingxiu Wu1,2, Guangyu Chen1,2, Jianhao Sun1,2, Wenhan Zhu1,2, Jingtian Ma1,2.
Abstract
Increasing eutrophication and climate change have led to heavy cyanobacterial blooms in water diversion sources (e.g., lakes, reservoirs), which can potentially cause algae-bearing water to spread to downstream to an urban river network via diversion channels. Defining the extent of cyanobacterial blooms in an urban river network has become a novel concern in urban river management. In this paper, we investigated the physicochemical and algae community characteristics of a small, closed, urban river network, JiangXinZhou (JXZ), in the Lake Taihu basin. We propose a novel indicator, resource use efficiency (RUE), for defining the extent of cyanobacterial blooms in JXZ, whose recreational drinking water comes entirely from outside diversion sources. The results show that the JXZ's aquatic habitat conditions (mean water temperature, total nitrogen concentration, total phosphorus concentration, and nitrogen to phosphorus ratio) are highly suitable for the proliferation of cyanobacterial biomass during the high-water period. The RUE was used for calculation and shows a strong relationship with algae density, which means that it can be used as an index to define the degree of urban river cyanobacterial blooms. The findings indicate that the risk of cyanobacterial bloom is absent when the RUE is less than 46.81; blooms appear in the water bodies when the RUE reaches up to 106.68. This work provides theoretical support for the sustainable use of regional water resources.Entities:
Keywords: Algal resource availability; Cyanobacterial prevention and control; Eutrophication; Lake Taihu basin river network; Urbanization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212010 PMCID: PMC9535294 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Location of JXZ and sampling sites. (A) yellow region means built-up area, green region means unbuilt area. (B) picture of built-up area’ river channel. (C) picture of unbuilt area’ river channel.
Figure 2Changes in chemical variables at the JXZ. (A) Total nitrogen concentration in JXZ between high-water period and low-water period. (B) Total phosphorus concentration in JXZ between high-water period and low-water period. (C) Nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in JXZ between high-water period and low-water period. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3Changes in physical variables at the JXZ. (A) Water temperature in JXZ between high-water period and low-water period. (B) water velocity in JXZ.
Figure 4Changes in Phytoplankton communities at the JXZ. (A) Phytoplankton abundance. (B) Phytoplankton composition in low-water period. (C) Phytoplankton composition in high-water period. Xan., Xanthophyta; Chl., Chlorophyta; Eug., Euglenophyta; Pyr., Pyrrophyta; Cry., Cryptophyta; Bac., Bacillariophyta. Cya., Cyanobacteria. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 5Changes in RUE at the JXZ. (A) RUE values in JXZ at high-water period. (B) RUE values in JXZ at low-water period.
Figure 6Relationships between environmental variables and phytoplankton community structure. DEN., Algae density; Tem., Water temperature; Vel., Flow velocity; TN., Total nitrogen; TP., Total phosphorus; N/P, Nitrogen to phosphorus ratios.
Figure 7Relationships between RUE and algae density.
Classification standard of cyanobacterial bloom degree based on algal density and RUE.
| Degree of cyanobacterial bloom | Algae density (cells/L) | RUE | Features of cyanobacterial bloom | Water phenomenon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | 0 ≤ D < 2.0 × 106 | 0 ≤ RUE ≤46.81 | No cyanobacterial bloom | There is no algae aggregation in water, and algae particles can generally not be recognized in water |
| Ⅱ | 2.0 × 106 ≤ D < 1.0 × 107 | 46.81 < RUE ≤106.68 | No obvious cyanobacterial bloom | A small concentration of algae on the surface, or a small number of algae particles can be identified in the water |
| Ⅲ | 1.0 × 107 ≤ D < 5.0 × 107 | RUE >106.68 | Present cyanobacterial bloom | Suspended algae particles can be seen in the water or algae gather into patches in the water |
Algal density, cyanobacteria percentage, and cyanobacterial RUE in each sampling site in the high-water period.
| Sampling sites | Algal density | Cyanobacteria percentage | Cyanobacterial RUE |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 1.63 | 28.57% | 38.95 |
| S2 | 1.51 | 14.68% | 24.46 |
| S3 | 1.64 | 11.86% | 16.99 |
| S4 | 1.39 | 11.72% | 6.65 |
| S5 | 1.48 | 11.62% | 8.16 |
| S6 | 1.20 | 19.83% | 13.14 |
| S7 | 1.02 | 61.99% | 53.19 |
| S8 | 0.68 | 79.83% | 87.20 |
| S9 | 1.24 | 32.69% | 5.12 |
| S10 | 0.70 | 84.78% | 56.23 |
| S11 | 0.42 | 91.36% | 423.19 |