Hans C J de Boer1, Desirée J G van den Bongard2, Bram van Asselen2. 1. Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht Cancer, The Netherlands. Electronic address: J.C.J.deBoer-6@UMCUtrecht.nl. 2. Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht Cancer, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Breath hold is increasingly used for cardiac sparing in left-sided breast cancer irradiation. We have developed a fast automated method to verify breath hold stability in each treatment fraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 504 patients treated with breath hold. Moderate deep inspiration breath hold was audio-guided. Medial and lateral large tangential field segments were delivered in a single breath hold and movieloops of these fields were acquired with an EPID. The thoracic wall position was automatically detected in each frame and the full range of thoracic wall motion (RTWM) was determined. If the RTWM >4mm more than 3 times, the patient was excluded from breath hold treatment if further coaching did not yield improvement. RESULTS: Unstable breath hold was observed in 2.8% of the patients. However, this frequency dropped from 9.5% in the first 6months to 1.6% in the subsequent 16months. The 97% of patients with proper breath hold showed excellent stability: the average RTWM was 0.9±0.5mm. The reproducibility of the breath hold depth was confirmed by (1) the small difference between the thoracic wall positions in the medial and lateral fields within one fraction and (2) the setup errors of breath hold patients showed no significant differences with those of right-sided breast patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and clinically applied an imaging tool to automatically determine stability of breath holds in each treatment fraction during beam delivery.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Breath hold is increasingly used for cardiac sparing in left-sided breast cancer irradiation. We have developed a fast automated method to verify breath hold stability in each treatment fraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 504 patients treated with breath hold. Moderate deep inspiration breath hold was audio-guided. Medial and lateral large tangential field segments were delivered in a single breath hold and movieloops of these fields were acquired with an EPID. The thoracic wall position was automatically detected in each frame and the full range of thoracic wall motion (RTWM) was determined. If the RTWM >4mm more than 3 times, the patient was excluded from breath hold treatment if further coaching did not yield improvement. RESULTS: Unstable breath hold was observed in 2.8% of the patients. However, this frequency dropped from 9.5% in the first 6months to 1.6% in the subsequent 16months. The 97% of patients with proper breath hold showed excellent stability: the average RTWM was 0.9±0.5mm. The reproducibility of the breath hold depth was confirmed by (1) the small difference between the thoracic wall positions in the medial and lateral fields within one fraction and (2) the setup errors of breath hold patients showed no significant differences with those of right-sided breast patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and clinically applied an imaging tool to automatically determine stability of breath holds in each treatment fraction during beam delivery.
Authors: Alison Ranger; Alex Dunlop; Alex Grimwood; Emily Durie; Ellen Donovan; Jo Havilland; Emma Harris; Helen McNair; Anna M Kirby Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-02-11