Literature DB >> 26900073

Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Caitlin Nelms2, Shaum P Bhagat2.   

Abstract

The mammalian cochlea functions as a filter bank that performs a spectral, Fourier-like decomposition on the acoustic signal. While tuning can be compromised (e.g., broadened with hearing impairment), whether or not human cochlear frequency resolution can be sharpened through experiential factors (e.g., training or learning) has not yet been established. Previous studies have demonstrated sharper psychophysical tuning curves in trained musicians compared to nonmusicians, implying superior peripheral tuning. However, these findings are based on perceptual masking paradigms, and reflect engagement of the entire auditory system rather than cochlear tuning, per se. Here, by directly mapping physiological tuning curves from stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs)-cochlear emitted sounds-we show that estimates of human cochlear tuning in a high-frequency cochlear region (4 kHz) is further sharpened (by a factor of 1.5×) in musicians and improves with the number of years of their auditory training. These findings were corroborated by measurements of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) derived via simultaneous masking, which similarly showed sharper tuning in musicians. Comparisons between SFOAE and PTCs revealed closer correspondence between physiological and behavioral curves in musicians, indicating that tuning is also more consistent between different levels of auditory processing in trained ears. Our findings demonstrate an experience-dependent enhancement in the resolving power of the cochlear sensory epithelium and the spectral resolution of human hearing and provide a peripheral account for the auditory perceptual benefits observed in musicians. Both local and feedback (e.g., medial olivocochlear efferent) mechanisms are discussed as potential mechanisms for experience-dependent tuning.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlea; Experience-dependent plasticity; Hearing; Musical training; Psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26900073     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  No Influence of Musicianship on the Effect of Contralateral Stimulation on Frequency Selectivity.

Authors:  Emilia Tarnowska; Andrzej Wicher; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Jie Wan; Ajanth Varathanathan; Sophie Naddell; Thomas Baer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Auditory T-Complex Reveals Reduced Neural Activities in the Right Auditory Cortex in Musicians With Absolute Pitch.

Authors:  Masato Matsuda; Hironaka Igarashi; Kosuke Itoh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Can Xu; Lisa Gold; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zhihang Qi; Mengmeng Yu; Jinhai Wang; Ruijuan Chen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-09-26

6.  Effect of Musical Experience on Cochlear Frequency Resolution: An Estimation of PTCs, DLF and SOAEs.

Authors:  Konika Kakar; J Prajna Bhat; Suresh Thontadarya
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.