Literature DB >> 26899471

Glasgow Prognostic Score may be a prognostic index for overall and perioperative survival in gastric cancer without perioperative treatment.

Nathaniel Melling1, Amica Grüning2, Michael Tachezy2, Michael Nentwich2, Matthias Reeh2, Faik G Uzunoglu2, Yogesh K Vashist2, Jakob R Izbicki2, Dean Bogoevski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation is a key factor in tumor growth. C-reactive protein and albumin are parameters of systemic inflammation from the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic role of GPS in a homogeneous population of gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment only.
METHODS: Patients underwent operations between 2009 and 2014. Those who had received perioperative treatment or had other malignancies or inflammatory diseases were excluded. Eighty-eight patients met all inclusion criteria (age >18 years, documented preoperative serum levels of albumin and C-reactive protein, histologically proven gastric cancer, curative operation, including lymphadenectomy). C-reactive protein and albumin levels were retrieved from our prospective database. GPS was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome.
RESULTS: Increasing GPS was linked to aggressive tumor biology in terms of tumor size (GPS 0: 51.2% T1 and T2, 48.8% T3 and T4; GPS 1: 23.8% T1 and T2, 76.2% T3 and T4; GPS 2: 23.1% T1 and T2, 76.9% T3 and T4; P = .026), synchronous distant metastases (GPS 0: 47.1% M0, 0.0% M1; GPS 1: 25.9% M0, 0.0% M1; GPS 2: 27.1% M0, 100.0% M1; P = .030), venous vessel invasion (GPS 0: 91.2% V0, 8.8% V1; GPS 1: 66.7% V0, 33.3% V1; GPS 2: 55.0% V0, 45.0% V1; P = .008), resection margin status (GPS 0: 97.4% R0, 2.6% R1; GPS 1: 90.0% R0, 10.0% R1; GPS 2: 77.3% R0, 22.7% R1; P = .044), reduced overall survival (GPS 0: median 25.2 months [range 0.4-106.0]; GPS 1: 15.3 [0.2-59.5]; GPS 2: 5.8 [0.1-55.3]; P = .016) with median overall survival in the whole cohort being 16.2 months (range 0.1-106.0) and perioperative mortality (GPS 0: 0.0% of perioperative deaths, GPS 1: 20.0%, GPS 2: 80.0%; P = .036). Furthermore, GPS was identified as an independent prognosticator of overall survival (P = .033). A gradual decrease in survival between GPS subgroups was evident.
CONCLUSION: GPS represents an independent prognostic factor for long-term outcome in resected gastric cancer patients without perioperative treatment and is strongly associated with perioperative mortality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899471     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  19 in total

1.  Peking Prognostic Score, Based on Preoperative Sarcopenia Status, Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jianping Xiong; Haitao Hu; Wenzhe Kang; Yang Li; Peng Jin; Xinxin Shao; Weikun Li; Yantao Tian
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Response and Nutritional Markers in Patients With Trastuzumab-treated Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Masahiro Maeda; Keiichiro Yokota; Nobuhisa Tanioka; Ian Fukudome; Jun Iwabu; Masaya Munekage; Sunao Uemura; Hiromichi Maeda; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Tumor volume increases the predictive accuracy of prognosis for gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study of 3409 patients.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Peng Gao; Shushang Liu; Gaozan Zheng; Jianjun Yang; Li Sun; Liu Hong; Daiming Fan; Hongwei Zhang; Fan Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?

Authors:  Tomoyuki Wakahara; Nozomi Ueno; Tetsuo Maeda; Kiyonori Kanemitsu; Takuro Yoshikawa; Shinobu Tsuchida; Akihiro Toyokawa
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2018-01-03

5.  Comparison of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in a Cohort of Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  G Jomrich; M Paireder; A Gleiss; I Kristo; L Harpain; S F Schoppmann
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  The modified glasgow prognostic score is an independent prognostic indicator in neoadjuvantly treated adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Gerd Jomrich; Marlene Hollenstein; Maximilian John; Andreas Baierl; Matthias Paireder; Ivan Kristo; Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu; Reza Asari; Matthias Preusser; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-08

7.  Preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index is a useful prognostic indicator in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hirahara; Takeshi Matsubara; Yusuke Fujii; Shunsuke Kaji; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Tetsu Yamamoto; Yuki Uchida; Yoshiko Miyazaki; Kazunari Ishitobi; Yasunari Kawabata; Yoshitsugu Tajima
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-06-16

8.  Inflammatory markers for predicting overall survival in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mi-Rae Kim; A-Sol Kim; Hye-In Choi; Jae-Hun Jung; Ji Yeon Park; Hae-Jin Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.

Authors:  Jianping Xiong; Haitao Hu; Wenzhe Kang; Hao Liu; Fuhai Ma; Shuai Ma; Yang Li; Peng Jin; Yantao Tian
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ross D Dolan; Jason Lim; Stephen T McSorley; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.