Literature DB >> 26898519

Accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by three-dimensional guided vascularised fibular free flap after segmental mandibulectomy.

J Weitz1, F J M Bauer2, A Hapfelmeier3, N H Rohleder2, K-D Wolff2, M R Kesting2.   

Abstract

Mandibular reconstruction with a fibular free flap has become standard in specialised centres for head and neck reconstruction, particularly for defects with more than one osteotomy that are challenging even for experienced surgeons. Virtual surgical planning is a potential tool to facilitate harvesting of the fibula and the osteostomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the two methods of mandibular reconstruction - conventionally planned (conventional group) and "virtually" planned (virtual group) - with regard to accuracy, bony consolidation, complications, and operating time. Fifty patients who required mandibular reconstruction after segmental mandibulectomy were evaluated retrospectively, 24 virtually planned and 26 conventionally planned. The overall survival of flaps was 92% (46/50). The bony consolidation rate in the virtual group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (p=0.002). The difference between the angle of the mandible before and after was highly significant with a median of 11.5° (range 2°-75°) in the conventional group and 4.5° (range 0-18°) in the virtual group (p=0.0001). Operations were mean (SD) of 34 (21.2) minutes shorter in virtually-planned cases (p=0.12). The overall morbidity did not differ significantly between the groups. The use of virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction by fibular free flap is beneficial for optimising accuracy, consolidation of bony segments, and operating time, while increasing the predictability of results for the surgeon. However, additional costs have to be carefully weighed against the benefits.
Copyright © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free fibula flaps; Mandibular reconstruction; Segmental mandibulectomy; Virtual planned surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26898519     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  13 in total

1.  Primary radical ablative surgery and fibula free-flap reconstruction for T4 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with mandibular invasion: oncologic and functional results and their predictive factors.

Authors:  Olivier Camuzard; Olivier Dassonville; Marc Ettaiche; Emmanuel Chamorey; Gilles Poissonnet; Riadh Berguiga; Axel Leysalle; Karen Benezery; Frédéric Peyrade; Esma Saada; Raphael Hechema; Anne Sudaka; Juliette Haudebourg; François Demard; José Santini; Alexandre Bozec
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Mandibular shape prediction model using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Tania Camila Niño-Sandoval; Robinson Andrés Jaque; Fabio A González; Belmiro C E Vasconcelos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study.

Authors:  Thibault De Maesschalck; Delphine S Courvoisier; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Long-term endothelial dysfunction in irradiated vessels: an immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Raimund H M Preidl; Patrick Möbius; Manuel Weber; Kerstin Amann; Friedrich W Neukam; Marco Kesting; Carol-Immanuel Geppert; Falk Wehrhan
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Virtual Surgical Planning: The Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Johnny I Efanov; Andrée-Anne Roy; Ke N Huang; Daniel E Borsuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-17

7.  Virtual Planning and 3D printing modeling for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap.

Authors:  W Ren; L Gao; S Li; C Chen; F Li; Q Wang; Y Zhi; J Song; Z Dou; L Xue; K Zhi
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 8.  Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts.

Authors:  Afnan F Alfouzan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  The Learning Curve of Computer-Assisted Free Flap Jaw Reconstruction Surgery Using 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Plates: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.

Authors:  Wang-Yong Zhu; Wing Shan Choi; May Chun Mei Wong; Jingya Jane Pu; Wei-Fa Yang; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Thomas Mücke; Diandra Hart; Tobias Unterhuber; Victoria Kehl; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.