Literature DB >> 26895919

Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety.

Ally Murji1, Lea Luketic2,3, Mara L Sobel2, Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram4, Nicholas Leyland3, Glenn Posner5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Answering telephone calls and pagers is common distraction in the operating room. We sought to evaluate the impact of distractions on patient care by (1) assessing the accuracy and safety of responses to clinical questions posed to a surgeon while operating and (2) determining whether pager distractions affect simulation-based surgical performance.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover study of obstetrics and gynecology residents. After studying a patient sign-out list, subjects performed a virtual salpingectomy. They were randomized to a distraction phase followed by quiet phase or vice versa. In the distraction phase, a pager beeped and subjects were asked questions based on the sign-out list. Accuracy of responses and the number of unsafe responses were recorded. In the quiet phase, trainees performed the task uninterrupted. Measures of surgical performance were successful task completion, time to task completion and operative blood loss.
RESULTS: The mean score for correct responses to clinical questions during the distracted phase was 80 % (SD ±14 %). Nineteen residents (63 %) made at least 1 unsafe clinical decision while operating on the simulator (range 0-3). Subjects were more likely to successfully complete the surgical task in the allotted time under the quiet compared to distraction condition (OR 11.3, p = 0.03). There was no difference between the conditions in paired analysis for mean time (seconds) to task completion [426 (SD 133) vs. 440 (SD 186), p = 0.61] and mean operative blood loss (mL) [73.14 (SD 106) vs. 112.70 (SD 358), p = 0.47].
CONCLUSIONS: Distractions in the operating room may have a profound impact on patient safety on the wards. While multitasking in a simulated setting, the majority of residents made at least one unsafe clinical decision. Pager distractions also hindered surgical residents' ability to complete a simulated laparoscopic task in the allotted time without affecting other variables of surgical performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecology; Patient safety; Postgraduate surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895919     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4782-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; T Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  C R Larsen; T Grantcharov; R Aggarwal; A Tully; J L Sørensen; T Dalsgaard; B Ottesen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks.

Authors:  Kristen H Goodell; Caroline G L Cao; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

Authors:  A N Healey; N Sevdalis; C A Vincent
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006 Apr 15-May 15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.

Authors:  K E Hsu; F-Y Man; R A Gizicki; L S Feldman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Danny V Martinec; Maria A Cassera; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Louise Hull; Nick Sevdalis; Tanya Tierney; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons.

Authors:  Robin L Feuerbacher; Kenneth H Funk; Donn H Spight; Brian S Diggs; John G Hunter
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11

9.  Effect of distraction on the performance of endourological tasks: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjolein C Persoon; Kim van Putten; Arno M M Muijtjens; J Alfred Witjes; Ad J M Hendrikx; Albert J J M Scherpbier
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure?

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Sonja N Buzink; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

2.  Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Camilla Göras; Karolina Olin; Maria Unbeck; Karin Pukk-Härenstam; Anna Ehrenberg; Mesfin Kassaye Tessma; Ulrica Nilsson; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.