Literature DB >> 26895187

Time resolution of the plastic scintillator strips with matrix photomultiplier readout for J-PET tomograph.

P Moskal1, O Rundel, D Alfs, T Bednarski, P Białas, E Czerwiński, A Gajos, K Giergiel, M Gorgol, B Jasińska, D Kamińska, Ł Kapłon, G Korcyl, P Kowalski, T Kozik, W Krzemień, E Kubicz, Sz Niedźwiecki, M Pałka, L Raczyński, Z Rudy, N G Sharma, A Słomski, M Silarski, A Strzelecki, A Wieczorek, W Wiślicki, P Witkowski, M Zieliński, N Zoń.   

Abstract

Recent tests of a single module of the Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomography system (J-PET) consisting of 30 cm long plastic scintillator strips have proven its applicability for the detection of annihilation quanta (0.511 MeV) with a coincidence resolving time (CRT) of 0.266 ns. The achieved resolution is almost by a factor of two better with respect to the current TOF-PET detectors and it can still be improved since, as it is shown in this article, the intrinsic limit of time resolution for the determination of time of the interaction of 0.511 MeV gamma quanta in plastic scintillators is much lower. As the major point of the article, a method allowing to record timestamps of several photons, at two ends of the scintillator strip, by means of matrix of silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) is introduced. As a result of simulations, conducted with the number of SiPM varying from 4 to 42, it is shown that the improvement of timing resolution saturates with the growing number of photomultipliers, and that the [Formula: see text] configuration at two ends allowing to read twenty timestamps, constitutes an optimal solution. The conducted simulations accounted for the emission time distribution, photon transport and absorption inside the scintillator, as well as quantum efficiency and transit time spread of photosensors, and were checked based on the experimental results. Application of the [Formula: see text] matrix of SiPM allows for achieving the coincidence resolving time in positron emission tomography of [Formula: see text]0.170 ns for 15 cm axial field-of-view (AFOV) and [Formula: see text]0.365 ns for 100 cm AFOV. The results open perspectives for construction of a cost-effective TOF-PET scanner with significantly better TOF resolution and larger AFOV with respect to the current TOF-PET modalities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895187     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Total Body PET: Why, How, What for?

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin R Pantel; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 2.  Scanner Design Considerations for Long Axial Field-of-View PET Systems.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-11-05

3.  Novel scintillating material 2-(4-styrylphenyl)benzoxazole for the fully digital and MRI compatible J-PET tomograph based on plastic scintillators.

Authors:  Anna Wieczorek; Kamil Dulski; Szymon Niedźwiecki; Dominika Alfs; Piotr Białas; Catalina Curceanu; Eryk Czerwiński; Andrzej Danel; Aleksander Gajos; Bartosz Głowacz; Marek Gorgol; Beatrix Hiesmayr; Bożena Jasińska; Krzysztof Kacprzak; Daria Kamińska; Łukasz Kapłon; Andrzej Kochanowski; Grzegorz Korcyl; Paweł Kowalski; Tomasz Kozik; Wojciech Krzemień; Ewelina Kubicz; Mateusz Kucharek; Muhsin Mohammed; Monika Pawlik-Niedźwiecka; Marek Pałka; Lech Raczyński; Zbigniew Rudy; Oleksandr Rundel; Neha G Sharma; Michał Silarski; Tomasz Uchacz; Wojciech Wiślicki; Bożena Zgardzińska; Marcin Zieliński; Paweł Moskal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genuine Multipartite Entanglement in the 3-Photon Decay of Positronium.

Authors:  Beatrix C Hiesmayr; Pawel Moskal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Performance assessment of the 2 γpositronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners.

Authors:  P Moskal; D Kisielewska; R Y Shopa; Z Bura; J Chhokar; C Curceanu; E Czerwiński; M Dadgar; K Dulski; J Gajewski; A Gajos; M Gorgol; R Del Grande; B C Hiesmayr; B Jasińska; K Kacprzak; A Kamińska; Ł Kapłon; H Karimi; G Korcyl; P Kowalski; N Krawczyk; W Krzemień; T Kozik; E Kubicz; P Małczak; M Mohammed; Sz Niedźwiecki; M Pałka; M Pawlik-Niedźwiecka; M Pędziwiatr; L Raczyński; J Raj; A Ruciński; S Sharma; S Shivani; M Silarski; M Skurzok; E Ł Stępień; S Vandenberghe; W Wiślicki; B Zgardzińska
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Witnessing Entanglement In Compton Scattering Processes Via Mutually Unbiased Bases.

Authors:  Beatrix C Hiesmayr; Pawel Moskal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Varsha Viswanath; Michael J Geagan; Gerd Muehllehner; Austin R Pantel; Michael J Parma; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey P Schmall; Matthew E Werner; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.082

8.  Almost complete solution for the NP-hard separability problem of Bell diagonal qutrits.

Authors:  Christopher Popp; Beatrix C Hiesmayr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  A feasibility study of ortho-positronium decays measurement with the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators.

Authors:  D Kamińska; A Gajos; E Czerwiński; D Alfs; T Bednarski; P Białas; C Curceanu; K Dulski; B Głowacz; N Gupta-Sharma; M Gorgol; B C Hiesmayr; B Jasińska; G Korcyl; P Kowalski; W Krzemień; N Krawczyk; E Kubicz; M Mohammed; Sz Niedźwiecki; M Pawlik-Niedźwiecka; L Raczyński; Z Rudy; M Silarski; A Wieczorek; W Wiślicki; B Zgardzińska; M Zieliński; P Moskal
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.590

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.