Literature DB >> 26895159

Functional evaluation of an iridotomy in primary angle closure eyes.

Ramanjit Sihota1, Karandeep Rishi2, Geetha Srinivasan2, Viney Gupta2, Tanuj Dada2, Kulwant Singh3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional efficacy of an iridotomy in primary angle closure (PAC) eyes by measuring IOP responses to provocative tests before and after iridotomy.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SUBJECTS: 50 consecutive adult patients, 40-60 years of age, having primary angle closure.
METHODS: Clinical examination, perimetry, biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy of the angle were done. A darkroom prone provocative test (DRPPT), a mydriatic test and a Valsalva maneuver were performed before and after the iridotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP change in response to the provocative tests before and after iridotomy, and correlation with baseline parameters.
RESULTS: IOP at baseline and after iridotomy was 14.4 ± 2.7 mmHg and 14.3 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.)83. There was no significant change on diurnal phasing before and after an iridotomy (p = 0.)11. The mean IOP rise was 5.9 ± 3.7 mmHg on the DRPPT, 4.3 ± 3.5 mmHg on the Mydriatic test and 9.1 ± 4.9 mmHg on the Valsalva maneuver, and was reduced significantly to 3.2 ± 2.1 mmHg, 2.3 ± 1.8 and 6.4 ± 3.5, respectively(p < 0.001 for all tests). The decrease in pupillary block component for all 50 eyes was 46.5 % for the mydriatic test, 45.8 % for the DRPPT and 29.7 % for the Valsalva maneuver. PAC eyes positive on the DRPPT and mydriatic test prior to an iridotomy became negative after laser iridotomy in 75.9 and 84.6 % eyes, respectively, but on the Valsalva maneuver, only 23.8 % became negative. After iridotomy, eyes that continued to be positive on the mydriatic test had a significantly thicker lens (p = 0.02), decreased TCPD (p = 0.014) and narrower trabecular-iris angle (p = 0.048). On the DRPPT, they had a thicker lens (p = 0.03), shorter iris thickness (p = 0.025) and TCPD (p = 0.032), and on the Valsalva maneuver, they had a narrower scleral-ciliary process angle (SCPA; p = 0.019) and shorter TCPD (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive functional evaluation of laser iridotomy in early PAC eyes showed a significant reduction in the pupillary block component of IOP response to provocative testing, possibly decreasing IOP fluctuations over time. An iridotomy does not, however, significantly change mean IOP or diurnal phasing of IOP in PAC eyes. Eyes with a very narrow angle or a thick lens may continue to have angle closure due to other pathomechanisms for angle closure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional evaluation; Laser iridotomy; PAC; Pupillary block component

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895159     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3298-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  40 in total

1.  An ultrasound biomicroscopic study of the anterior segment in Indian eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Garudadri; Vidya Chelerkar; Rishita Nutheti
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Analysis of anterior segment dynamics using anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and after laser peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Ce Zheng; Celeste P Guzman; Carol Y Cheung; Yingke He; David S Friedman; Sim-Heng Ong; Arun K Narayanaswamy; Paul T Chew; Shamira A Perera; Tin Aung
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Prevalence and mechanism of appositional angle closure in acute primary angle closure after iridotomy.

Authors:  Barry Y M Yeung; Philip W C Ng; Thomas Y H Chiu; Chi Wai Tsang; Felix C H Li; Chung Chai Chi; Jimmy S M Lai; Clement C Y Tham; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation of primary angle closure disease following laser peripheral iridotomy/iridoplasty.

Authors:  Yan-Yun Chen; Lan-Ping Sun; Ravi Thomas; Yuan-Bo Liang; Su-Jie Fan; Xia Sun; Si-Zhen Li; Shao-Dan Zhang; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects: biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: the Liwan Eye Study.

Authors:  Mingguang He; David S Friedman; Jian Ge; Wenyong Huang; Chenjin Jin; Pak Sang Lee; Peng T Khaw; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Diurnal intraocular pressure fluctuation and associated risk factors in eyes with angle closure.

Authors:  Mani Baskaran; Rajesh S Kumar; Chitra V Govindasamy; Hla Myint Htoon; Ching-Yee Wong; Shamira A Perera; Tina T L Wong; Tin Aung
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  G Marchini; A Pagliarusco; A Toscano; R Tosi; C Brunelli; L Bonomi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic features associated with angle closure in fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure after laser iridotomy.

Authors:  Bao-qun Yao; Ling-ling Wu; Chun Zhang; Xin Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Peripheral iris thickness and association with iridotrabecular contact after laser peripheral iridotomy in patients with primary angle-closure and primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Takanori Mizoguchi; Mineo Ozaki; Harumi Wakiyama; Nobuchika Ogino
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and ultrasonographic parameters in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma and eyes with mature cataract.

Authors:  Sujata Subbiah; Philip A Thomas; C A Nelson Jesudasan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Lasers in glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsh Kumar; Tarannum Mansoori; Gazella B Warjri; Bindu I Somarajan; Suman Bandil; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Water-drinking Test and Pharmacologic Mydriasis as Provocative Tests in Primary Angle Closure Suspects.

Authors:  Reza Razeghinejad; M Hossein Nowroozzadeh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2019-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.