Literature DB >> 26895032

Pocket ultrasound device as a complement to physical examination for ascites evaluation and guided paracentesis.

Daniel Keil-Ríos1, Hiram Terrazas-Solís2, Alejandro González-Garay3, Juan Francisco Sánchez-Ávila1, Ignacio García-Juárez4.   

Abstract

The pocket ultrasound device (PUD) is a new tool that may be of use in the early detection of ascites. Abdominal ultrasound-guided paracentesis has been reported to decrease the rate of complications due to the procedure, but must be performed in a healthcare setting; this new tool may be a useful on an ambulatory basis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of the PUD in the diagnosis of ascites and the safety of guided paracentesis. We conducted a retrospective study that included adult patients suspected of having ascites and in whom an evaluation was performed with the PUD to identify it. Concordance with abdominal ultrasound (AUS) was determined with the Kappa coefficient. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and likelihood ratios (LR) were determined and compared with physical examination, AUS, computed tomography and procurement of fluid by paracentesis. Complications resulting from the guided paracentesis were analyzed. 89 participants were included and 40 underwent a paracentesis. The PUD for ascites detection had 95.8 % Se, 81.8 % Sp, 5.27 +LR and 0.05 -LR. It had a concordance with AUS of 0.781 (p < 0.001). Technical problems during the guided paracentesis were present in only two participants (5 %) and three patients (7.5 %) developed minor complications that required no further intervention. There were no severe complications or deaths. This study suggests that the PUD is a reliable tool for ascites detection as a complement to physical examination and appears to be a safe method to perform guided paracentesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ascites; Handheld; Paracentesis; Pocket; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895032     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1406-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  23 in total

Review 1.  EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Choosing the location for non-image guided abdominal paracentesis.

Authors:  Hideki Sakai; Todd A Sheer; Michel H Mendler; Bruce A Runyon
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.828

3.  Incremental value of pocket-sized imaging device for bedside diagnosis of unilateral pleural effusions and ultrasound-guided thoracentesis.

Authors:  Matteo Lisi; Matteo Cameli; Sergio Mondillo; Luca Luzzi; Valerio Zacà; Paolo Cameli; Giuseppe Gotti; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-19

4.  Ultrasonic determination of ascites.

Authors:  B B Goldberg; H R Clearfield; G A Goodman; J O Morales
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1973-02

5.  Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis?

Authors:  C Bard; M Lafortune; G Breton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Do pocket-sized ultrasound machines have the potential to be used as a tool to triage patients in obstetrics and gynecology?

Authors:  A Sayasneh; J Preisler; A Smith; S Saso; O Naji; Y Abdallah; C Stalder; A Daemen; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Comparison of a pocket-size ultrasound device with a premium ultrasound machine: diagnostic value and time required in bedside ultrasound examination.

Authors:  Konrad Friedrich Stock; Bettina Klein; Dominik Steubl; Christian Lersch; Uwe Heemann; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Florian Eyer; Dir-Andre Clevert
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

8.  Paracentesis of ascitic fluid. A safe procedure.

Authors:  B A Runyon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-11

9.  Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study.

Authors:  Maurizio Galderisi; Alessandro Santoro; Marco Versiero; Vincenzo Schiano Lomoriello; Roberta Esposito; Rosa Raia; Francesca Farina; Pier Luigi Schiattarella; Manuela Bonito; Marinella Olibet; Giovanni de Simone
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting.

Authors:  Matthieu Biais; Cédric Carrié; François Delaunay; Nicolas Morel; Philippe Revel; Gérard Janvier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of Trainee Competency with Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS): a Conceptual Framework and Review of Existing Assessments.

Authors:  Andre Kumar; John Kugler; Trevor Jensen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Abdominal Paracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Joel Cho; Trevor P Jensen; Kreegan Reierson; Benji K Mathews; Anjali Bhagra; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Loretta Grikis; Michael Mader; Ria Dancel; Brian P Lucas; Nilam J Soni
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 3.  The Use of Handheld Ultrasound Devices in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Adrienne N Malik; Jonathan Rowland; Brian D Haber; Stephanie Thom; Bradley Jackson; Bryce Volk; Robert R Ehrman
Journal:  Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep       Date:  2021-05-11

4.  Integrating Point of Care Ultrasound Education into Clinical Practice at the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Kamonwon Ienghong; Lap Woon Cheung; Somsak Tiamkao; Vajarabhongsa Bhudhisawasdi; Korakot Apiratwarakul
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Assessment of peripheral muscle thickness and architecture in healthy volunteers using hand-held ultrasound devices; a comparison study with standard ultrasound.

Authors:  Peter Turton; Richard Hay; Ingeborg Welters
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Handheld Ultrasound Device Usage and Image Acquisition Ability Among Internal Medicine Trainees: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jessica Buesing; Yingjie Weng; John Kugler; Libo Wang; Ondrej Blaha; Jason Hom; Neera Ahuja; Andre Kumar
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-29

7.  Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Change the Needle Insertion Location During Routine Bedside Paracentesis?

Authors:  David M Rodrigues; Arjun Kundra; Lawrence Hookey; Steven Montague
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.473

8.  ESR statement on portable ultrasound devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-16

9.  Performance of a Handheld Ultrasound Device to Assess Articular and Periarticular Pathologies in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis.

Authors:  Giulia Corte; Sara Bayat; Koray Tascilar; Larissa Valor-Mendez; Louis Schuster; Johannes Knitza; Filippo Fagni; Georg Schett; Arnd Kleyer; David Simon
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.