Literature DB >> 26893136

[The future of radiology: What can we expect within the next 10 years?].

F Nensa1, M Forsting2, A Wetter2.   

Abstract

More than other medical discipline, radiology is marked by technical innovation and continuous development, as well as the optimization of the underlying physical principles. In this respect, several trends that will crucially change and develop radiology over the next decade can be observed. Through the use of ever faster computer tomography, which also shows an ever-decreasing radiation exposure, the "workhorse" of radiology will have an even greater place and displace conventional X‑ray techniques further. In addition, hybrid imaging, which is based on a combination of nuclear medicine and radiological techniques (keywords: PET/CT, PET/MRI) will become much more established and, in particular, will improve oncological imaging further, allowing increasingly individualized imaging for specific tracers and techniques of functional magnetic resonance imaging for a particular tumour. Future radiology will be strongly characterized by innovations in the software and Internet industry, which will enable new image viewing and processing methods and open up new possibilities in the context of the organization of radiological work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; 3D visualization; Dose management; Hybrid process; Low-dose CT; Machine Learning; Standardized Reporting; Teleradiology; Virtual/Augmented Reality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26893136     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  12 in total

Review 1.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Yukihiro Nagatani; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata; Mitsuru Ikeda; Tsuneo Yamashiro; Tetsuhiro Miyara; Hisanobu Koyama; Mitsuhiro Koyama; Yukihisa Sato; Hiroshi Moriya; Satoshi Noma; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Yoshiharu Ohno; Sadayuki Murayama
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure--proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011.

Authors:  John M Boone; William R Hendee; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptions.

Authors:  Andrej Karpathy; Li Fei-Fei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  A Afshar-Oromieh; U Haberkorn; H P Schlemmer; M Fenchel; M Eder; M Eisenhut; B A Hadaschik; A Kopp-Schneider; M Röthke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology: initial results.

Authors:  Jürgen F Schäfer; Sergios Gatidis; Holger Schmidt; Brigitte Gückel; Ilja Bezrukov; Christina A Pfannenberg; Matthias Reimold; Martin Ebinger; Jörg Fuchs; Claus D Claussen; Nina F Schwenzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Combined PET/MR: The Real Work Has Just Started. Summary Report of the Third International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 17-21, 2014, Tübingen, Germany.

Authors:  D L Bailey; G Antoch; P Bartenstein; H Barthel; A J Beer; S Bisdas; D A Bluemke; R Boellaard; C D Claussen; C Franzius; M Hacker; H Hricak; C la Fougère; B Gückel; S G Nekolla; B J Pichler; S Purz; H H Quick; O Sabri; B Sattler; J Schäfer; H Schmidt; J van den Hoff; S Voss; W Weber; H F Wehrl; T Beyer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualization applied to multimodal brain images: clinical applications and a functional connectivity atlas.

Authors:  Gonzalo M Rojas; Marcelo Gálvez; Natan Vega Potler; R Cameron Craddock; Daniel S Margulies; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Big data in imaging].

Authors:  Philipp Sewerin; Benedikt Ostendorf; Axel J Hueber; Arnd Kleyer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Annotation of enhanced radiographs for medical image retrieval with deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Obioma Pelka; Felix Nensa; Christoph M Friedrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.