Literature DB >> 26892946

Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.

Walaa Hussein Abu El-Ela1, Mary Medhat Farid1, Mostafa Saad El-Din Mostafa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital intraoral and extraoral bitewing (EO BW) radiography in the detection of enamel proximal caries regardless of their ability to separate contacts.
METHODS: Artificial caries with different degrees of decalcification was induced in 80 human sound premolars and molars using formic acid. Intraoral radiographs were taken with photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), using the paralleling bitewing technique. Extraoral bitewing radiographs were obtained using Sirona digital panoramic X-ray unit (Sirona Siemens, Bensheim, Germany). In total, 160 proximal surfaces were assessed by 2 observers twice. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) values for each image type, observer and reading were compared using z-tests, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value for each observer and reading were calculated.
RESULTS: Spearman's test showed a strong positive correlation between the duration of demineralization and histological grading of carious teeth surfaces. For the three radiographic techniques, intraobserver reliability was strong to excellent. Moreover, interobserver agreement was strong. The differences between all detection methods were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Intraoral bitewing using CMOS sensor had the highest sensitivity while EO BW had the highest specificity in the detection of incipient proximal caries.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the ex vivo design, the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the three radiographic techniques was not significant. EO BW could be used in the detection of enamel proximal caries with results comparable with intraoral bitewing with PSP plate and CMOS sensor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bitewing; dental caries; digital; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26892946      PMCID: PMC4846173          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  28 in total

1.  Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.

Authors:  R Haak; M J Wicht; M J Noack
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning.

Authors:  Hanne Hintze; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth.

Authors:  E Onem; B G Baksi; B H Sen; O Sögüt; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study.

Authors:  P R Dias da Silva; M Martins Marques; W Steagall; F Medeiros Mendes; C A Lascala
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Utility of radiology, laser fluorescence, and transillumination.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Vinicius Dutra
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2005-10

6.  Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.

Authors:  W E R Berkhout; J G C Verheij; K Syriopoulos; G Li; G C H Sanderink; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.

Authors:  F Haiter-Neto; A Wenzel; E Gotfredsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  K Kamburoglu; E Kolsuz; S Murat; S Yüksel; T Ozen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.

Authors:  H Hintze; A Wenzel
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Accuracy of Digital Bitewing Radiography versus Different Views of Digital Panoramic Radiography for Detection of Proximal Caries.

Authors:  Mehrdad Abdinian; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Reyhaneh Faghihian; Amir Abbas Samety; Elham Faghihian
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  The importance of digital radiographic systems in dental schools and oral radiology centers as part of reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Eduardo Murad Villoria; Renata Costa Val Rodrigues; Carlos Humberto do Nascimento Pereira; Gabriella Serrão Abreu Conceição; Rodrigo Villamarim Soares
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-28

2.  Reproducibility and diagnostic value of a new wedge-guided bitewing image receptor-holding device.

Authors:  Deivi Cascante-Sequeira; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Danieli Moura Brasil; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study.

Authors:  Kug Jin Jeon; Sang-Sun Han; Chena Lee; Yoon Joo Choi; Hoi In Jung; Young Hyun Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Oyunbat Dashpuntsag; Midori Yoshida; Ryosuke Kasai; Naoki Maeda; Hidehiko Hosoki; Eiichi Honda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  COVID-19 and beyond: implications for dental radiography.

Authors:  Rachel Little; Jessica Howell; Paul Nixon
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.727

Review 6.  Guidelines for oral and maxillofacial imaging: COVID-19 considerations.

Authors:  David S MacDonald; Dan C Colosi; Muralidhar Mupparapu; Vandana Kumar; Werner H Shintaku; Mansur Ahmad
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-10-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.