| Literature DB >> 26892461 |
Helena U Westergren1, Sara Svedlund2,3, Remi A Momo4, Juuso I Blomster5,6, Karin Wåhlander7, Erika Rehnström8, Peter J Greasley9, Regina Fritsche-Danielson10, Jan Oscarsson11, Li-Ming Gan12,13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with angina-like symptoms without myocardial perfusion scintigram (MPS)-verified abnormality may still be at risk for cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that insulin resistance could play a role in this population even without diagnosed diabetes. We further explored physiological and blood biomarkers, as well as global gene expression patterns that could be closely related to impaired glucose homeostasis to deepen our mechanistic understanding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26892461 PMCID: PMC4759743 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-016-0353-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1A flow-scheme illustrating the patient recruitment process
Baseline characteristics of study cohort
| Whole study population (n = 365) | Without perfusion defects (n = 238) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62 ± 9 | 61 ± 9 |
| Women | 202 (55 %) | 150 (63 %) |
| Body mass index | 25.7 ± 3.5 | 25.4 ± 3.5 |
| Current smoker | 47 (13 %) | 31 (13 %) |
| Family history of CAD | 142 (39 %) | 89 (37 %) |
| ACE-inhibitors | 69 (19 %) | 32 (13 %) |
| Beta-blockers | 173 (47 %) | 96 (40 %) |
| Statins | 146 (40 %) | 83 (35 %) |
| Aspirin | 178 (49 %) | 102 (43 %) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 144 ± 23 | 144 ± 22 |
| Known CAD | 94 (26 %) | 44 (18 %) |
| Previous MI | 51 (14 %) | 19 (8 %) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) (n = 362) | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 1.1 (0.8–1.3) (n = 235) |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) (n = 360) | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 5.4 ± 1.1 (n = 234) |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.47 (1.24–1.72) | 1.49 (1.29–1.75) |
| ApoB/ApoA1 | 0.64 (0.53–0.79) | 0.62 (0.52–0.76) |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5 |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 94 (69–125) | 92 (69–122) |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol, %) | 36.6 ± 3.8 (5.5 ± 0.3 %) | 36.2 ± 3.5 (5.5 ± 0.32 %) |
| HOMA-IR | 3.1 (2.3–4.3) | 3.1 (2.3–4.1) |
| RHI (n = 345) | 1.89 (1.55–2.47) | 1.91 (1.59–2.48) (n = 225) |
Values are displayed as mean ± SD or median and interquartile range for continuous variables and frequency and percentages for categorical variables
ApoA apolipoprotein A, ApoB apolipoprotein B, HbA glycosylated hemoglobin, HDL high density lipoprotein cholesterol. MI myocardial infarction, Known CAD previously known coronary artery disease, RHI reactive hyperemic index
Univariate and multivariable adjustment of HOMA-IR as predictor of clinical outcome
| Univariate model | Multivariable model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95 % CI) | p value | HR (95 % CI) | p value | |
| Age | 1.05 (1.03–1.08) | <0.001 | 1.04 (1.01–1.07) | 0.007 |
| Known CAD | 3.27 (2.10–5.10) | <0.001 | 1.87 (1.15–3.05) | 0.012 |
| Gender | 3.10 (1.92–5.01) | <0.001 | 1.92 (1.11–3.35) | 0.020 |
| HOMA-IR above median | 2.72 (1.70–4.46) | <0.001 | 1.88 (1.09–3.26) | 0.023 |
| HDL | 0.38 (0.19–0.75) | 0.005 | 0.82 (0.41–1.63) | 0.570 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.036 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.693 |
| Body mass index | 1.05 (0.99–1.12) | 0.120 | 1.00 (0.92–1.08) | 0.915 |
Survival analyses on the whole study population of non-diabetic patients with suspected myocardial ischemia. Data are presented with hazard ratio and 95 % CI, (n = 365)
CI confidence interval, HDL high density lipoprotein cholesterol, HR hazard ratio Known CAD previously known coronary artery disease
Fig. 2COX regression analyses between HOMA-IR below and above median on non-diabetic patients with suspected myocardial ischemia (n = 365). In a COX regression analysis a HOMA-IR above median provides an independent prognostic value predicting long-term events in the whole study population. In a COX regression analysis b HOMA-IR provides independent prognostic information in non-diabetic patients with no myocardial perfusion defects (HR: 2.7, p = 0.02, n = 238), but not in patients with myocardial perfusion defects (HR: 1.7, p = 0.14, n = 127). Statistics are presented as Chi square values and HR. Gr group, HR hazard ratio
Univariate and multivariable parameters associated to reactive hyperemic index in patients without myocardial perfusion defects
| Univariate | Multivariable model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95 % CI) | p | β (95 % CI) | p | |
| HOMA-IR above median | −0.273 (−0.443–0.102) | 0.002 | −0.230 (−0.426–0.034) | 0.022 |
| Body mass index | −0.020 (−0.046–0.006) | 0.129 | −0.009 (−0.038–0.020) | 0.548 |
| HDL | 0.160 (−0.068–0.388) | 0.167 | 0.079 (−0.176–0.335) | 0.541 |
| Gender | 0.124 (−0.057–0.305) | 0.177 | −0.028 (−0.241–0.185) | 0.795 |
| Known CAD | 0.139 (−0.083–0.362) | 0.219 | 0.091 (−0.143–0.324) | 0.444 |
Linear regression analyses on non-diabetic patients without myocardial perfusion defects (n = 225)
CI confidence interval, HDL high density lipoprotein cholesterol, Known CAD previously known coronary artery disease
Fig. 3Global gene expression pathway analysis on patients without myocardial perfusion defects (n = 54). Red bars predict an overall increase in the activity of the pathway (activation) while blue bars indicate a prediction of an overall decrease in activity (deactivation/inhibition). White bars are those with a z-score which is zero or very close to zero. The overall activation/inhibition (deactivation) states of the pathways are predicted based on a Z-score algorithm. Z-score gives a statistical measure of the relationship of up and downregulated gene transcripts in the microarray data set with-respect-to a particular pathway. This Z-score is used to mathematically compare the microarray data set with the canonical pathway patterns. A pathway is predicted as activated or inhibited by comparing the expected pattern (up/downregulation of key genes in the pathway) if the pathway is activated against the actual pattern (up/downregulated key genes) in the microarray data set. If the actual pattern matches the expected pattern, the Z-score is positive (Z-score > ~2 = activated pathway) otherwise negative (Z-score <2 = inhibited pathway)