Ram Kandasamy1, Jonas J Calsbeek2, Michael M Morgan3. 1. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States. Electronic address: ram_kandasamy@wsu.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States. 3. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States; Department of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The assessment of nociception in preclinical studies is undergoing a transformation from pain-evoked to pain-depressed tests to more closely mimic the effects of clinical pain. Many inflammatory pain-depressed behaviors (reward seeking, locomotion) have been examined, but these tests are limited because of confounds such as stress and difficulties in quantifying behavior. NEW METHOD: The present study evaluates home cage wheel running as an objective method to assess the magnitude and duration of inflammatory pain in male and female rats. RESULTS: Injection of Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) into the right hindpaw to induce inflammatory pain almost completely inhibited wheel running for 2 days in male and female rats. Wheel running gradually returned to baseline levels within 12 days despite persistent mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey test). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Continuously monitoring home cage wheel running improves on previous studies examining inflammatory pain-depressed wheel running because it is more sensitive to noxious stimuli, avoids the stress of removing the rat from its cage for testing, and provides a complete analysis of the time course for changes in nociception. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that home cage wheel running is a clinically relevant method to assess inflammatory pain in the rat. The decrease in activity caused by inflammatory pain and subsequent gradual recovery mimics the changes in activity caused by pain in humans. The tendency for pain-depressed wheel running to be greater in female than male rats is consistent with the tendency for women to be at greater risk of chronic pain than men.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of nociception in preclinical studies is undergoing a transformation from pain-evoked to pain-depressed tests to more closely mimic the effects of clinical pain. Many inflammatory pain-depressed behaviors (reward seeking, locomotion) have been examined, but these tests are limited because of confounds such as stress and difficulties in quantifying behavior. NEW METHOD: The present study evaluates home cage wheel running as an objective method to assess the magnitude and duration of inflammatory pain in male and female rats. RESULTS: Injection of Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) into the right hindpaw to induce inflammatory pain almost completely inhibited wheel running for 2 days in male and female rats. Wheel running gradually returned to baseline levels within 12 days despite persistent mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey test). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Continuously monitoring home cage wheel running improves on previous studies examining inflammatory pain-depressed wheel running because it is more sensitive to noxious stimuli, avoids the stress of removing the rat from its cage for testing, and provides a complete analysis of the time course for changes in nociception. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that home cage wheel running is a clinically relevant method to assess inflammatory pain in the rat. The decrease in activity caused by inflammatory pain and subsequent gradual recovery mimics the changes in activity caused by pain in humans. The tendency for pain-depressed wheel running to be greater in female than male rats is consistent with the tendency for women to be at greater risk of chronic pain than men.
Authors: N Andrews; E Legg; D Lisak; Y Issop; D Richardson; S Harper; T Pheby; W Huang; G Burgess; I Machin; A S C Rice Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Nicola J Stagg; Heriberto P Mata; Mohab M Ibrahim; Erik J Henriksen; Frank Porreca; Todd W Vanderah; T Philip Malan Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Joel D Greenspan; Rebecca M Craft; Linda LeResche; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Karen J Berkley; Roger B Fillingim; Michael S Gold; Anita Holdcroft; Stefan Lautenbacher; Emeran A Mayer; Jeffrey S Mogil; Anne Z Murphy; Richard J Traub Journal: Pain Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: S Stevens Negus; Bradley Neddenriep; Ahmad A Altarifi; F Ivy Carroll; Michael D Leitl; Laurence L Miller Journal: Pain Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Vanessa L Oliver; Stephanie Athavale; Katherine E Simon; Lon V Kendall; Jean A Nemzek; Jennifer L Lofgren Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 1.232