Literature DB >> 26891745

Evaluation of a training programme to induct medical students in delivering public health talks.

Ngiap Chuan Tan1,2, Shah Mitesh1,2,3, Yi Ling Eileen Koh1, Seng Bin Ang2,3,4, Hian Hui Vincent Chan5, Choon How How6, Ee Guan Tay1,2,3, Siew Wai Hwang1,2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is uncommon for medical students to deliver public health talks as part of their medical education curriculum. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel training programme that required medical students to deliver public health talks during their family medicine (FM) clerkship in a Singapore primary care institution.
METHODS: The FM faculty staff guided teams of third-year medical students to select appropriate topics for health talks that were to be conducted at designated polyclinics. The talks were video-recorded and appraised for clarity, content and delivery. The appraisal was done by the student's peers and assigned faculty staff. The audience was surveyed to determine their satisfaction level and understanding of the talks. The students also self-rated the effectiveness of this new teaching activity.
RESULTS: A total of 120 medical students completed a questionnaire to rate the effectiveness of the new teaching activity. 85.8% of the students felt confident about the delivery of their talks, 95.8% reported having learnt how to deliver talks and 92.5% perceived this new training modality as useful in their medical education. Based on the results of the audience survey, the speakers were perceived as knowledgeable (53.1%), confident (51.3%) and professional (39.0%). Assessment of 15 video-recorded talks showed satisfactory delivery of the talks by the students.
CONCLUSION: The majority of the students reported a favourable overall learning experience under this new training programme. This finding is supported by the positive feedback garnered from the audience, peers of the medical students and the faculty staff. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association

Keywords:  medical student; public health talk; undergraduate medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26891745      PMCID: PMC5331126          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  7 in total

1.  Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.

Authors:  James W Navalta; T Scott Lyons
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings.

Authors:  Xiaoye May Wang; Kin Fai Ellick Wong; Jessica Y Y Kwong
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2010-05

3.  The challenge of providing the public with actionable information during a pandemic.

Authors:  Leslie E Gerwin
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Family physician preceptors' conceptualizations of health advocacy: implications for medical education.

Authors:  Maria M Hubinette; Rola Ajjawi; Shafik Dharamsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The impact of leadership and team behavior on standard of care delivered during human patient simulation: a pilot study for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Jim Carlson; Elana Min; Diane Bridges
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 6.  Teaching teamwork in medical education.

Authors:  Susan Lerner; Diane Magrane; Erica Friedman
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2009-08

7.  Evidence-based history taking under "time constraint".

Authors:  Alireza Moayyeri; Akbar Soltani; Hamideh Moosapour; Mohsin Raza
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.852

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.