Literature DB >> 26890981

Fundamental Considerations for Biobank Legacy Planning.

Lise Anne Marie Matzke1, Benjamin Fombonne2, Peter Hamilton Watson1,3, Helen Marie Moore2.   

Abstract

Biobanking in its various forms is an activity involving the collection of biospecimens and associated data and their storage for differing lengths of time before use. In some cases, biospecimens are immediately used, but in others, they are stored typically for the term of a specified project or in perpetuity until the materials are used up or declared to be of little scientific value. Legacy planning involves preparing for the phase that follows either biobank closure or a significant change at an operational level. In the case of a classical finite collection, this may be brought about by the completion of the initial scientific goals of a project, a loss of funding, or loss of or change in leadership. Ultimately, this may require making a decision about when and where to transfer materials or whether to destroy them. Because biobanking in its entirety is a complex endeavour, legacy planning touches on biobank operations as well as ethical, legal, financial, and governance parameters. Given the expense and time that goes into setting up and maintaining biobanks, coupled with the ethical imperative to appropriately utilize precious resources donated to research, legacy planning is an activity that every biobanking entity should think about. This article describes some of the fundamental considerations for preparing and executing a legacy plan, and we envisage that this article will facilitate dialogue to help inform best practices and policy development in the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26890981      PMCID: PMC4855774          DOI: 10.1089/bio.2015.0073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  12 in total

1.  Scientific collections. The legacy plan.

Authors:  Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Custodianship as an ethical framework for biospecimen-based research.

Authors:  Rihab Yassin; Nicole Lockhart; Mariana González del Riego; Karen Pitt; Jeffrey W Thomas; Linda Weiss; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Closure of population biobanks and direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies.

Authors:  Ma'n H Zawati; Pascal Borry; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Nottingham Health Science Biobank: a sustainable bioresource.

Authors:  Balwir Matharoo-Ball; Brian J Thomson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Biobank research: time for discussion and debate.

Authors:  A Dhai; S Mahomed
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  Biobankonomics: developing a sustainable business model approach for the formation of a human tissue biobank.

Authors:  Jimmie Vaught; Joyce Rogers; Todd Carolin; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

7.  A framework for biobank sustainability.

Authors:  Peter H Watson; Sara Y Nussbeck; Candace Carter; Sheila O'Donoghue; Stefanie Cheah; Lise A M Matzke; Rebecca O Barnes; John Bartlett; Jane Carpenter; William E Grizzle; Randal N Johnston; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Leigh Murphy; Katherine Sexton; Lois Shepherd; Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Nikolajs Zeps; Brent Schacter
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  The boom and bust cycle of biobanking - thinking through the life cycle of biobanks.

Authors:  Aaro Tupasela; Neil Stephens
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Neglected ethical issues in biobank management: Results from a U.S. study.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Dragana Lassiter; Kaaren Haldeman; Ian Conlon; Erik Reavely; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Ian Conlon; Anders G Nelson; James P Evans; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  6 in total

1.  "Forward-Thinking" in U.S. Biobanking.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Dragana Lassiter; Arlene M Davis; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-01-24

2.  Critical Financial Challenges for Biobanking: Report of a National Cancer Institute Study.

Authors:  Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Bill Tulskie; Dorie Olson; Hana Odeh; Jeffrey McLean; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  The Availability of Human Biospecimens to Support Biomarker Research.

Authors:  Tamsin E Tarling; Jennifer A Byrne; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Building Research Support Capacity across Human Health Biobanks during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer A Byrne; Jane E Carpenter; Candace Carter; Kathleen Phillips; Stephen Braye; Peter H Watson; Amanda Rush
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 5.  Biobanking for Cancer Biomarker Research: Issues and Solutions.

Authors:  Lise A Matzke; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2020-10-19

Review 6.  Basic principles of biobanking: from biological samples to precision medicine for patients.

Authors:  Laura Annaratone; Giuseppe De Palma; Giuseppina Bonizzi; Anna Sapino; Gerardo Botti; Enrico Berrino; Chiara Mannelli; Pamela Arcella; Simona Di Martino; Agostino Steffan; Maria Grazia Daidone; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Barbara Parodi; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Massimo Barberis; Caterina Marchiò
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.