OBJECTIVES: To identify distinct frailty trajectories (clusters of individuals following a similar progression of frailty over time) in an aging population and to estimate associations between frailty trajectories and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Olmsted County, Minnesota residents aged 60-89 in 2005. MEASUREMENTS: Longitudinal changes in frailty between 2005 and 2012 were measured by constructing a yearly Rockwood frailty index incorporating body mass index, 17 comorbidities, and 14 activities of daily living. The frailty index measures variation in health status as the proportion of deficits present of the 32 considered (range 0-1). RESULTS: Of the 16,443 Olmsted County residents aged 60-89 in 2005, 12,270 (74.6%) had at least 3 years of frailty index measures and were retained for analysis. The median baseline frailty index increased with age (0.11 for 60-69, 0.14 for 70-79, 0.19 for 80-89). Three distinct frailty trajectories were identified in individuals aged 60-69 at baseline and two trajectories in those aged 70-79 and 80-89. Within each decade of age, increasing frailty trajectories were associated with greater risks of emergency department visits, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for baseline frailty index. CONCLUSION: The number of frailty trajectories differed according to age. Within each age group, those in the highest frailty trajectory had greater healthcare use and worse survival. Frailty trajectories may offer a way to target aging individuals at high risk of hospitalization or death for therapeutic or preventive interventions.
OBJECTIVES: To identify distinct frailty trajectories (clusters of individuals following a similar progression of frailty over time) in an aging population and to estimate associations between frailty trajectories and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Olmsted County, Minnesota residents aged 60-89 in 2005. MEASUREMENTS: Longitudinal changes in frailty between 2005 and 2012 were measured by constructing a yearly Rockwood frailty index incorporating body mass index, 17 comorbidities, and 14 activities of daily living. The frailty index measures variation in health status as the proportion of deficits present of the 32 considered (range 0-1). RESULTS: Of the 16,443 Olmsted County residents aged 60-89 in 2005, 12,270 (74.6%) had at least 3 years of frailty index measures and were retained for analysis. The median baseline frailty index increased with age (0.11 for 60-69, 0.14 for 70-79, 0.19 for 80-89). Three distinct frailty trajectories were identified in individuals aged 60-69 at baseline and two trajectories in those aged 70-79 and 80-89. Within each decade of age, increasing frailty trajectories were associated with greater risks of emergency department visits, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for baseline frailty index. CONCLUSION: The number of frailty trajectories differed according to age. Within each age group, those in the highest frailty trajectory had greater healthcare use and worse survival. Frailty trajectories may offer a way to target aging individuals at high risk of hospitalization or death for therapeutic or preventive interventions.
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Joshua J Pankratz; Scott M Brue; Walter A Rocca Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-18 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Lior Bibas; Michael Levi; Melissa Bendayan; Louis Mullie; Daniel E Forman; Jonathan Afilalo Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Alanna M Chamberlain; Jennifer L St Sauver; Debra J Jacobson; Sheila M Manemann; Chun Fan; Véronique L Roger; Barbara P Yawn; Lila J Finney Rutten Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Venicius Dantas da Silva; Sheilla Tribess; Joilson Meneguci; Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Douglas de Assis Teles Santos; José Ailton Oliveira Carneiro; Jair Sindra Virtuoso Júnior Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anna Torné; Emma Puigoriol; Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo; Juan-José Zamora-Sánchez; Sebastià Santaeugènia; Jordi Amblàs-Novellas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lauren E Griffith; Parminder Raina; David Kanters; David Hogan; Christopher Patterson; Alexandra Papaioannou; Julie Richardson; Anne Gilsing; Mary Thompson; Edwin van den Heuvel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rachel E Ward; Ariela R Orkaby; Clark Dumontier; Brian Charest; Chelsea E Hawley; Enzo Yaksic; Lien Quach; Dae H Kim; David R Gagnon; J Michael Gaziano; Kelly Cho; Luc Djousse; Jane A Driver Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Daniel Stow; Fiona E Matthews; Stephen Barclay; Steve Iliffe; Andrew Clegg; Sarah De Biase; Louise Robinson; Barbara Hanratty Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668