Literature DB >> 26889135

Impact of Obesity on Complications of Laparoscopic Simple or Radical Nephrectomy.

Nicolas Arfi1, Arnaud Baldini1, Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci2, Rene Ecochard3, Alain Ruffion1, Philippe Paparel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of obesity on complications in laparoscopic simple or radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical files of 215 patients who underwent laparoscopic simple or radical nephrectomy in our center between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. A body mass index of 30 kg/m² was used to divide the patients into obese and non-obese groups. Pre-operative data and intra- and post-operative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: There were respectively 163 and 52 patients in the non-obese and obese groups, which were comparable in terms of age, sex, and history of surgery. In the obese group, operative specimens were significantly heavier (772 vs. 534 g in the non-obese group; p = 0.005) and durations of surgery was significantly longer (244 vs. 216 minutes; p = 0.003). However no significant differences were found between the 2 groups for duration of hospitalization, surgical conversion, estimated blood loss, or intra- or post-operative complications.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic simple or radical nephrectomy is technically feasible in obese patients but the surgery may take more time, notably due to dissection difficulties. Our results showed that the risk of intra- and post-operative complications is not higher in obese patients compared to non-obese patients, except for a possible, but statistically undemonstrated, higher risk of abdominal wall complications, and that the laparoscopic approach should be the preferred technique in patients with high body mass index.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Nephrectomy; Obesity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26889135      PMCID: PMC4748803          DOI: 10.1159/000365707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  27 in total

1.  Obesity in living kidney donors: clinical characteristics and outcomes in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Sandra J Taler; Mikel Prieto; Fernando G Cosio; Stephen C Textor; Yogish C Kudva; George K Chow; Michael B Ishitani; Timothy S Larson; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Measurement of peri-prostatic fat thickness using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS): a new risk factor for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Greg Trottier; Malik Elharram; Kimberly A Fernandes; Gina Lockwood; Ants Toi; Karen M Hersey; Antonio Finelli; Andrew Evans; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for renal cancer: the University of California, Irvine, technique.

Authors:  Phillip Mucksavage; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Edward E Cherullo; Anoop M Meraney; Fred Borsuk; David P Murphy; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Fat: a matter of disturbance for the immune system.

Authors:  Alessandro Federico; Elena D'Aiuto; Francesco Borriello; Giusi Barra; Antonietta Gerarda Gravina; Marco Romano; Raffaele De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Influence of obesity on immune function.

Authors:  D C Nieman; D A Henson; S L Nehlsen-Cannarella; M Ekkens; A C Utter; D E Butterworth; O R Fagoaga
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1999-03

8.  Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jason W Anast; Marshall L Stoller; Maxwell V Meng; Viraj A Master; Joseph A Mitchell; William W Bassett; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of different extraction sites used during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vincent G Bird; Jason K Au; Yekutiel Sandman; Rosely De Los Santos; Rajnikanth Ayyathurai; John M Shields
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese and nonobese patients: outcomes stratified by body mass index.

Authors:  Marc T Feder; Manoj B Patel; Arnold Melman; Reza Ghavamian; David M Hoenig
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Techniques - Speculum-assisted approach for efficient open laparoscopic port access in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Ryan McLarty; Andrew Rasmussen; Michael Hobart; Howard Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Pushing the Envelope: Laparoscopic Nephrectomy as Outpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Nessn H Azawi; Tom Christensen; Claus Dahl; Lars Lund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Impact of Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Patients With Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tiffany Darbas; Geraud Forestier; Sophie Leobon; Julia Pestre; Pierre Jesus; Denis Lachatre; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Aurelien Descazeaud; Elise Deluche
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy

Authors:  Erkan Ölçücüoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 0.973

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.