Literature DB >> 26889124

Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer According to Anatomical Areas of Sampling Cores Obtained with Transrectal Systematic 12-Core Biopsy.

Hiromoto Tei1, Hideaki Miyake1, Ken-Ichi Harada1, Masato Fujisawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the diagnostic performance of 12-core biopsy in detecting significant prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thisstudy included 206 PCa patients who underwent transrectal 12-core biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy specimens were anatomically divided into 12 areas according to the sampling cores, and the existence of significant cancer, defined by a tumor volume > 0.5 ml, was investigated. The detection rate of significant cancer in each area was calculated as follows: the number of positive core biopsies/the number of areas containing significant cancer × 100.
RESULTS: The overall detection rate of significant cancer in all areas was 53.6%. The detection rate was significantly higher in the standard sextant cores than in the additional 6 cores in patients with prostate-specific antigen ≥ 10 ng/ml, clinical stage ≥ T2, or biopsy Gleason score ≥ 7, but not in those with prostate-specific antigen < 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c, or biopsy Gleason score ≤ 6.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the significant cancers were not accurately detected, and the detection rates in biopsy cores other than the sextant cores appeared to be significantly lower in PCa patients with aggressive features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Significant cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26889124      PMCID: PMC4748761          DOI: 10.1159/000365696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  20 in total

Review 1.  Is an initial saturation prostate biopsy scheme better than an extended scheme for detection of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingkang Jiang; Shimiao Zhu; Guowei Feng; Zhihong Zhang; Changying Li; Hui Li; Chao Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Can saturation biopsy predict prostate cancer localization in radical prostatectomy specimens: a correlative study and implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Sara M Falzarano; Ming Zhou; Adrian V Hernandez; Ayman S Moussa; J Stephen Jones; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection.

Authors:  C K Naughton; D C Miller; D E Mager; D K Ornstein; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rahul Thaly; Ketul Shah
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Additional sampling of dorsal apex on systematic prostate biopsy: impact on early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Miyake; Ken-ichi Harada; Taka-aki Inoue; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; F S Freiha; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; A S Whittemore; H P Schmid
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Clinical staging error in prostate cancer: localization and relevance of undetected tumour areas.

Authors:  Christian Bolenz; Michael Gierth; Rainer Grobholz; Thomas Köpke; Axel Semjonow; Christel Weiss; Peter Alken; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.