| Literature DB >> 26887661 |
Christiane Hassenrück1, Artur Fink2, Anna Lichtschlag3, Halina E Tegetmeyer4, Dirk de Beer2, Alban Ramette5.
Abstract
To understand how ocean acidification (OA) influences sediment microbial communities, naturally CO2-rich sites are increasingly being used as OA analogues. However, the characterization of these naturally CO2-rich sites is often limited to OA-related variables, neglecting additional environmental variables that may confound OA effects. Here, we used an extensive array of sediment and bottom water parameters to evaluate pH effects on sediment microbial communities at hydrothermal CO2 seeps in Papua New Guinea. The geochemical composition of the sediment pore water showed variations in the hydrothermal signature at seep sites with comparable pH, allowing the identification of sites that may better represent future OA scenarios. At these sites, we detected a 60% shift in the microbial community composition compared with reference sites, mostly related to increases in Chloroflexi sequences. pH was among the factors significantly, yet not mainly, explaining changes in microbial community composition. pH variation may therefore often not be the primary cause of microbial changes when sampling is done along complex environmental gradients. Thus, we recommend an ecosystem approach when assessing OA effects on sediment microbial communities under natural conditions. This will enable a more reliable quantification of OA effects via a reduction of potential confounding effects. © FEMS 2016.Entities:
Keywords: microbial community composition; natural laboratories; next generation sequencing; ocean acidification; shallow-water hydrothermal vents
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26887661 PMCID: PMC4828923 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194
Environmental conditions at the sampling sites on Normanby and Dobu Island, Papua New Guinea. Values are given as mean ± standard error. For pH, oxygen concentration and temperature microprofiles mean values per hydrothermal influence category were calculated based on median values per sediment layer (0–2 cm, 2–4 cm).
| Reef 1 | Reef 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sediment layer | Reference | Medium | High | Reference | Medium | High | |
| Water depth (m) | 3.87 ± 0.08 | 4.30 ± 0.48 | 3.74 ± 0.56 | 3.50 ± 0.00 | 2.50 ± 0.08 | 2.30 ± 0.23 | |
| pH | 0–2 cm | 7.86 ± 0.23 | 7.15 ± 0.24 | 6.67 ± 0.21 | |||
| 2–4 cm | 7.75 ± 0.20 | 6.64 ± 0.40 | 6.53 ± 0.31 | ||||
| O2 (μmol L−1) | 0–2 cm | 16.28 ± 2.25 | 5.78 ± 4.70 | 0.41 ± 0.33 | |||
| 2–4 cm | 0.17 ± 0.42 | 0.12 ± 0.08 | 0 | ||||
| T (°C) | 0–2 cm | 29.80 ± 0.35 | 30.26 ± 0.14 | 30.49 ± 1.55 | |||
| 2–4 cm | 29.86 ± 0.38 | 30.69 ± 0.20 | 31.56 ± 2.57 | ||||
| Porosity | 0–2 cm | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | |||
| 2–4 cm | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ±0.03 | ||||
| Permeability (m2) | 0–4 cm | (8.24 ± 0.81) × 10–11 | (3.57 ± 0.87) × 10–11 | (2.96 ± 0.02) × 10–11 | |||
| pH | Bottom water | 8.24 ± 0.02 | 7.83 ± 0.08 | 7.53 ± 0.13 | 8.33 ± 0.00 | 7.56 ± 0.05 | 6.78 ± 0.02 |
| TA (mmol L−1) | Bottom water | 2.51 ± 0.02 | 2.50 ± 0.02 | 2.60 ± 0.03 | 2.42 ± 0.02 | 2.47 ± 0.02 | 2.52 ± 0.03 |
| SiO4 (μmol L−1) | Bottom water | 3.06 ± 0.18 | 5.17 ± 0.97 | 14.92 ± 3.17 | 4.26 ± 0.04 | 20.06 ± 3.48 | 50.95 ± 4.90 |
| PO4 (μmol L−1) | Bottom water | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 1.16 ± 0.65 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1.69 ± 0.72 |
| NO3 (μmol L−1) | Bottom water | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.08 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 3.37 ± 1.59 | 0.50 ± 0.17 | 0.96 ± 0.29 |
| NO2 (μmol L−1) | Bottom water | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| NH4 (μmol L−1) | Bottom water | 3.15 ± 2.55 | 2.47 ± 0.73 | 1.27 ± 0.79 | 0.76 ± 0.25 | 2.56 ± 1.56 | 1.33 ± 0.20 |
Figure 1.Principal component analysis (PCA) of the environmental conditions in the sediment at the sampling site at Reef 1 on Normanby Island to classify the sampling sites according to hydrothermal influence. The data are available at Pangaea (http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.858033, http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.858091). For oxygen, pH, temperature and redox potential microprofiles, the PCA was calculated with median values for each sediment layer. Missing values were replaced by the mean of the respective parameter for the calculation of the PCA. The arrows show the loadings of the environmental parameters scaled to 4 times their value for better visualization. DIC, dissolved inorganic carbon; TA, total alkalinity; TIC, total inorganic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TOC, total organic carbon.
Figure 2.Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NDMS) plot based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix of the microbial community based on automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). Larger symbols mark the subset of samples that was used in the redundancy analysis (RDA) models with sediment parameters (Table 2).
Contribution of observed environmental parameters to explaining the variation in microbial community structure based on redundancy analysis (RDA)-based variation partitioning. To compare the explanatory power of different sets of environmental parameters, several RDA models were tested: the complete ARISA data set was analysed using bottom water parameters and hydrothermal influence categories; a subset of the ARISA data was analysed using bottom water, sediment parameters and hydrothermal influence categories. The bacterial and archaeal amplicon data sets were analysed using hydrothermal influence categories.
| Data set | Model | Source of variation | Total R2 adjusted | Pure R2 adjusted | F | df | P-value | Covariation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARISA | Bottom water | All | 0.277 | 5.126 | 9,88 | <0.001 | ||
| complete | (AIC = 574.1) | Reef | 0.067 | 0.037 | 5.555 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.030 |
| Position along reef | 0.051 | 0.034 | 5.163 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.017 | ||
| Water depth | 0.049 | 0.034 | 5.149 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.015 | ||
| SiO4 | 0.055 | 0.029 | 4.540 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
| PO4 | 0.028 | 0.025 | 4.068 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.003 | ||
| NO3 | 0.017 | 0.015 | 2.827 | 1,88 | 0.028 | 0.002 | ||
| NO2 | 0.018 | 0.008 | 1.962 | 1,88 | 0.272 | 0.010 | ||
| TA | 0.033 | 0.015 | 2.900 | 1,88 | 0.025 | 0.017 | ||
| pH | 0.041 | 0.029 | 4.547 | 1,88 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| Categories | All | 0.198 | 9.789 | 3,104 | <0.001 | |||
| (AIC = 638.5) | Reef | 0.059 | 0.061 | 8.999 | 1,104 | <0.001 | −0.002 | |
| Hydrothermal influence | 0.137 | 0.139 | 10.185 | 2,104 | <0.001 | −0.002 | ||
| ARISA | Bottom water | All | 0.352 | 5.665 | 5,38 | <0.001 | ||
| subset | (AIC = 248.6) | Position along reef | 0.080 | 0.056 | 4.378 | 1,38 | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Water depth | 0.068 | 0.059 | 4.531 | 1,38 | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||
| SiO4 | 0.097 | 0.066 | 4.994 | 1,38 | <0.001 | 0.031 | ||
| NO3 | 0.066 | 0.041 | 3.442 | 1,38 | 0.024 | 0.025 | ||
| pH | 0.045 | 0.043 | 3.579 | 1,38 | 0.025 | 0.003 | ||
| Sediment | All | 0.436 | 5.156 | 8,35 | <0.001 | |||
| (AIC = 244.84) | Water depth | 0.068 | 0.057 | 4.632 | 1,35 | <0.001 | 0.011 | |
| SiO4 | 0.097 | 0.117 | 8.486 | 1,35 | <0.001 | −0.020 | ||
| Porosity | 0.029 | 0.043 | 3.728 | 1,35 | <0.001 | −0.014 | ||
| Permeability | 0.069 | 0.043 | 3.721 | 1,35 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
| O2 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 1.763 | 1,35 | 0.002 | 0.004 | ||
| Redox potential | 0.038 | 0.011 | 1.693 | 1,35 | 0.037 | 0.027 | ||
| Temperature | 0.051 | 0.052 | 4.314 | 1,35 | <0.001 | −0.001 | ||
| pH | 0.088 | 0.038 | 3.457 | 1,35 | <0.001 | 0.050 | ||
| Categories (AIC = 251.8) | Hydrothermal influence | 0.259 | 8.500 | 2,41 | <0.001 | |||
| 16S Bacteria | Categories (AIC = 120.5) | Hydrothermal influence | 0.375 | 4.606 | 2,10 | <0.001 | ||
| 16S Archaea | Categories (AIC = 100.2) | Hydrothermal influence | 0.267 | 3.188 | 2,10 | <0.001 |
The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is given for each model as goodness-of-fit statistic.
Only the significance of the whole model (all) and the pure effects of the respective parameters (accounting for the effects of all other factors in the model) were tested. P-values were calculated based on restricted permutations.
Covariation constitutes the amount of variation that can be explained by more than the parameter of interest.
Bottom water silicate concentrations were used as proxy for pore water concentrations, because of a high correlation based on point measurements of selected samples.
Figure 3.Taxonomic composition of the 10 most abundant bacterial phyla (A) and archaeal genera (B) per sample at reference, medium and high HI (hydrothermal influence) sites. For Proteobacteria class-level resolution is shown; for taxa that were unclassified on the respective level of resolution, the next higher level classified taxonomic rank is shown. Asterisks mark significantly differentially abundant taxa between hydrothermal influence categories. SCG: Soil Crenarchaeotic Group, MHVG: Marine Hydrothermal Vent Group, DHVEG-6: Deep Sea Hydrothermal Vent Group 6.