Literature DB >> 26887566

Evaluation of the anatomic and refractive differences in hyperopic anisometropia.

Melis Palamar1, Cumali Degirmenci2, Elif Demirkilinc Biler2, Sait Egrilmez2, Onder Uretmen2, Ayse Yagci2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interocular symmetry of ultrasonic biometric characteristics and anterior segment measurements between the fellow eyes of hyperopic anisometropes. Forty-two healthy hyperopic anisometropic cases (1 D mean spherical equivalent difference between eyes) without strabismus were recruited. A range of refractive and ultrasonic biometric parameters were measured in both eyes of each subject including keratometry, mean spherical equivalent, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, vitreous depth (VD), axial length (AL), and anterior segment parameters (central corneal thickness (CCT), ACD, anterior chamber volume (ACV)) with Pentacam. Mean spherical equivalent anisometropia was 2.66 ± 1.233 (range 1.125 and 6.25) D, and there was a strong correlation between the degree of anisometropia and the interocular difference in AL (r = 0.632, P < 0.001). A total of 61.3 % of the anisometropia was related with AL (50.7 %) and mean keratometry (10.6 %). Every 1 mm change in AL and every 1 D change in mean keratometry caused a total of 2.82 D and 2.14 D refractive difference, respectively. Among Pentacam parameters, ACD was correlated with ACV (r = 0.528; P < 0.001) and AL (r = 0.510; P = 0.001); ACV was correlated with VD (r = 0.358; P = 0.020); and CCT was correlated with ACV (r = 0.510; P = 0.001) and AL (r = 0.318; P = 0.040). Among ultrasonographic measurements, ultrasonic-ACD was correlated with CCT (r = 0.510; P = 0.001) and lens thickness (r = -0.556; P < 0.001), and VD was correlated with AL (r = 0.937, r 2 = 0.877, P < 0.001). The hyperopic and the fellow eyes displayed a high degree of interocular symmetry for the other measured parameters. AL and mean keratometry are the leading causes of hyperopic anisometropia. However, ACD as measured with Pentacam also shows difference in hyperopic anisometropic eyes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisometropia; Anterior segment; Eye; Pentacam; Refractive error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26887566     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0199-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  9 in total

1.  Anterior chamber depth and its associations with ocular and general parameters in adults.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Vinay Nangia; Rajesh Gupta; Anshu Khare; Ajit Sinha; Shubhra Agarwal; Karishna Bhate
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera.

Authors:  Tanja M Rabsilber; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Anisometropia and amblyopia--chicken or egg?

Authors:  A R Fielder; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia.

Authors:  Tahra AlMahmoud; David Priest; Rejean Munger; W Bruce Jackson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Interocular symmetry in myopic anisometropia.

Authors:  Stephen J Vincent; Michael J Collins; Scott A Read; Leo G Carney; Maurice K H Yap
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Influences of cyclopentolate hydrochloride on anterior segment parameters with Pentacam in children.

Authors:  Melis Palamar; Sait Egrilmez; Onder Uretmen; Ayse Yagci; Suheyla Kose
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Oculometric features of hyperopia in children with accommodative refractive esotropia.

Authors:  Onder Uretmen; Kemal Pamukçu; Süheyla Kose; Sait Egrilmez
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2003-06

8.  A comparison between the amblyopic eye and normal fellow eye ocular architecture in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Bob Z Wang; Deepa Taranath
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  The correlation of differences in the ocular component values with the degree of myopic anisometropia.

Authors:  Su-Young Kim; Soon Young Cho; Ji Wook Yang; Chan Su Kim; Young Chun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-09
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population-How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nóra Szentmáry; Alan Cayless; Veronika Röggla; Christina Leydolt; Jascha Wendelstein; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology.

Authors:  César Albarrán-Diego; Francisco Poyales; Esther López-Artero; Nuria Garzón; María García-Montero
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.