Literature DB >> 26886130

Heterozygosity, gender, and the growth-defense trade-off in quaking aspen.

Christopher T Cole1, Michael T Stevens2, Jon E Anderson3, Richard L Lindroth4.   

Abstract

Although plant growth is generally recognized to be influenced by allocation to defense, genetic background (e.g., inbreeding), and gender, rarely have those factors been addressed collectively. In quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), phenolic glycosides (PGs) and condensed tannins (CTs) constitute up to 30 % of leaf dry weight. To quantify the allocation cost of this chemical defense, we measured growth, defense chemistry, and individual heterozygosity (H obs at 16 microsatellite loci) for male and female trees in both controlled and natural environments. The controlled environment consisted of 12 juvenile genets grown for 3 years in a common garden, with replication. The natural environment consisted of 51 mature genets in wild populations, from which we sampled multiple ramets (trees) per genet. Concentrations of PGs and CTs were negatively correlated. PGs were uncorrelated with growth, but CT production represented a major cost. Across the range of CT levels found in wild-grown trees, growth rates varied by 2.6-fold, such that a 10 % increase in CT concentration occurred with a 38.5 % decrease in growth. H obs had a marked effect on aspen growth: for wild trees, a 10 % increase in H obs corresponded to a 12.5 % increase in growth. In wild trees, this CT effect was significant only in females, in which reproduction seems to exacerbate the cost of defense, while the H obs effect was significant only in males. Despite the lower growth rate of low-H obs trees, their higher CT levels may improve survival, which could account for the deficit of heterozygotes repeatedly found in natural aspen populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocation cost; Condensed tannin; Heterozygote advantage; Phenolic glycoside; Phenylpropanoid pathway

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26886130     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3577-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Condensed tannins increase nitrogen recovery by trees following insect defoliation.

Authors:  Michael D Madritch; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 2.  The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton; Julia Koricheva
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Genome-wide analysis of the structural genes regulating defense phenylpropanoid metabolism in Populus.

Authors:  Chung-Jui Tsai; Scott A Harding; Timothy J Tschaplinski; Richard L Lindroth; Yinan Yuan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Physiological trade-offs in the complexity of pine tree defensive chemistry.

Authors:  Luis Sampedro
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 5.  Tannins in plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Raymond V Barbehenn; C Peter Constabel
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  Influence of Genotype, Environment, and Gypsy Moth Herbivory on Local and Systemic Chemical Defenses in Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Authors:  Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; John J Couture; Ian T Major; C Peter Constabel; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars.

Authors:  S-Y Hwang; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  THE EVOLUTION OF CARBON ALLOCATION TO PLANT SECONDARY METABOLITES: A GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COST IN DIPLACUS AURANTIACUS.

Authors:  Kaiping Han; David E Lincoln
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Trade-off between synthesis of salicylates and growth of micropropagated Salix pentandra.

Authors:  Teija Ruuhola; Riitta Julkunen-Titto
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  6 in total

1.  Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species.

Authors:  Christopher T Cole; Clay J Morrow; Hilary L Barker; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Jennifer F L Riehl; Tobias G Köllner; Nathalie D Lackus; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Intraspecific variation in plant economic traits predicts trembling aspen resistance to a generalist insect herbivore.

Authors:  Clay J Morrow; Samuel J Jaeger; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Polyploidy and growth-defense tradeoffs in natural populations of western quaking Aspen.

Authors:  R Justin DeRose; Richard S Gardner; Richard L Lindroth; Karen E Mock
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Clonal Saplings of Trembling Aspen Do Not Coordinate Defense Induction.

Authors:  Olivia L Cope; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus .

Authors:  Athena D McKown; Jaroslav Klápště; Robert D Guy; Raju Y Soolanayakanahally; Jonathan La Mantia; Ilga Porth; Oleksandr Skyba; Faride Unda; Carl J Douglas; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Richard C Hamelin; Shawn D Mansfield; Quentin C B Cronk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genotypic variation in plant traits shapes herbivorous insect and ant communities on a foundation tree species.

Authors:  Hilary L Barker; Liza M Holeski; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.