Literature DB >> 26885757

Prognosis communication with older patients with multimorbidity: Assessment after an educational intervention.

Nancy L Schoenborn1, Danelle Cayea1, Matthew McNabney1, Anushree Ray1, Cynthia Boyd1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess how internal medicine residents incorporated prognosis to inform clinical decisions and communicated prognosis in primary care visits with older patients with multimorbidity after an educational intervention, and resident and patient perspectives regarding these visits. Assessment used mixed-methods. The authors assessed the frequency and content of prognosis discussions through residents' self-report and qualitative content analysis of audio-recorded clinic visits. The authors assessed the residents' perceived effect of incorporating prognosis on patient care and patient relationship through a resident survey. The authors assessed the patients' perceived quality of communication and trust in physicians through a patient survey. The study included 21 clinic visits that involved 12 first-year residents and 21 patients. Residents reported incorporating patients' prognoses to inform clinical decisions in 13/21 visits and perceived positive effects on patient care (in 11/13 visits) and patient relationship (in 7/13 visits). Prognosis communication occurred in 9/21 visits by self-report, but only in six of these nine visits by content analysis of audio-recordings. Patient ratings were high regardless of whether or not prognosis was communicated. In summary, after training, residents often incorporated patients' prognoses to inform clinical decisions, but sometimes did so without communicating prognosis to the patients. Residents and patients reported positive perceptions regarding the visits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum assessment; multimorbidity; older adults; prognosis communication; resident education

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26885757      PMCID: PMC5826548          DOI: 10.1080/02701960.2015.1115983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ        ISSN: 0270-1960


  38 in total

1.  Discussing prognosis: "how much do you want to know?" talking to patients who are prepared for explicit information.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2013 top five list in oncology.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Gary H Lyman; Douglas W Blayney; J Russell Hoverman; Derek Raghavan; Dana S Wollins; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Palliative and end-of-life care training during the surgical clerkship.

Authors:  Kathryn M Tchorz; S Bruce Binder; Mary T White; Larry W Lawhorne; Deborah M Bentley; Elizabeth A Delaney; Jerome Borchers; Melanie Miller; Linda M Barney; Margaret M Dunn; Kenneth W Rundell; Thavm Thambipillai; Randy J Woods; Ronald J Markert; Priti P Parikh; Mary C McCarthy
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care.

Authors:  Ruth Engelberg; Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  "Knowing is better": preferences of diverse older adults for discussing prognosis.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahalt; Louise C Walter; Lindsey Yourman; Catherine Eng; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Communication skills training for oncology professionals.

Authors:  David W Kissane; Carma L Bylund; Smita C Banerjee; Philip A Bialer; Tomer T Levin; Erin K Maloney; Thomas A D'Agostino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know?

Authors:  P N Butow; S Dowsett; R Hagerty; M H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  American Geriatrics Society identifies another five things that healthcare providers and patients should question.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Difficult conversations: teaching medical oncology trainees communication skills one hour at a time.

Authors:  Daniel E Epner; Walter F Baile
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  4 in total

1.  Shared Decision-Making During Inpatient Rounds: Opportunities for Improvement in Patient Engagement and Communication.

Authors:  Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Clinician Perspectives on Incorporating Patients' Values-Based Health Priorities in Decision-Making.

Authors:  Gregory M Ouellet; Eliza Kiwak; Darcé M Costello; Ariel R Green; Mary Geda; Aanand D Naik; Mary E Tinetti
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Geriatric Educational Interventions for Physicians Training in Non-Geriatric Specialties: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  En Ye Ong; Kelly J Bower; Louisa Ng
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  Advance care planning for vulnerable older adults within an Accountable Care Organization: study protocol for the IMPACT randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Gabbard; N M Pajewski; Kathryn E Callahan; Ajay Dharod; Kristie Foley; Keren Ferris; Adam Moses; Carl Grey; Jeff Williamson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.