| Literature DB >> 26885654 |
Tong Ding1, Kyle A Case1, Morrine A Omolo1, Holly A Reiland1, Zachary P Metz1, Xinyu Diao1, David J Baumler1,2,3.
Abstract
Microorganisms have evolved to occupy certain environmental niches, and the metabolic genes essential for growth in these locations are retained in the genomes. Many microorganisms inhabit niches located in the human body, sometimes causing disease, and may retain genes essential for growth in locations such as the bloodstream and urinary tract, or growth during intracellular invasion of the hosts' macrophage cells. Strains of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella spp. are thought to have evolved over 100 million years from a common ancestor, and now cause disease in specific niches within humans. Here we have used a genome scale metabolic model representing the pangenome of E. coli which contains all metabolic reactions encoded by genes from 16 E. coli genomes, and have simulated environmental conditions found in the human bloodstream, urinary tract, and macrophage to determine essential metabolic genes needed for growth in each location. We compared the predicted essential genes for three E. coli strains and one Salmonella strain that cause disease in each host environment, and determined that essential gene retention could be accurately predicted using this approach. This project demonstrated that simulating human body environments such as the bloodstream can successfully lead to accurate computational predictions of essential/important genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26885654 PMCID: PMC4757543 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Nutrients used to simulate three host environmental conditions.
| Metabolites | Macrophage | Blood | Urine |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Oxoglutarate | - | + | - |
| Acetoacetate | - | + | - |
| Adenine | - | - | + |
| Adenosine | - | + | - |
| Allantoin | + | + | + |
| Arabinose | + | - | - |
| Butyrate | - | + | + |
| Carnitine | + | - | - |
| Citrate | - | + | + |
| Cytosine | + | - | - |
| Deoxycytidine | + | - | - |
| Ethanolamine | + | - | + |
| Formate | - | - | + |
| Fructose | + | - | - |
| Fucose | + | - | - |
| Fumarate | - | + | - |
| Galactarate | + | - | - |
| Galactonate | + | - | - |
| Glucarate | + | - | - |
| Gluconate | + | - | - |
| Glucosamine | - | + | - |
| Glucose | + | + | + |
| Glucuronate | + | + | + |
| Guanine | - | - | + |
| Hypoxanthine | + | - | - |
| Inosine | + | - | - |
| D-lactate | - | + | + |
| L-lactate | - | + | + |
| L-Malate | - | + | - |
| D-Malate | - | + | - |
| Maltose | + | - | - |
| Mannitol | + | - | - |
| Mannose | + | - | - |
| Melibiose | + | - | - |
| Myo-Inositol | - | + | + |
| N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine | + | - | - |
| N-Acetylneuraminate | + | - | - |
| Nicotinate | - | + | - |
| Pantothenate | + | - | - |
| Propane-1,2-diol | + | - | - |
| Putrescine | + | - | - |
| Pyruvate | - | + | + |
| Rhamnose | + | - | - |
| Ribose | + | - | - |
| Sorbitol | + | - | - |
| Spermidine | + | - | - |
| Succinate | - | + | - |
| Taurine | - | - | + |
| Thiamin | + | + | - |
| Uracil | + | - | - |
| Uridine | + | - | - |
Present / Not Present = + / -
Total number of reactions and corresponding genes predicted as essential and important for growth in three simulated human body locations.
| Host niche | Essential reactions | Important reactions | Essential genes | Important genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrophage | 195 | 146 | 290 | 146 |
| Bloodstream | 193 | 65 | 288 | 182 |
| Urinary tract | 203 | 52 | 304 | 151 |
Fig 1Essential reactions predicted for three simulated host environmental conditions.
There are 38 reactions predicted to be commonly essential for all three simulated human body locations, whereas 38 essential reactions predicted that are differed for simulations of the human bloodstream, urinary tract, and macrophage.
E. coli and Salmonella genomes used in this study.
| Host niche | Enterobacterial human pathogenic strains | Genome of strain that causes disease |
|---|---|---|
| Bloodstream | Extraintestinal pathogenic | |
| Macrophage | ||
| Urinary tract | Urinary tract pathogenic | |
| Intestinal tract (control) | Enterohemorrhagic |
Total number of predicted essential and important genes lost out of total predicted for each strain.
| Host Niche | Genes Lost/Total Predicted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrophage | essential genes | 2/290 | 4/290 | 3/290 | 13/290 |
| Macrophage | important genes | 20/366 | 17/366 | 22/366 | 58/366 |
| Bloodstream | essential genes | 2/288 | 1/288 | 3/288 | 12/288 |
| Bloodstream | important genes | 14/182 | 12/182 | 18/182 | 26/182 |
| Urinary tract | essential genes | 2/304 | 6/304 | 4/304 | 12/304 |
| Urinary tract | important genes | 9/151 | 11/151 | 15/151 | 19/151 |
Total number of predicted essential and important genes lost out of total predicted for each strain.
| Host niche | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrophage | 22/656 | 21/656 | 25/656 | 71/656 |
| Bloodstream | 16/470 | 13/470 | 21/470 | 38/470 |
| Urinary tract | 11/455 | 17/455 | 19/455 | 31/455 |
aEvolutionary outcome agrees with in silico predictions for genome content
bEvolutionary outcome disagrees with in silico predictions for genome content
cEvolutionary outcome is within standard deviation with in silico predictions for genome content
Fig 2Essential gene identification using GEMs predictions under simulated environment.
The GEM constructed upon pangenome incorporated from E. coli genomes can be used to generate predations with simulated nutrient conditions to identify essential genes along with corresponding essential metabolic reactions under multiple human body niches.