Literature DB >> 26884368

Utility of Surgery/Radiotherapy in Distant Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Approach.

Tapan D Patel1, Emily Marchiano1, Oliver Y Chin1, Suat Kilic1, Jean Anderson Eloy2, Soly Baredes3, Richard Chan Woo Park4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the survival benefits of surgery and/or radiation therapy over no therapy in patients with metastatic (M1) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region (HN-SCC). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective administrative database analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for M1 HN-SCC cases from 1988 to 2012 (6663 patients). Patient demographics, initial treatment, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier model.
RESULTS: Of the 6663 patients identified with M1 HN-SCC in the SEER database, 1669 patients received no therapy; 2459 patients, radiotherapy; 570 patients, surgery; and 1100 patients, surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean survival was 8.44 months for patients who did not undergo any therapy. In comparison, patients who underwent radiotherapy alone, surgery alone, or surgery with radiotherapy had mean survivals of 18.03 (P < .0001), 31.07 (P < .0001), and 39.93 (P < .0001) months, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 6.35% for no therapy, 17.51% for radiotherapy alone, 30.50% for surgery alone, and 33.75% for surgery with radiotherapy (P < .0001). Site-specific analysis revealed that surgery and/or radiation provides disease-specific survival benefit as compared with no therapy at all subsites within the head and neck region.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and/or radiation-which has been shown to improve quality of life in patients with advanced cancer-is associated with an increased survival when utilized in patients with distant metastatic disease. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; M1; Surveillance; and End Result (SEER) database; epidemiology; head and neck; metastasis; squamous cell carcinoma; survival; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884368     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815627637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

Review 1.  Treatment Strategy for Distant Synchronous Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eliane Tang; Lucien Lahmi; Nicolas Meillan; Gianandrea Pietta; Sébastien Albert; Philippe Maingon
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Combined high-intensity local treatment and systemic therapy in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zachary S Zumsteg; Michael Luu; Emi J Yoshida; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart; John M David; Stephen L Shiao; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Eric J Sherman; Nancy Y Lee; Allen S Ho
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.921

3.  Prospective study on factors affecting the prognosis of oral cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Fengqiong Liu; Fa Chen; Jiangfeng Huang; Lingjun Yan; Fangping Liu; Junfeng Wu; Yu Qiu; Xiaoyan Zheng; Rongzhao Zhang; Lisong Lin; Baochang He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

4.  Potential therapeutic value of primary tumor resection in ampullary cancer patients with distant metastases at initial diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xiaobo Bo; Pinxiang Lu; Tao Suo; Xiaoling Ni; Han Liu; Hongtao Pan; Sheng Shen; Min Li; Dexiang Zhang; Yueqi Wang; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Prognostic Value of Local Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients With Different Metastatic Sites: A Population Based Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shengming Jin; Jiaming Wei; Junjie Wang; Beihe Wang; Junlong Wu; Hualei Gan; Bo Dai; Xiaojian Qin; Guowen Lin; Yu Wei; Chen Yang; Yijun Shen; Yiping Zhu; Yao Zhu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Prognostic value of primary tumor surgery in seminoma patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sheng-Ming Jin; Jia-Ming Wei; Jun-Long Wu; Bei-He Wang; Hua-Lei Gan; Pei-Hang Xu; Fang-Ning Wan; Wei-Jie Gu; Yu Wei; Chen Yang; Yi-Jun Shen; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  The Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Nomogram for Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Changxing Chi; Zhiyi Fan; Binbin Yang; He Sun; Zengpai Zheng
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.375

8.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Mean Platelet Volume and a Predictive Nomogram in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Based on Real-World Data.

Authors:  Yudong Ning; Hong Yang; Sheng Qin; Bangrong Cao; Zuxian Zhong; Chuanshi He; Guiquan Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Prognostic Impact of Metastatic Site and Pattern in Patients with Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Craig A Bollig; Christopher I Newberry; Tabitha L I Galloway; Robert P Zitsch; Elyse K Hanly; Vivian L Zhu; Nitin Pagedar; Rohit Nallani; Andres M Bur; William C Spanos; Jeffrey B Jorgensen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Prognostic value of primary tumor surgery in minor salivary-gland carcinoma patients with distant metastases at diagnosis: first evidence from a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Xiao Shi; Nai-Si Huang; Rong-Liang Shi; Wen-Jun Wei; Yu-Long Wang; Qing-Hai Ji
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.