Literature DB >> 26884199

Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance.

Anthea Pun1, Susan A J Birch2, Andrew Scott Baron2.   

Abstract

Detecting dominance relationships, within and across species, provides a clear fitness advantage because this ability helps individuals assess their potential risk of injury before engaging in a competition. Previous research has demonstrated that 10- to 13-mo-old infants can represent the dominance relationship between two agents in terms of their physical size (larger agent = more dominant), whereas younger infants fail to do so. It is unclear whether infants younger than 10 mo fail to represent dominance relationships in general, or whether they lack sensitivity to physical size as a cue to dominance. Two studies explored whether infants, like many species across the animal kingdom, use numerical group size to assess dominance relationships and whether this capacity emerges before their sensitivity to physical size. A third study ruled out an alternative explanation for our findings. Across these studies, we report that infants 6-12 mo of age use numerical group size to infer dominance relationships. Specifically, preverbal infants expect an agent from a numerically larger group to win in a right-of-way competition against an agent from a numerically smaller group. In addition, this is, to our knowledge, the first study to demonstrate that infants 6-9 mo of age are capable of understanding social dominance relations. These results demonstrate that infants' understanding of social dominance relations may be based on evolutionarily relevant cues and reveal infants' early sensitivity to an important adaptive function of social groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conflict; group size; infancy; social dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884199      PMCID: PMC4780600          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514879113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions.

Authors:  Samuel Bowles; Jung-Kyoo Choi; Astrid Hopfensitz
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Social hierarchies: size and growth modification in clownfish.

Authors:  Peter Buston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds.

Authors:  Valerie Kuhlmeier; Karen Wynn; Paul Bloom
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

Review 4.  Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species.

Authors:  Joan Y Chiao
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1989-02

6.  Group territoriality in two populations of African lions

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mental representations of social status.

Authors:  Joan Y Chiao; Andrew R Bordeaux; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-09

10.  Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities.

Authors:  Kimberly G Duffy; Richard W Wrangham; Joan B Silk
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  17 in total

1.  'To the victor go the spoils': Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Enright; Hyowon Gweon; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-03-24

2.  Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies.

Authors:  Jonas R Kunst; Ronald Fischer; Jim Sidanius; Lotte Thomsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rank acquisition in rhesus macaque yearlings following permanent maternal separation: The importance of the social and physical environment.

Authors:  Lauren J Wooddell; Stefano S K Kaburu; Ashley M Murphy; Stephen J Suomi; Amanda M Dettmer
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Infants expect leaders to right wrongs.

Authors:  Maayan Stavans; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The Origins of Social Categorization.

Authors:  Zoe Liberman; Amanda L Woodward; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Space and rank: infants expect agents in higher position to be socially dominant.

Authors:  Xianwei Meng; Yo Nakawake; Hiroshi Nitta; Kazuhide Hashiya; Yusuke Moriguchi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The cradle of social knowledge: Infants' reasoning about caregiving and affiliation.

Authors:  Annie C Spokes; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-12-05

8.  Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies.

Authors:  Francesco Margoni; Renée Baillargeon; Luca Surian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Social sampling: Children track social choices to reason about status hierarchies.

Authors:  Isobel A Heck; Tamar Kushnir; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-02-01

10.  Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources.

Authors:  Xianwei Meng; Yo Nakawake; Kazuhide Hashiya; Emily Burdett; Jonathan Jong; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.